Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing

Abstract

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was described after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and can contribute to persistent dyspnoea and other associated symptoms but the evolution of DB after COVID-19 is poorly described. Individuals with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 were evaluated and those diagnosed with DB were included. DB was diagnosed by identifying an abnormal breathing pattern during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) associated with compatible symptoms after ruling out cardiopulmonary conditions that could account for the symptoms. All included patients were prospectively followed and systematically assessed 6–9 months after their diagnosis. Given the multiplicity of analyses and the absence of a pre-specified primary analysis, all findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Forty-eight patients were included and 45 patients were successfully reassessed at 6–9 months. Forty-two received specific respiratory physiotherapy targeting DB. The proportion of individuals with a Nijmegen score ≥ 23 decreased from 30 (68%) at baseline to 19 (43%) at follow-up ( p = 0.02). Dyspnea improved at 6–9 months, with 0%, 11%, 44%, 35%, and 11% of patients presenting mMRC grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 at baseline, compared with 20%, 39%, 37%, 4%, and 0% at follow-up ( p < 0.001). Improvements in quality of life and functional status were observed. However, 21 patients (47%) continued to experience significant functional limitations, defined as a post-COVID-19 functional status (PCFS) scale score ≥ 2. Objective markers of DB during CPET improved, with reductions in hyperventilation, dispersion of breathing parameters, and the number of sighs. In most patients diagnosed with DB after COVID-19, improvements in symptoms, QoL, functional status and objective markers of DB were observed at 6–9 months. A substantial proportion of patients remained disabled.

Related

  1. Electrocardiographic Changes Following Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy for Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Pilot Prospective Study
    Francisco Alves de Sousa, Mariline Santos, Marta Rios +3
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Exercise capacity and handgrip strength following dumbbell-assisted diaphragmatic breathing training in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective single-arm study
    Xinyu Yuan, Wei Ge, Xiaojie Zhu +3
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Vision impairment, depressive symptoms, and risk of incident coronary events: a prospective cohort study
    Yang Liu, Junyan Ling, Guangli Sun +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  4. Gastrointestinal medication use patterns and incident depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years or older: a prospective multicohort study
    S. Wang, D. Lu, T. Tao
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPharmacology & toxicologymedRxiv
  5. Predictability of symptom changes following hemithyroidectomy due to compression symptoms assessed by specific questionnaires: prospective multicentre study.
    Ervin Beka, Ivan Shabo, David Fornander +2
    BJS openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{genecand2026evolution,
  title = {{Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing}},
  author = {Léon Genecand and Isabelle Frésard and Marco Altarelli and Alzbeta Binkova and Stéphanie Vaudan and Arnaud Rapillard and Antoine Beurnier and David Montani and Cyril Jaksic and Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-72712-7},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72712-7},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing
AU  - Léon Genecand
AU  - Isabelle Frésard
AU  - Marco Altarelli
AU  - Alzbeta Binkova
AU  - Stéphanie Vaudan
AU  - Arnaud Rapillard
AU  - Antoine Beurnier
AU  - David Montani
AU  - Cyril Jaksic
AU  - Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-72712-7
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-72712-7
AB  - Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was described after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and can contribute to persistent dyspnoea and other associated symptoms but the evolution of DB after COVID-19 is poorly described. Individuals with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 were evaluated and those diagnosed with DB were included. DB was diagnosed by identifying an abnormal breathing pattern during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) associated with compatible symptoms after ruling out cardiopulmonary conditions that could account for the symptoms. All included patients were prospectively followed and systematically assessed 6–9 months after their diagnosis. Given the multiplicity of analyses and the absence of a pre-specified primary analysis, all findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Forty-eight patients were included and 45 patients were successfully reassessed at 6–9 months. Forty-two received specific respiratory physiotherapy targeting DB. The proportion of individuals with a Nijmegen score ≥ 23 decreased from 30 (68%) at baseline to 19 (43%) at follow-up ( p = 0.02). Dyspnea improved at 6–9 months, with 0%, 11%, 44%, 35%, and 11% of patients presenting mMRC grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 at baseline, compared with 20%, 39%, 37%, 4%, and 0% at follow-up ( p < 0.001). Improvements in quality of life and functional status were observed. However, 21 patients (47%) continued to experience significant functional limitations, defined as a post-COVID-19 functional status (PCFS) scale score ≥ 2. Objective markers of DB during CPET improved, with reductions in hyperventilation, dispersion of breathing parameters, and the number of sighs. In most patients diagnosed with DB after COVID-19, improvements in symptoms, QoL, functional status and objective markers of DB were observed at 6–9 months. A substantial proportion of patients remained disabled.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -