A dynamic calculation model for river ecological flow based on variable intervals
- 1State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, China; Corresponding author.
- 2State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, China
- 3State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, China; Powerchina Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Xi'an 710065, China
Abstract
Conventional ecological-flow assessments often rely on fixed thresholds or static hydrological indices, limiting their ability to capture hydrological variability, ecological-service demands, and reach-scale water losses. To address these limitations, this study develops a dynamic ecological-flow calculation and adaptive regulation model based on variable ecological-flow intervals, in which ecological flow is represented by lower and upper limits rather than a single fixed value. Hydrological shifts are identified using change-point detection, and variable ecological base-flow and incremental-flow intervals are derived by integrating multiple hydrological methods and ecological-service demands. River seepage and water-surface evaporation are further incorporated to derive the final ecological-flow intervals. A guarantee-level-based adaptive regulation mechanism is developed to adjust ecological-flow allocation under different hydrological conditions. The model was applied to the Shaanxi reach of the Wei River mainstream. The results show that ecological-flow intervals generally increase from upstream to downstream and are higher during the flood season than during the non-flood season. The dominant contributors to ecological-flow requirements differed between upstream and downstream reaches, with environmental-protection demand accounting for 64.6%–78.6% of the upper ecological-flow limits at upstream sections and sediment-transport demand accounting for up to 98.0% downstream. Under moderately dry conditions, lower ecological-flow limits generally achieved high guarantee levels, whereas upper ecological-flow limits associated with ecological-service demands showed greater seasonal variability. Under extremely dry conditions, the reliability of upper ecological-flow limits decreased, particularly in downstream reaches, although adaptive regulation improved the guarantee levels of high-priority ecological-service demands. Compared with conventional fixed-threshold ecological-flow approaches, the proposed model provides a more adaptive representation by integrating hydrological regime shifts, ecological-service demands, and reach-scale water losses, thereby supporting ecological-flow management in regulated and water-scarce river systems.
Related
- Calculation and application of the selenium toxicity coefficient for potential ecological risk assessment
- Assessment of trace metals and arsenic contamination in water and sediments in a former mining area of the river basin after an ecological disaster, Slana River, Slovakia
- Ecological sensitivity and sustainable spatial planning in a highly urbanized plain: An AHP-GIS and geodetector approach in the Yangtze River Delta Plain
- Preservation and storage effects on river sediment microbiomes: Implications for community stability and ecological inference
- Ecological recovery trajectories of coastal wetlands following oil-well abandonment in the Yellow River Delta
BibTeX
@article{wei2026dynamic,
title = {{A dynamic calculation model for river ecological flow based on variable intervals}},
author = {Na Wei and Yujin Yang and Kunming Lu and Haoqiang Qie and Yilin Wang},
journal = {Ecological Indicators},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115491},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115491},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A dynamic calculation model for river ecological flow based on variable intervals
AU - Na Wei
AU - Yujin Yang
AU - Kunming Lu
AU - Haoqiang Qie
AU - Yilin Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Ecological Indicators
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115491
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115491
AB - Conventional ecological-flow assessments often rely on fixed thresholds or static hydrological indices, limiting their ability to capture hydrological variability, ecological-service demands, and reach-scale water losses. To address these limitations, this study develops a dynamic ecological-flow calculation and adaptive regulation model based on variable ecological-flow intervals, in which ecological flow is represented by lower and upper limits rather than a single fixed value. Hydrological shifts are identified using change-point detection, and variable ecological base-flow and incremental-flow intervals are derived by integrating multiple hydrological methods and ecological-service demands. River seepage and water-surface evaporation are further incorporated to derive the final ecological-flow intervals. A guarantee-level-based adaptive regulation mechanism is developed to adjust ecological-flow allocation under different hydrological conditions. The model was applied to the Shaanxi reach of the Wei River mainstream. The results show that ecological-flow intervals generally increase from upstream to downstream and are higher during the flood season than during the non-flood season. The dominant contributors to ecological-flow requirements differed between upstream and downstream reaches, with environmental-protection demand accounting for 64.6%–78.6% of the upper ecological-flow limits at upstream sections and sediment-transport demand accounting for up to 98.0% downstream. Under moderately dry conditions, lower ecological-flow limits generally achieved high guarantee levels, whereas upper ecological-flow limits associated with ecological-service demands showed greater seasonal variability. Under extremely dry conditions, the reliability of upper ecological-flow limits decreased, particularly in downstream reaches, although adaptive regulation improved the guarantee levels of high-priority ecological-service demands. Compared with conventional fixed-threshold ecological-flow approaches, the proposed model provides a more adaptive representation by integrating hydrological regime shifts, ecological-service demands, and reach-scale water losses, thereby supporting ecological-flow management in regulated and water-scarce river systems.
SN - 1470-160X
SN - 1872-7034
ER -