Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Diseases of the colon and rectum

Hypnosis for Postoperative Pain Management After Colectomies: A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

  1. 1School of Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
  2. 2Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom
  3. 3Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain management after colectomy remains challenging, with opioid-related complications impacting recovery. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing clinical hypnosis as an adjunctive intervention.

Objective: To determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial investigating hypnosis for post-colectomy pain management.

Design: Single-centre randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Setting: District general hospital in South-West England (July 2023–February 2024).

Patients: Forty-one adults undergoing elective colectomy.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to standard care or standard care plus three perioperative hypnosis sessions (preoperatively, first and third day post-surgery).

Main Outcome Measures: Primary: recruitment rates, retention, and intervention adherence. Secondary: pain scores (Numeric Pain Scale), analgesic requirements, and complications.

Results: Recruitment achieved 58% (41/71 eligible patients), with 90% retention and 92.5% intervention adherence. The hypnosis group demonstrated pain reductions approximating the minimum clinically important difference, providing signals of potential clinical benefit following sessions: at 24 hours post-surgery, median pain decreased from 5.0 to 2.5 (median difference -2.0, 95% confidence interval -2.5 to -1.0), and at Day 3, from 4.0 to 1.5 (median difference -2.5, 95% confidence interval -3.0 to -1.5). Between-group comparisons showed lower pain in the hypnosis group at 24 hours (median 5.0 vs 6.0, median difference -1.2, 95% confidence interval -2.3 to -0.1).

Limitations: Single-centre design limits generalizability; participant and staff blinding was unfeasible; hypnotisability was not assessed.

Conclusions: Hypnosis is feasible in acute surgical settings, with trends supporting pain reduction and positive patient experiences. A definitive trial is warranted to determine efficacy for post-colectomy pain management.

Related

  1. Feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of a patient-centred transition program for stroke survivors and their caregivers—P-NAVISTROKE study
    Marion Delvallée, Apolline Blazer, Mathilde Marchal +5
    Disability and RehabilitationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Goals in Focus: A single-blind multi-method randomized‑controlled pilot feasibility trial of a targeted CBT approach for motivational negative symptoms of schizophrenia
    Matthias Pillny, Alisa Schormann, Tania Marie Lincoln
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  3. Erector spinae plane block added to intercostal nerve block versus intercostal nerve block alone for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Hyerim Kim, Dongwook Won, Jee-Eun Chang +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePharmacology & toxicologyPLOSPMC
  4. SOFTPEERS: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a peer-led intervention to prevent binge drinking in adolescents. Results from a mixed-methods pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Florence Cousson-Gélie, Olivier Lareyre, Emilie Charton +10
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHALHAL
  5. Hydrolyzed Rice Formula for the Management of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Infants and Young Children: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hania Szajewska, Elżbieta Jarocka-Cyrta, Agata Stróżyk +5
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{toth2026hypnosis,
  title = {{Hypnosis for Postoperative Pain Management After Colectomies: A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial}},
  author = {Ana-Maria Toth and Paul Mackey and Stefano Di Donato and Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch},
  journal = {Diseases of the colon and rectum},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1097/dcr.0000000000004384},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000004384},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Hypnosis for Postoperative Pain Management After Colectomies: A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial
AU  - Ana-Maria Toth
AU  - Paul Mackey
AU  - Stefano Di Donato
AU  - Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/27
JO  - Diseases of the colon and rectum
DO  - 10.1097/dcr.0000000000004384
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000004384
AB  - Background: Postoperative pain management after colectomy remains challenging, with opioid-related complications impacting recovery. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing clinical hypnosis as an adjunctive intervention.  Objective: To determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial investigating hypnosis for post-colectomy pain management.  Design: Single-centre randomized controlled feasibility trial.  Setting: District general hospital in South-West England (July 2023–February 2024).  Patients: Forty-one adults undergoing elective colectomy.  Interventions: Participants were randomized to standard care or standard care plus three perioperative hypnosis sessions (preoperatively, first and third day post-surgery).  Main Outcome Measures: Primary: recruitment rates, retention, and intervention adherence. Secondary: pain scores (Numeric Pain Scale), analgesic requirements, and complications.  Results: Recruitment achieved 58% (41/71 eligible patients), with 90% retention and 92.5% intervention adherence. The hypnosis group demonstrated pain reductions approximating the minimum clinically important difference, providing signals of potential clinical benefit following sessions: at 24 hours post-surgery, median pain decreased from 5.0 to 2.5 (median difference -2.0, 95% confidence interval -2.5 to -1.0), and at Day 3, from 4.0 to 1.5 (median difference -2.5, 95% confidence interval -3.0 to -1.5). Between-group comparisons showed lower pain in the hypnosis group at 24 hours (median 5.0 vs 6.0, median difference -1.2, 95% confidence interval -2.3 to -0.1).  Limitations: Single-centre design limits generalizability; participant and staff blinding was unfeasible; hypnotisability was not assessed.  Conclusions: Hypnosis is feasible in acute surgical settings, with trends supporting pain reduction and positive patient experiences. A definitive trial is warranted to determine efficacy for post-colectomy pain management.
SN  - 0012-3706
SN  - 1530-0358
ER  -