Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Practical Advantages of Online Conformal Prediction for Data Streams

Abstract

Full conformal prediction offers finite-sample marginal coverage guarantees under exchangeability, but exact computation can be costly, while its classical guarantees do not directly extend to non-stationary data streams. We compare four sequential conformal regression procedures with a weighted full-conformal benchmark in terms of empirical coverage, prediction interval width, and computational cost. The procedures combine ordinary or forgetting-factor least squares with uniform or exponentially weighted empirical residual quantiles, or with online gradient-based quantile tracking. Experiments cover an independent and identically distributed control, two synthetic distribution-shift scenarios, and four real-world data streams. Adapting the regression model as well as the conformal threshold substantially improves the coverage--width tradeoff under drift. The quantile-tracking procedure requires O(p2) time and memory per observation, independently of stream length, although its coverage can deteriorate after abrupt changes. These results illustrate the practical tradeoffs between predictor adaptation, uncertainty quantification, and computational resources.

Related

  1. Online Conformal Prediction for Non-Exchangeable Panel Data
    Daohong Tu, Kay Giesecke
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Efficient conformal prediction intervals for time series: Online PID-Expert aggregation
    Guodong Liu, Yanfei Kang, Ren Miao +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Fitness advantages, prediction of resistances and protocol design: exploiting the synergy between mathematical modelling and statistics
    Giulia Chiari
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsarXiv
  4. Sequential Probability Ratio Test using Z-Statistics (SPRT-z): A Practical Approach for Online Experimentation
    Derek L. Ho, Emma G. Thomas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Conformal Annotation with Randomized Expert Review: Application to Online Cell-Type Labeling
    Xuhe Zhang, Zhi Huang, Ying Jin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chretien2026practical,
  title = {{Practical Advantages of Online Conformal Prediction for Data Streams}},
  author = {Stéphane Chrétien and Maryam Hoseini-Behbahani and Guillaume Metzler},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27740},
  eprint = {2610.27740},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27740},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Practical Advantages of Online Conformal Prediction for Data Streams
AU  - Stéphane Chrétien
AU  - Maryam Hoseini-Behbahani
AU  - Guillaume Metzler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27740
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27740
AB  - Full conformal prediction offers finite-sample marginal coverage guarantees under exchangeability, but exact computation can be costly, while its classical guarantees do not directly extend to non-stationary data streams. We compare four sequential conformal regression procedures with a weighted full-conformal benchmark in terms of empirical coverage, prediction interval width, and computational cost. The procedures combine ordinary or forgetting-factor least squares with uniform or exponentially weighted empirical residual quantiles, or with online gradient-based quantile tracking. Experiments cover an independent and identically distributed control, two synthetic distribution-shift scenarios, and four real-world data streams. Adapting the regression model as well as the conformal threshold substantially improves the coverage--width tradeoff under drift. The quantile-tracking procedure requires O(p^2) time and memory per observation, independently of stream length, although its coverage can deteriorate after abrupt changes. These results illustrate the practical tradeoffs between predictor adaptation, uncertainty quantification, and computational resources.
ER  -