Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

VRPTR prediction of individual language activation and uncertainty from resting state fMRI

  1. 1McGill University

Abstract

Resting-state connectivity can predict task-evoked fMRI activation, but correspondence with an individual task map may partly reflect a shared population pattern. We evaluated the Variational Resting-state-to-Task Prediction TransformeR (VRPTR), a three-dimensional encoder-decoder combining a compressed Transformer bottleneck, variational latent sampling, and multiscale skip connections. Models were trained in 360 healthy adults from the WU-Minn Human Connectome Project and evaluated in 40 held-out participants from the same dataset for the story-versus-math language contrast. VRPTR achieved mean voxel-map Pearson r=0.642 and Dice AUC=0.519, exceeding compact volumetric BrainSurfCNN-like and SWIFUN-like comparators by {Delta}r=0.0376 and 0.0335, respectively. A template fixed from the 360 training maps yielded residual correlation 0.364; VRPTR improved correlation but not mean absolute or root mean squared error over this template. A matched factorial ablation associated Transformer processing with improved map correlation ({Delta}r=0.0168); the variational main effect did not survive multiple-comparison correction. Component swaps indicated that subject-specific activation patterns depended more on multiscale skip features than on the bottleneck representation. Latent sampling produced a modest association between posterior standard deviation and voxelwise absolute error (mean Spearman {rho}=0.091). Raw 95% intervals covered only 4.7% of observed values. Five-fold calibration within the held-out cohort increased coverage to 94.8%, and spatially varying uncertainty modestly improved probabilistic scores over a constant-width model. Uncertainty also increased under input degradation. These findings support the contribution of Transformer processing to language-map prediction and distinguish it from subject-specific spatial conditioning and relative uncertainty estimation. Independent validation of calibrated uncertainty and evaluation in clinical cohorts remain necessary.

Related

  1. Resting-state alpha scale-free dynamics predict individual differences in the balance between reward-learned and preference-based values during free choice
    Jianhong Zhu, Junya Hashimoto, Tatsuru Honda +4
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyOSF
  2. A spatio-temporal fingerprints with hierarchical activation refinement for predicting task activation maps from resting-state fMRI
    Sasideep Pasumarthi, Sohan Devarasetty, Nitya Tiwari +1
    Magnetic resonance lettersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Efficient Deep Learning Models for Predicting Individualized Task Activation From Resting‐State Functional Connectivity
    Soren J. Madsen, Young-Eun Lee, Shaun K.L. Quah +8
    Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  4. Dissociating Resting-State Networks of Pedohebephilic Preference and Child Sexual Offending Using Network-Based Prediction
    E. Serin, K. R. Khan, T. Krueger +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Differential language recovery in an English-Polish bilingual individual with severe aphasia: a four-year longitudinal case study.
    Katarzyna E Polanowska, Aleksandra J Zielińska-Michalak
    Postepy psychiatrii neurologiiPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{giovanni2026vrptr,
  title = {{VRPTR prediction of individual language activation and uncertainty from resting state fMRI}},
  author = {D. A. Di Giovanni and D. L. Collins},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.754231},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754231v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - VRPTR prediction of individual language activation and uncertainty from resting state fMRI
AU  - D. A. Di Giovanni
AU  - D. L. Collins
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.24.754231
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.754231v1
AB  - Resting-state connectivity can predict task-evoked fMRI activation, but correspondence with an individual task map may partly reflect a shared population pattern. We evaluated the Variational Resting-state-to-Task Prediction TransformeR (VRPTR), a three-dimensional encoder-decoder combining a compressed Transformer bottleneck, variational latent sampling, and multiscale skip connections. Models were trained in 360 healthy adults from the WU-Minn Human Connectome Project and evaluated in 40 held-out participants from the same dataset for the story-versus-math language contrast. VRPTR achieved mean voxel-map Pearson r=0.642 and Dice AUC=0.519, exceeding compact volumetric BrainSurfCNN-like and SWIFUN-like comparators by {Delta}r=0.0376 and 0.0335, respectively. A template fixed from the 360 training maps yielded residual correlation 0.364; VRPTR improved correlation but not mean absolute or root mean squared error over this template. A matched factorial ablation associated Transformer processing with improved map correlation ({Delta}r=0.0168); the variational main effect did not survive multiple-comparison correction. Component swaps indicated that subject-specific activation patterns depended more on multiscale skip features than on the bottleneck representation. Latent sampling produced a modest association between posterior standard deviation and voxelwise absolute error (mean Spearman {rho}=0.091). Raw 95% intervals covered only 4.7% of observed values. Five-fold calibration within the held-out cohort increased coverage to 94.8%, and spatially varying uncertainty modestly improved probabilistic scores over a constant-width model. Uncertainty also increased under input degradation. These findings support the contribution of Transformer processing to language-map prediction and distinguish it from subject-specific spatial conditioning and relative uncertainty estimation. Independent validation of calibrated uncertainty and evaluation in clinical cohorts remain necessary.
ER  -