Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Dosimetric impact of target volume anatomical parameters on radiotherapy after right-sided breast-conserving surgery

  1. 1Department of Oncology, The People’s Hospital of Rongchang District
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of target volume Anatomical Parameters on organ at risk (OAR) following breast-conserving surgery and subsequent radiotherapy in patients with right-sided breast cancer.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 33 patients who underwent post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy. The transverse diameter (TD), oblique diameter (OD), and the ratio of transverse diameter to oblique diameter (TOR) were measured at the nipple-center plane for all patients. Bivariate Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the effects of TD, OD, and TOR on V 20Gy , V 5Gy , D mean of the affected lung; D mean and V 5Gy of heart; D mean of the right coronary artery (RCA); D mean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD); V 5Gy of the contralateral lung; and D mean of the contralateral breast.

Results: OD and TD showed significant correlations with V 20Gy , V 5Gy , and D mean of the affected lung ( 0.5 < R < 0.7, P < 0.01 ); The TD was significantly correlated with Heart_D mean ( R = 0.58, P < 0.01 ), strongly correlated with RCA_D mean ( R = 0.45, P < 0.01 ), and strongly correlated with LAD_D mean ( R = 0.42, P < 0.05 ); The TOR was significantly correlated with Heart_D mean ( R = 0.47, P < 0.01 ), strongly correlated with LAD_D mean ( R = 0.47, P < 0.01 ).

Conclusion: Exploratory observational thresholds from our cohort: target volume with TD >8.00 cm or OD >19.56 cm indicates higher lung dose risk; TD >8.00 cm or TOR >0.47 indicates higher cardiac dose risk. These thresholds were not optimized by ROC analysis and cannot be directly used for clinical risk stratification; prospective validation is needed. Clinical planning should minimize heart and lung radiation.

Related

  1. Dosimetric benefits of deep inspiration breath-hold in postoperative radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: an anatomical parameter-based analysis
    Yanli Cui, Shuai Xu, Xiaozhen Wang +6
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Four-Field Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in the Management of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Dual-Centre Analysis
    Alaa AbdAllah, wafaa mohamed, Amani Saber +1
    Minia Journal of Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. Dosimetric and Treatment Delivery Efficiency Comparison of Two Ring-gantry Linear Accelerator Platforms for Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Srikanth Guduru, Rohith Singareddy, N. V. N. Madhusudhana Sresty +2
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  4. CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Ultrahypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Dosimetric Outcomes and Acute Toxicity.
    Giovanni Ursi, Matea Lekić, Hrvoje Kaučić +5
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  5. Comparative Dosimetric Evaluation of Tomotherapy with a 1-cm Field Width versus Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy for Whole-brain Radiotherapy with Hippocampal Avoidance
    Sankar Sekar, R. Leel Malar, Dinesh Babu A +4
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{zou2026dosimetric,
  title = {{Dosimetric impact of target volume anatomical parameters on radiotherapy after right-sided breast-conserving surgery}},
  author = {Lu Zou and Zeping Deng and Xingliang Liao and Ling Duan and Xuefen Liu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1944304},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1944304/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dosimetric impact of target volume anatomical parameters on radiotherapy after right-sided breast-conserving surgery
AU  - Lu Zou
AU  - Zeping Deng
AU  - Xingliang Liao
AU  - Ling Duan
AU  - Xuefen Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1944304
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1944304/full
AB  - Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of target volume Anatomical Parameters on organ at risk (OAR) following breast-conserving surgery and subsequent radiotherapy in patients with right-sided breast cancer.  Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 33 patients who underwent post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy. The transverse diameter (TD), oblique diameter (OD), and the ratio of transverse diameter to oblique diameter (TOR) were measured at the nipple-center plane for all patients. Bivariate Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the effects of TD, OD, and TOR on V 20Gy , V 5Gy , D mean of the affected lung; D mean and V 5Gy of heart; D mean of the right coronary artery (RCA); D mean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD); V 5Gy of the contralateral lung; and D mean of the contralateral breast.  Results: OD and TD showed significant correlations with V 20Gy , V 5Gy , and D mean of the affected lung ( 0.5 < R < 0.7, P < 0.01 ); The TD was significantly correlated with Heart_D mean ( R = 0.58, P < 0.01 ), strongly correlated with RCA_D mean ( R = 0.45, P < 0.01 ), and strongly correlated with LAD_D mean ( R = 0.42, P < 0.05 ); The TOR was significantly correlated with Heart_D mean ( R = 0.47, P < 0.01 ), strongly correlated with LAD_D mean ( R = 0.47, P < 0.01 ).  Conclusion: Exploratory observational thresholds from our cohort: target volume with TD >8.00 cm or OD >19.56 cm indicates higher lung dose risk; TD >8.00 cm or TOR >0.47 indicates higher cardiac dose risk. These thresholds were not optimized by ROC analysis and cannot be directly used for clinical risk stratification; prospective validation is needed. Clinical planning should minimize heart and lung radiation.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -