Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Efficient conformal prediction intervals for time series: Online PID-Expert aggregation

Abstract

For a given point forecaster, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) calibration configurations can attain similar overall coverage yet produce different interval widths. We introduce PID-Expert, an online aggregation method for improving the efficiency of conformal prediction intervals for time series. PID-Expert combines thresholds from a fixed library of PID calibrators, each evolving under its own coverage feedback. Aggregation weights depend on normalized interval width and miscoverage, while a shared multiplier adapts the miscoverage penalty using feedback from the reported interval. We establish local regret bounds for weighted expert losses under the realized multiplier sequence and, separately, a pathwise upper bound on time-averaged aggregate miscoverage, with control in expectation and almost surely under a stability condition. Across four simulation settings and two real-data applications, PID-Expert produces narrower mean intervals than a prespecified Conformal PID benchmark while keeping overall empirical coverage close to the nominal level. Compared with expert selection and equal averaging, aggregation generally provides a more balanced coverage--width trade-off across forecasting settings. Rolling analyses further reveal local coverage--efficiency trade-offs, particularly following abrupt distributional shifts. Overall, PID-Expert reduces reliance on a single PID configuration while improving interval efficiency.

Related

  1. CASCADE Conformal Prediction: Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Intervals for Two-Stage Clinical Decision Support
    Ricardo Diaz-Rincon, Muxuan Liang, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. PRESCCO: Efficient Prediction Intervals under a Right-Censored Covariate
    Kihyun Han, Yanyuan Ma, Karen Marder +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Volatility-Corrected Prediction Intervals: Locally Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification for Probabilistic Time-Series Forecasting
    Jason B. Cho, David S. Matteson
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Valid and Efficient Split Conformal Regression for Time Series
    Percy S. Zhai, Maggie Cheng, Wei Biao Wu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Conformal Prediction for Time Series with Deep Sequence Models
    Junghwan Lee, Jonghyeok Lee, Yao Xie
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026efficient,
  title = {{Efficient conformal prediction intervals for time series: Online PID-Expert aggregation}},
  author = {Guodong Liu and Yanfei Kang and Ren Miao and Xiaoqian Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02777},
  eprint = {2610.02777},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02777},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Efficient conformal prediction intervals for time series: Online PID-Expert aggregation
AU  - Guodong Liu
AU  - Yanfei Kang
AU  - Ren Miao
AU  - Xiaoqian Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02777
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02777
AB  - For a given point forecaster, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) calibration configurations can attain similar overall coverage yet produce different interval widths. We introduce PID-Expert, an online aggregation method for improving the efficiency of conformal prediction intervals for time series. PID-Expert combines thresholds from a fixed library of PID calibrators, each evolving under its own coverage feedback. Aggregation weights depend on normalized interval width and miscoverage, while a shared multiplier adapts the miscoverage penalty using feedback from the reported interval. We establish local regret bounds for weighted expert losses under the realized multiplier sequence and, separately, a pathwise upper bound on time-averaged aggregate miscoverage, with control in expectation and almost surely under a stability condition. Across four simulation settings and two real-data applications, PID-Expert produces narrower mean intervals than a prespecified Conformal PID benchmark while keeping overall empirical coverage close to the nominal level. Compared with expert selection and equal averaging, aggregation generally provides a more balanced coverage--width trade-off across forecasting settings. Rolling analyses further reveal local coverage--efficiency trade-offs, particularly following abrupt distributional shifts. Overall, PID-Expert reduces reliance on a single PID configuration while improving interval efficiency.
ER  -