Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Japanese Journal of Radiology

Deep learning reconstruction-applied PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging in uterine malignancies: a comparison study with MUSE

  1. 1Division of Radiology, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1, Nishi-Cho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504 Japan
  2. 2Department of Clinical Radiology, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) between deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-applied Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) and MUltiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) sequences in MRI of uterine malignancies.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 66 MRI examinations of 48 patients. The cohort consisted of cases with uterine malignancies (cervical cancer (n = 50), endometrial cancer (n = 15) and endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 1)) at different clinical settings (initial staging, post-treatment, or recurrence). DWI was performed using both DLR-applied PROPELLER and MUSE sequences using b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. Two independent reviewers evaluated overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, and lesion conspicuity using a 5-point Likert scale. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR), and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR) were quantitatively measured in both sequences.

Results: In the qualitative assessment, DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI showed significantly fewer artifacts and better lesion conspicuity than MUSE-DWI. No significant difference was found in overall image quality or sharpness. Inter-reader agreement was slight to moderate, except for strong agreement on DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI lesion conspicuity (κ = 0.696, good). Quantitatively, the mean ADC values were significantly higher with DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI compared to MUSE-DWI for both readers (p < 0.001). Furthermore, both aSNR and aCNR were significantly higher with DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI compared to MUSE-DWI.

Conclusions: DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI demonstrated fewer artifacts and better lesion conspicuity than MUSE-DWI, with higher measured aSNR and aCNR. However, DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI yielded significantly higher mean ADC values.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9.

Related

  1. Learning optimized sampling patterns for accelerated MRI reconstruction via diffusion models
    Sriram Ravula, Brett Levac, Yamin Arefeen +2
    Journal of Medical ImagingPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedMedical imaging & radiologyPMCOpenAlex
  2. Nasal Sidewall Propeller Flap for 1-stage Reconstruction of Lateral Nasal Ala Defects
    Valentine Poissonnet, MD, Gilles Poissonnet, MD, Roxane Elaldi, MD +5
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  3. Quantification of plaque and detection of high-risk plaque characteristics based on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison between superresolution deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction
    Limiao Zou, Keting Xu, Xiaohuan Liu +26
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. Evaluation of accelerated whole-body diffusion weighted imaging with deep learning reconstruction in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: assessment of image quality and ADC estimates.
    E. Kousi, M. Rata, D.-M. Koh +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  5. Context-dependent aesthetic perception after facial local flap reconstruction for cutaneous malignancies: a multi-observer study integrating patient-reported outcomes and public perspective.
    Ersin Yavuz, Esra Zeynep Kurtoğlu, Levent Demir +1
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gonda2026deep,
  title = {{Deep learning reconstruction-applied PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging in uterine malignancies: a comparison study with MUSE}},
  author = {Takuro Gonda and Ryoya Ochiai and Hiroto Yunaga and Kyohei Okuda and Yudai Ota and Shinya Fujii},
  journal = {Japanese Journal of Radiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Deep learning reconstruction-applied PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging in uterine malignancies: a comparison study with MUSE
AU  - Takuro Gonda
AU  - Ryoya Ochiai
AU  - Hiroto Yunaga
AU  - Kyohei Okuda
AU  - Yudai Ota
AU  - Shinya Fujii
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/15
JO  - Japanese Journal of Radiology
DO  - 10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9
AB  - Purpose: To compare the image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) between deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-applied Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) and MUltiplexed Sensitivity Encoding (MUSE) sequences in MRI of uterine malignancies.  Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 66 MRI examinations of 48 patients. The cohort consisted of cases with uterine malignancies (cervical cancer (n = 50), endometrial cancer (n = 15) and endometrial stromal sarcoma (n = 1)) at different clinical settings (initial staging, post-treatment, or recurrence). DWI was performed using both DLR-applied PROPELLER and MUSE sequences using b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. Two independent reviewers evaluated overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, and lesion conspicuity using a 5-point Likert scale. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR), and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR) were quantitatively measured in both sequences.  Results: In the qualitative assessment, DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI showed significantly fewer artifacts and better lesion conspicuity than MUSE-DWI. No significant difference was found in overall image quality or sharpness. Inter-reader agreement was slight to moderate, except for strong agreement on DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI lesion conspicuity (κ = 0.696, good). Quantitatively, the mean ADC values were significantly higher with DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI compared to MUSE-DWI for both readers (p < 0.001). Furthermore, both aSNR and aCNR were significantly higher with DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI compared to MUSE-DWI.  Conclusions: DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI demonstrated fewer artifacts and better lesion conspicuity than MUSE-DWI, with higher measured aSNR and aCNR. However, DLR-applied PROPELLER-DWI yielded significantly higher mean ADC values.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02048-9.
SN  - 1867-1071
SN  - 1867-108X
ER  -