Influence of GO, MXene, and MoS₂ on sodium alginate–polyacrylic acid hydrogels for forward osmosis groundwater treatment
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Khalifa University
- 2The Research & Innovation Center for Graphene and 2D Materials (RIC-2D), Khalifa University
- 3Electron Microscopy Core Labs, Khalifa University
- 4Center for Membrane and Advanced Water Technologies (CMAT), Khalifa University
Abstract
Hydrogels have emerged as promising draw agents for forward osmosis due to their high-water uptake capacity and their polymeric structure which may reduce reverse solute transport compared with conventional dissolved draw solutes. While graphene oxide (GO) has previously demonstrated potential for enhancing hydrogel performance, the effects of other emerging 2D materials such as Ti₃C₂Tₓ MXene and MoS₂ on hydrogel-based draw agents remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this work investigates the influence of incorporating different 2D materials into sodium alginate–polyacrylic acid hydrogels dedicated to forward osmosis groundwater treatment. Eight hydrogels were prepared, where one was used as a control hydrogel (HG-1) that did not contain any 2D materials, while the other seven hydrogels (HG-2 to HG-8) contained either one, two, or all the 2D materials synthesized in this work. All the 8 hydrogels were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray elemental mapping, swelling ratio tests, and compressive strength tests. Moreover, the water tests of the hydrogels were implemented using two feeds: deionized water (DI water) and groundwater. The GO-containing hydrogel HG-2 had the best performance among all the other hydrogels, drawing water at 0.581 ± 0.012 LMH when the DI water feed was used and 0.451 ± 0.029 LMH when the groundwater feed was used. The collected water products were analyzed to inspect the removal of the salinity and hardness of the ions from the groundwater feed, and the FO-membrane–hydrogel system produced water with high reductions in salinity and hardness. Lastly, a partial gate-to-gate life cycle assessment was conducted for the best-performing HG-2 formulation to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the hydrogel synthesis stage, excluding the synthesis of the 2D materials.
Related
- Decoupling Network Architecture and Sorption Mechanisms in Cellulose–Alginate and Carboxymethylcellulose–Alginate Hydrogels
- Lignocellulose-based hydrogels for environmental remediation: Structure-function relationships, adsorption mechanism, and pathways towards sustainable water treatment
- Removal of Cu(II) and a PET Glitter Microplastic Surrogate by Alginate, Alginate–Opuntia, and Chitosan-Treated Alginate–Opuntia Beads
- CTAB-functionalized clinoptilolite alginate microbeads for enhanced Congo Red adsorption: performance, kinetics and equilibrium analysis
- Anthropogenic groundwater declines may exert far-reaching climatic impacts
BibTeX
@article{aboulella2026influence,
title = {{Influence of GO, MXene, and MoS₂ on sodium alginate–polyacrylic acid hydrogels for forward osmosis groundwater treatment}},
author = {Ahmed Mamdouh Aboulella and Abdallah Kamal and Mohamed I. Helal and Adetunji Alabi and Maryam R. Al Shehhi and Kin Liao and Emad Alhseinat},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-63703-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63703-9},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Influence of GO, MXene, and MoS₂ on sodium alginate–polyacrylic acid hydrogels for forward osmosis groundwater treatment
AU - Ahmed Mamdouh Aboulella
AU - Abdallah Kamal
AU - Mohamed I. Helal
AU - Adetunji Alabi
AU - Maryam R. Al Shehhi
AU - Kin Liao
AU - Emad Alhseinat
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-63703-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63703-9
AB - Hydrogels have emerged as promising draw agents for forward osmosis due to their high-water uptake capacity and their polymeric structure which may reduce reverse solute transport compared with conventional dissolved draw solutes. While graphene oxide (GO) has previously demonstrated potential for enhancing hydrogel performance, the effects of other emerging 2D materials such as Ti₃C₂Tₓ MXene and MoS₂ on hydrogel-based draw agents remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this work investigates the influence of incorporating different 2D materials into sodium alginate–polyacrylic acid hydrogels dedicated to forward osmosis groundwater treatment. Eight hydrogels were prepared, where one was used as a control hydrogel (HG-1) that did not contain any 2D materials, while the other seven hydrogels (HG-2 to HG-8) contained either one, two, or all the 2D materials synthesized in this work. All the 8 hydrogels were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray elemental mapping, swelling ratio tests, and compressive strength tests. Moreover, the water tests of the hydrogels were implemented using two feeds: deionized water (DI water) and groundwater. The GO-containing hydrogel HG-2 had the best performance among all the other hydrogels, drawing water at 0.581 ± 0.012 LMH when the DI water feed was used and 0.451 ± 0.029 LMH when the groundwater feed was used. The collected water products were analyzed to inspect the removal of the salinity and hardness of the ions from the groundwater feed, and the FO-membrane–hydrogel system produced water with high reductions in salinity and hardness. Lastly, a partial gate-to-gate life cycle assessment was conducted for the best-performing HG-2 formulation to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the hydrogel synthesis stage, excluding the synthesis of the 2D materials.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -