PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
Travel photo authenticity: why one detector score is never enough
Abstract
Travel photo authenticity: one detector score is never enough; the 12% figure reflects unaided human viewing, so require two independent evidence families.
Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://itraveledthere.io/blog/travel-photo-authenticity-why-one-detector-score-is-never-enough.php
Related
- AI travel photography authenticity: 2026 depth map verification vs. AI fakes
- Beyond General Prosocial Behavior: Nature Connectedness, Authenticity, and Instrumental Prosocial Behavior in Late Childhood
- Recent applications of DSC and TGA in food quality control and authenticity verification: Current progress and future directions
- From authenticity ecosystems to human–AI hybrid societies
- Quality and Authenticity Evaluation of Red Yeast Rice Food Supplements from the Bulgarian Market
BibTeX
@misc{harrison2026travel,
title = {{Travel photo authenticity: why one detector score is never enough}},
author = {Owen Harrison},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23429633},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23429633},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Travel photo authenticity: why one detector score is never enough
AU - Owen Harrison
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23429633
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23429633
AB - Travel photo authenticity: one detector score is never enough; the 12% figure reflects unaided human viewing, so require two independent evidence families. Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://itraveledthere.io/blog/travel-photo-authenticity-why-one-detector-score-is-never-enough.php
ER -