Redesigning the linear--quadratic--Gaussian cost function for feedback cooling of a quantum harmonic oscillator
Abstract
Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.
Related
- Environment-aware transverse transport geometry for non-Gaussian oscillator states
- Noise-aware derivative feedback of a harmonic oscillator under quantum-limited position measurement
- Near-optimal synthesis of non-Gaussian phase gates via qubit-oscillator Rabi control
- THE ZETA FUNCTION OF THE QUARTIC OSCILLATOR †
- The zeta function of the quartic oscillator
BibTeX
@misc{sugiura2026redesigning,
title = {{Redesigning the linear--quadratic--Gaussian cost function for feedback cooling of a quantum harmonic oscillator}},
author = {Shuma Sugiura and Koki Shiraishi and Masahito Ueda},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.18195},
eprint = {2609.18195},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18195},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Redesigning the linear--quadratic--Gaussian cost function for feedback cooling of a quantum harmonic oscillator
AU - Shuma Sugiura
AU - Koki Shiraishi
AU - Masahito Ueda
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.18195
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18195
AB - Linear--quadratic--Gaussian (LQG) control is optimal only with respect to a prescribed cost function, the choice of which dictates the physical objective of the control. We consider feedback cooling of a continuously monitored quantum harmonic oscillator by shifting the minimum of its trapping potential. In this setting, the physically relevant cooling objective can be defined as minimizing the oscillator's energy relative to the feedback-shifted potential. In contrast, conventional LQG control evaluates the energy from a fixed origin and thus fails to directly optimize this quantity. To address this problem, we introduce a redesigned cost function that explicitly accounts for the feedback-induced shift of the potential. We then derive the corresponding optimal feedback law and obtain an analytic expression for the minimum achievable steady-state phonon occupation number. The redesigned LQG control achieves a lower occupation number than low-pass-filter (LPF) feedback formulated for the same cooling objective. While this improvement is minor at detection efficiencies currently attainable in experiments---indicating that LPF feedback already delivers near-optimal cooling performance---the advantage becomes pronounced as the detection efficiency approaches unity. In this regime, the redesigned LQG control provides an increasing advantage for reaching the motional ground state at a finite measurement strength. We clarify that the conventional and redesigned cost functions represent distinct control objectives rather than different implementations of the same optimization problem.
ER -