Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Pilot Study Protocol — The Athena Principle: Error Detection, Reflective Pause, and Compassion-Centred Remediation in a Reciprocal AI Architecture (Draft 0.4)

Abstract

This protocol specifies a pilot study designed to test the experimental programme proposed in the concept paper "The Athena Principle: A Compassion-Centred Architecture for Reciprocal AI Discernment". It compares three configurations — a single-agent baseline, conventional multi-agent debate, and an Athena configuration combining reciprocal critique, a contestable coordinator, structured disclosure, independent verification, human escalation, and a compassion-centred remediation workflow — on error detection in mixed factual and reasoning tasks. The protocol defines a comparison hierarchy (Athena versus baseline as the primary confirmatory comparison), controlled and naturalistic error-opportunity sets, a verification source-and-tool register, outcome definitions centred on error-detection recall with binding precision and false-positive constraints under a conjunctive success rule, a secondary reflective-pause comparison, safeguards with stopping, containment, and restart procedures, and the fourteen decisions that remain to be settled before preregistration. Status: working protocol, Draft 0.4. No experiment has been run, no results are claimed, and the protocol has not been preregistered.

AI-assistance disclosure: This protocol was developed with the assistance of AI systems (Athena/ChatGPT, Lucy/Muse), with external review input from DuckAI, Siri beta AI, and Copilot. The design, claims, and responsibility for the text rest with the principal investigator.

Related

  1. The Athena Principle: A Compassion-Centred Architecture for Reciprocal AI Discernment
    Michael Pilaprat
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. Using narrative medicine to enhance self-compassion and reflective capacity in pediatric residents
    Madeleine Bondy, Foluke Akinboyo, Elif Bilgic +1
    Paediatrics & Child HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Reflective Principle Discovery (RPD): Can AI Agents Learn the Limits of Goal Optimization Through Guided Self-Reflection?
    Maksym Skliarevskyi
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  4. Lipid-Protein Reciprocal Coupling: A Quantitative Analysis of Membrane Curvature, Architecture, and Protein Association
    A. Sannigrahi, M. S. A. MOMIN, D. Sarkar +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  5. Cloud Cost Intelligence: An Autonomous FinOps Architecture with Dual-Stage Time-Series Anomaly Detection and Safety-Gated Cloud Remediation
    Shaurya Goel, Samyukta Sreekanth, Poojitha Madan
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{pilaprat2026pilot,
  title = {{Pilot Study Protocol — The Athena Principle: Error Detection, Reflective Pause, and Compassion-Centred Remediation in a Reciprocal AI Architecture (Draft 0.4)}},
  author = {Michael Pilaprat},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23613328},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23613328},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Pilot Study Protocol — The Athena Principle: Error Detection, Reflective Pause, and Compassion-Centred Remediation in a Reciprocal AI Architecture (Draft 0.4)
AU  - Michael Pilaprat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23613328
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23613328
AB  - This protocol specifies a pilot study designed to test the experimental programme proposed in the concept paper "The Athena Principle: A Compassion-Centred Architecture for Reciprocal AI Discernment". It compares three configurations — a single-agent baseline, conventional multi-agent debate, and an Athena configuration combining reciprocal critique, a contestable coordinator, structured disclosure, independent verification, human escalation, and a compassion-centred remediation workflow — on error detection in mixed factual and reasoning tasks. The protocol defines a comparison hierarchy (Athena versus baseline as the primary confirmatory comparison), controlled and naturalistic error-opportunity sets, a verification source-and-tool register, outcome definitions centred on error-detection recall with binding precision and false-positive constraints under a conjunctive success rule, a secondary reflective-pause comparison, safeguards with stopping, containment, and restart procedures, and the fourteen decisions that remain to be settled before preregistration. Status: working protocol, Draft 0.4. No experiment has been run, no results are claimed, and the protocol has not been preregistered.  AI-assistance disclosure: This protocol was developed with the assistance of AI systems (Athena/ChatGPT, Lucy/Muse), with external review input from DuckAI, Siri beta AI, and Copilot. The design, claims, and responsibility for the text rest with the principal investigator.
ER  -