Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an expanded Chinese version of the training needs analysis questionnaire: evidence from rural-oriented general practitioners in Chongqing, China
5 affiliations
- 1Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 2Department of General Practice, Shangqingsi Community Health Service Center of Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China
- 3Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 4Renhe Community Health Center of Liangjiang New Area, Chongqing, China
- 5Department of Academic Affairs, College of General Practice (Fifth Clinical College), Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Abstract
Objectives: No validated instrument exists for assessing the training needs of rural-oriented general practitioners (GPs) in China. This study translated, cross-culturally adapted and expanded the Hennessy–Hicks Training Needs Analysis (HHTNA) questionnaire for this workforce and examined the psychometric properties of the resulting Chinese version (Ch-HHTNA).
Design: Two-phase instrument development and validation study: translation with a modified Delphi consensus exercise (September 2024 to January 2025), followed by a cross-sectional validation survey (February to April 2025).
Setting: Primary care in Chongqing, China, spanning three geographic regions: the central urban area, Three Gorges Reservoir area and Wuling Mountain area.
Participants: Rural-oriented GPs registered in general practice, employed in a primary care institution in Chongqing and graduates of the Rural-oriented Medical Students Training Project. Quota sampling yielded 420 distributed questionnaires, of which 401 (95.5%) were returned and 385 (96.0% of those returned) analysed (mean age 28.7 years, 57.4% female).
Outcome measures: Structural validity, internal consistency and criterion-related validity of the Ch-HHTNA and the item-level training-need difference (importance − proficiency).
Results: The Ch-HHTNA comprised 37 items. Principal axis factoring with promax rotation yielded five factors that accounted for 57.9% of the total items. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α 0.979 for scale A; category range, 0.841–0.958; split-half reliability, 0.953). Discrimination and content validity were adequate (corrected item-total correlation ≥0.30; scale-level content validity index, 0.992 and 0.996). Training-need gaps were largest for research-related tasks (writing reports: mean A − B 1.92, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.10).
Conclusions: The Ch-HHTNA is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the training needs of rural-oriented GPs in China and can inform the design of CME/CPD curricula. The adaptation procedure may serve as a methodological reference for comparable work elsewhere.
Related
- Cross-cultural adaptation of the Young Disability Questionnaire-Spine into Turkish for children with spinal pain: a methodological validation study
- Cultural adaptation and validation of the Suicidal Behaviours Questionnaire – Autism Spectrum Conditions (SBQ-ASC) for use in Brazil
- Cross-cultural adaptation and preliminary validation of the adolescent obesity environmental questionnaire (AOEQ) in LMICs: family, school, and peer contexts
- Persian version of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms caregiver module: translation, validation and cultural adaptation.
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Turkish Version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (SGRQ-I).
BibTeX
@article{huang2026crosscultural,
title = {{Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an expanded Chinese version of the training needs analysis questionnaire: evidence from rural-oriented general practitioners in Chongqing, China}},
author = {Xintao Huang and Haochen Yu and Mo Chen and Xingxin Deng and Min Tang and Huisheng Deng and Zhenrong Tang},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119190},
url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119190},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an expanded Chinese version of the training needs analysis questionnaire: evidence from rural-oriented general practitioners in Chongqing, China
AU - Xintao Huang
AU - Haochen Yu
AU - Mo Chen
AU - Xingxin Deng
AU - Min Tang
AU - Huisheng Deng
AU - Zhenrong Tang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119190
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119190
AB - Objectives: No validated instrument exists for assessing the training needs of rural-oriented general practitioners (GPs) in China. This study translated, cross-culturally adapted and expanded the Hennessy–Hicks Training Needs Analysis (HHTNA) questionnaire for this workforce and examined the psychometric properties of the resulting Chinese version (Ch-HHTNA). Design: Two-phase instrument development and validation study: translation with a modified Delphi consensus exercise (September 2024 to January 2025), followed by a cross-sectional validation survey (February to April 2025). Setting: Primary care in Chongqing, China, spanning three geographic regions: the central urban area, Three Gorges Reservoir area and Wuling Mountain area. Participants: Rural-oriented GPs registered in general practice, employed in a primary care institution in Chongqing and graduates of the Rural-oriented Medical Students Training Project. Quota sampling yielded 420 distributed questionnaires, of which 401 (95.5%) were returned and 385 (96.0% of those returned) analysed (mean age 28.7 years, 57.4% female). Outcome measures: Structural validity, internal consistency and criterion-related validity of the Ch-HHTNA and the item-level training-need difference (importance − proficiency). Results: The Ch-HHTNA comprised 37 items. Principal axis factoring with promax rotation yielded five factors that accounted for 57.9% of the total items. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s α 0.979 for scale A; category range, 0.841–0.958; split-half reliability, 0.953). Discrimination and content validity were adequate (corrected item-total correlation ≥0.30; scale-level content validity index, 0.992 and 0.996). Training-need gaps were largest for research-related tasks (writing reports: mean A − B 1.92, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.10). Conclusions: The Ch-HHTNA is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the training needs of rural-oriented GPs in China and can inform the design of CME/CPD curricula. The adaptation procedure may serve as a methodological reference for comparable work elsewhere.
SN - 2044-6055
SN - 2044-6055
ER -