Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
193,349 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Quantum-Classical Iterative Refinement for the Pressure-Poisson Equation on NISQ Hardware

Abstract

We present a hybrid quantum-classical iterative refinement for the pressure-Poisson equation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes projection method on noisy quantum hardware. Rather than solving the pressure equation once per time step, we solve it repeatedly for the normalized residual and scale each quantum direction by a least-squares fit to the physical residual. As a result, the error of the quantum solve enters as a contraction factor sinθk of the residual rather than as an error floor. This removes the requirement of a state infidelity below 10−7 that was estimated for single-solve schemes. The hardware noise then sets the rate of convergence but not the attainable accuracy, and it is this change of the role of the quantum solve, not an improvement of the hardware, that allows the residual to converge. With a boundary-consistent staggered (MAC) discretization, the pressure residual equals the velocity divergence left after projection up to the factor Δt/ρ. On the IBM processor ibm_cleveland, a four-qubit (16×16) problem reached a relative residual below 10−7 within eight to ten corrections in all 20 runs of a pre-registered experiment, whereas a single solve with a comparable number of shots stopped at 0.33-0.59. In a six-qubit (64×64) pilot, all three runs reached the same tolerance in 13 corrections. On the IonQ Forte processor, a manufactured-solution benchmark reached 5.6×10−8 in nine corrections. With the variational training itself carried out on ibm_cleveland, the residual fell to 5.6×10−4 in seven corrections, below the pre-specified tolerance of 10−3, at the rate predicted by a noise model. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first converged pressure solutions obtained on quantum hardware.

Related

  1. An analysis of iterative refinement for quantum linear system solvers
    Adrian Harkness, Mohammadhossein Mohammadisiahroudi, Brandon Augustino +2
  2. Resource Assessment of Classical and Quantum Hardware for Post-Quench Dynamics
    Joseph Vovrosh, Tiago Mendes-Santos, Hadriel Mamann +6
    PRX EnergyPeer-reviewedCC BYQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  3. Reducing quantum and classical resources for quantum-centric supercomputing workloads on near-term hardware
    Maxence Grandadam, Vladyslav Bohun, Dikshant Dulal +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Classical Pre-Training of Large Shallow Parametrized Quantum Circuits through Pauli Propagation and deployment on Quantum Hardware
    Saverio Monaco, Jamal Slim, Ran Xue +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. HybridQC: Hardware-Grounded Simulation of Tightly Integrated Hybrid Quantum-Classical Systems
    Panayiotis Christou, Shuwen Kan, Ying Mao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ahn2026quantumclassical,
  title = {{Quantum-Classical Iterative Refinement for the Pressure-Poisson Equation on NISQ Hardware}},
  author = {Doyeol "David" Ahn and Byeongyong Park and Rho Shin Myong and Franz Klein},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.24342},
  eprint = {2610.24342},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24342},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum-Classical Iterative Refinement for the Pressure-Poisson Equation on NISQ Hardware
AU  - Doyeol "David" Ahn
AU  - Byeongyong Park
AU  - Rho Shin Myong
AU  - Franz Klein
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24342
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24342
AB  - We present a hybrid quantum-classical iterative refinement for the pressure-Poisson equation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes projection method on noisy quantum hardware. Rather than solving the pressure equation once per time step, we solve it repeatedly for the normalized residual and scale each quantum direction by a least-squares fit to the physical residual. As a result, the error of the quantum solve enters as a contraction factor sinθ_k of the residual rather than as an error floor. This removes the requirement of a state infidelity below 10^−7 that was estimated for single-solve schemes. The hardware noise then sets the rate of convergence but not the attainable accuracy, and it is this change of the role of the quantum solve, not an improvement of the hardware, that allows the residual to converge. With a boundary-consistent staggered (MAC) discretization, the pressure residual equals the velocity divergence left after projection up to the factor Δt/ρ. On the IBM processor ibm_cleveland, a four-qubit (16×16) problem reached a relative residual below 10^−7 within eight to ten corrections in all 20 runs of a pre-registered experiment, whereas a single solve with a comparable number of shots stopped at 0.33-0.59. In a six-qubit (64×64) pilot, all three runs reached the same tolerance in 13 corrections. On the IonQ Forte processor, a manufactured-solution benchmark reached 5.6×10^−8 in nine corrections. With the variational training itself carried out on ibm_cleveland, the residual fell to 5.6×10^−4 in seven corrections, below the pre-specified tolerance of 10^−3, at the rate predicted by a noise model. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first converged pressure solutions obtained on quantum hardware.
ER  -