Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Communications Biology

Daytime illumination shapes sex differences in sleep and circadian responses to nighttime light

Abstract

Light is the primary environmental cue regulating circadian rhythms and sleep–wake behavior, yet daylight intensity is rarely standardized or reported. This variability may contribute to inconsistent findings on sex differences in sleep regulation. In prior work, we observed no sex differences in sleep–wake architecture under relatively bright daylight, suggesting that daytime illumination may be a critical but underappreciated determinant of sex difference in sleep regulation. Here, we tested whether daylight intensity modulates sex differences in sleep–wake architecture and vulnerability to dim light at night (DLaN). Male and female C57BL/6 J mice were exposed to acute (one night) or chronic (two weeks) DLaN (10-lux) under daytime light intensities of 50-, 100-, or 300-lux. Sleep was assessed using electroencephalographic measures of vigilance states and slow wave activity (SWA). Dim daylight (50-lux) revealed marked sex differences in dark phase that were absent under brighter daylight (300-lux). Acute DLaN reduced early-night wakefulness in both sexes under low daytime light but had little effect under bright daylight conditions. Following chronic DLaN, males showed reduced wakefulness and dampened rhythm amplitude, whereas females exhibited larger phase shifts, rhythm attenuation, and altered SWA timing under 50- and 100-lux, and bright daytime light largely prevented these effects.

Related

  1. Temporally Optimized Antioxidant Serums for Daytime Defense and Nighttime Repair: A Multicenter Clinical Investigation
    Jade Conway, Céline Blanché, Mathieu Grivet-Seyve +5
    Dermatology and TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCDOAJ
  2. Effect of cyclic daytime versus continuous enteral nutrition on circadian rhythms in critical illness: a randomized controlled trial
    F. W. Hiemstra, M. F. v. Gent, J. H. Meijer +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPhysiologymedRxiv
  3. Photic Phase Shifts of the Mouse Circadian Clock Are Defined by Scene Irradiance Across Differences in the Spatial Distribution of Light.
    Qian Huang, Franck P Martial, Riccardo Storchi +1
    Clocks & sleepPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  4. Effects of Circadian Phase and Exercise Training on Systemic and Tissue-Specific Redox Responses in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet
    Shuo Wang, Ziwei Zhang, Jiapeng Huang +6
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNutritionCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. The effect of differences in viewing environment and method on physiological responses and perceptual stability while viewing three-dimensional images
    Yasuyuki Matsuura, Shiyu Hitomi, Sota Hibino +1
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{wang2026daytime,
  title = {{Daytime illumination shapes sex differences in sleep and circadian responses to nighttime light}},
  author = {Yumeng Wang and Caihan Tony Chen and Tom Deboer and Gene D. Block and Ketema N. Paul and Christopher S. Colwell},
  journal = {Communications Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s42003-026-11099-7},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-11099-7},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Daytime illumination shapes sex differences in sleep and circadian responses to nighttime light
AU  - Yumeng Wang
AU  - Caihan Tony Chen
AU  - Tom Deboer
AU  - Gene D. Block
AU  - Ketema N. Paul
AU  - Christopher S. Colwell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Communications Biology
DO  - 10.1038/s42003-026-11099-7
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-11099-7
AB  - Light is the primary environmental cue regulating circadian rhythms and sleep–wake behavior, yet daylight intensity is rarely standardized or reported. This variability may contribute to inconsistent findings on sex differences in sleep regulation. In prior work, we observed no sex differences in sleep–wake architecture under relatively bright daylight, suggesting that daytime illumination may be a critical but underappreciated determinant of sex difference in sleep regulation. Here, we tested whether daylight intensity modulates sex differences in sleep–wake architecture and vulnerability to dim light at night (DLaN). Male and female C57BL/6 J mice were exposed to acute (one night) or chronic (two weeks) DLaN (10-lux) under daytime light intensities of 50-, 100-, or 300-lux. Sleep was assessed using electroencephalographic measures of vigilance states and slow wave activity (SWA). Dim daylight (50-lux) revealed marked sex differences in dark phase that were absent under brighter daylight (300-lux). Acute DLaN reduced early-night wakefulness in both sexes under low daytime light but had little effect under bright daylight conditions. Following chronic DLaN, males showed reduced wakefulness and dampened rhythm amplitude, whereas females exhibited larger phase shifts, rhythm attenuation, and altered SWA timing under 50- and 100-lux, and bright daytime light largely prevented these effects.
SN  - 2399-3642
ER  -