Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in surgery

Context-dependent aesthetic perception after facial local flap reconstruction for cutaneous malignancies: a multi-observer study integrating patient-reported outcomes and public perspective.

  1. 1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
  2. 2Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Abstract

Background

Local flaps are fundamental for reconstruction of facial defects after cutaneous tumor resection, yet perceived aesthetic success may differ among surgeons, patients, and the general public.Objectives

To investigate context-dependent aesthetic perception across facial regions and evaluator groups and its relationship with patient-reported FACE-Q outcomes.Methods

Twenty-three patients undergoing local flap reconstruction after facial tumor resection were evaluated using preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs. Overall, 203 evaluators-plastic surgeons, non-plastic surgeons, non-surgical physicians, and the general public-rated outcomes on a five-point scale, first using postoperative images alone and subsequently after viewing corresponding preoperative photographs. FACE-Q Face Overall, Natural Appearance, and Psychological Function scales were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.Results

Preoperative context resulted in significantly more critical ratings across perioral, periocular, and malar regions (all p<0.001). Perceptual shifts differed among evaluator groups in perioral (p=0.007) and periocular (p=0.015) regions, with plastic surgeons showing smaller shifts. FACE-Q Face Overall and Natural Appearance scores improved significantly postoperatively. A study-specific summary score derived from the three selected FACE-Q scales was significantly associated with general-public ratings (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.008).Conclusions

Aesthetic assessment after facial local flap reconstruction is context-dependent. Integrating FACE-Q patient-reported outcomes with public perception may provide a more patient-centered assessment of reconstructive success.

Related

  1. Deep learning reconstruction-applied PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging in uterine malignancies: a comparison study with MUSE
    Takuro Gonda, Ryoya Ochiai, Hiroto Yunaga +3
    Japanese Journal of RadiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
  2. Digitalized “preventive treatment” in chronic disease control and proactive health: a perspective on integrating TCM wisdom with digital intelligence
    Hui Xu, Binyu Luo, Fenfen Hu +5
    Frontiers in Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJEurope PMC
  3. Three-dimensional anatomical reconstruction as a guideline-anchored framework for choosing between lung-sparing resection and image-guided ablation in deep subsolid pulmonary nodules: a thoracic surgeon’s perspective
    Zhe Li, Huixian Li
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  4. Prediction of Spinal Pain Intensity from Perception-Dependent Stimulation Thresholds and Patient Characteristics: A Regression and Machine Learning Approach
    Kübra Okuyucu, Aybike Şenel, Ahmet Gülünay +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Exploring Vitamin D Metabolism in Gynaecological Malignancies: Redox-Dependent and Redox-Independent Anticancer Mechanisms From Preclinical Models to Clinical Evidence.
    Hoi Ching Cherry Chan, Sachin Bhoora, Esther Zhou +2
    Cancer medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yavuz2026contextdependent,
  title = {{Context-dependent aesthetic perception after facial local flap reconstruction for cutaneous malignancies: a multi-observer study integrating patient-reported outcomes and public perspective.}},
  author = {Ersin Yavuz and Esra Zeynep Kurtoğlu and Levent Demir and Alp Ercan},
  journal = {Frontiers in surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2026.1982895},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898458},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Context-dependent aesthetic perception after facial local flap reconstruction for cutaneous malignancies: a multi-observer study integrating patient-reported outcomes and public perspective.
AU  - Ersin Yavuz
AU  - Esra Zeynep Kurtoğlu
AU  - Levent Demir
AU  - Alp Ercan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in surgery
DO  - 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1982895
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898458
AB  - Background  Local flaps are fundamental for reconstruction of facial defects after cutaneous tumor resection, yet perceived aesthetic success may differ among surgeons, patients, and the general public.Objectives  To investigate context-dependent aesthetic perception across facial regions and evaluator groups and its relationship with patient-reported FACE-Q outcomes.Methods  Twenty-three patients undergoing local flap reconstruction after facial tumor resection were evaluated using preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs. Overall, 203 evaluators-plastic surgeons, non-plastic surgeons, non-surgical physicians, and the general public-rated outcomes on a five-point scale, first using postoperative images alone and subsequently after viewing corresponding preoperative photographs. FACE-Q Face Overall, Natural Appearance, and Psychological Function scales were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.Results  Preoperative context resulted in significantly more critical ratings across perioral, periocular, and malar regions (all p<0.001). Perceptual shifts differed among evaluator groups in perioral (p=0.007) and periocular (p=0.015) regions, with plastic surgeons showing smaller shifts. FACE-Q Face Overall and Natural Appearance scores improved significantly postoperatively. A study-specific summary score derived from the three selected FACE-Q scales was significantly associated with general-public ratings (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.008).Conclusions  Aesthetic assessment after facial local flap reconstruction is context-dependent. Integrating FACE-Q patient-reported outcomes with public perception may provide a more patient-centered assessment of reconstructive success.
SN  - 2296-875X
ER  -