Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC pediatrics

Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study.

  1. 1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, Bern, 3010, Switzerland. [email protected].
  2. 2Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.
  3. 3Frühchen & Neokinder Schweiz, Swiss non-profit organization of parents of preterm born children, Hinterer Schermen 29, Ittigen, 3063, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background

Value-laden decisions about life-sustaining treatment for critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) present profound emotional and ethical challenges for parents and clinicians. In such situations, clinicians must balance providing guidance with respecting parental autonomy. We explored parental perspectives on clinician guidance and effective communication during these decisions.Methods

We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis within a randomized clinical trial using parental free-text responses to a simulated neonatal decision-making scenario. The study was carried out online between February and April 2024 in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. Eligible participants were German-speaking parents of preterm infants with prior NICU experience, recruited through patient and parent organizations. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Results

Among 128 participants (84% female), parents emphasized the importance of clear, detailed, and evidence-based information about their child's condition and treatment options, as well as empathetic, honest, and individualized communication. They valued sufficient time for discussion and reflection, access to second opinions, and attention to the child's quality of life. Parents appeared to retain a sense of decision ownership, while differing in their preferences regarding clinician guidance. Some welcomed explicit recommendations, whereas others preferred neutral, value-sensitive communication that preserved space for independent deliberation.Conclusions

Parents facing complex medical decisions value both high-quality information and empathetic and honest communication. While they generally retain decision ownership, preferences regarding clinician guidance vary, suggesting that clinicians should actively explore how much direction parents want and tailor their communication accordingly.Trial registration

ISRCTN registry under number ISRCTN16123073, registration date: 17/01/2024, ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16123073 ).

Related

  1. Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
    Amber Bidner, Sandhya Maranna, Eva Bezak +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Ensuring quality in research, 'Authorship Effect' & Conflict of Interest. Response submitted to BMJ Mental Health in response to 'Clinician perspectives on the utility and acceptability of OxSATS: a qualitative study of a novel structured suicide risk assessment tool
    Alastair Cockburn, Karen Lascelles, Leah Quinlivan
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Parental perspectives on primary school-based health cohorts: A qualitative study in Greece
    M Chrysikou, A Sygkouna, G Papantoniou +4
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  4. Exploring How Staff Engage in Conversations Around Sexuality With Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
    Naoise Webb, Hannah O'Daly, Christine Linehan
    Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARIDPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Missed, Misclassified or Misunderstood? Clinician Perspectives on Congenital Uterine Anomalies in Australia and New Zealand
    Kyra Innis, Boon Lim, Julie Quinlivan +1
    The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{arnold2026parental,
  title = {{Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study.}},
  author = {Christine Arnold and Julian Eychmüller and Dina Hediger and Stephanie Vanessa Schmid and Sophie Jaisli and André Kidszun},
  journal = {BMC pediatrics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12887-026-07304-5},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928158},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study.
AU  - Christine Arnold
AU  - Julian Eychmüller
AU  - Dina Hediger
AU  - Stephanie Vanessa Schmid
AU  - Sophie Jaisli
AU  - André Kidszun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/28
JO  - BMC pediatrics
DO  - 10.1186/s12887-026-07304-5
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928158
AB  - Background  Value-laden decisions about life-sustaining treatment for critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) present profound emotional and ethical challenges for parents and clinicians. In such situations, clinicians must balance providing guidance with respecting parental autonomy. We explored parental perspectives on clinician guidance and effective communication during these decisions.Methods  We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis within a randomized clinical trial using parental free-text responses to a simulated neonatal decision-making scenario. The study was carried out online between February and April 2024 in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. Eligible participants were German-speaking parents of preterm infants with prior NICU experience, recruited through patient and parent organizations. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Results  Among 128 participants (84% female), parents emphasized the importance of clear, detailed, and evidence-based information about their child's condition and treatment options, as well as empathetic, honest, and individualized communication. They valued sufficient time for discussion and reflection, access to second opinions, and attention to the child's quality of life. Parents appeared to retain a sense of decision ownership, while differing in their preferences regarding clinician guidance. Some welcomed explicit recommendations, whereas others preferred neutral, value-sensitive communication that preserved space for independent deliberation.Conclusions  Parents facing complex medical decisions value both high-quality information and empathetic and honest communication. While they generally retain decision ownership, preferences regarding clinician guidance vary, suggesting that clinicians should actively explore how much direction parents want and tailor their communication accordingly.Trial registration  ISRCTN registry under number ISRCTN16123073, registration date: 17/01/2024, ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16123073 ).
SN  - 1471-2431
ER  -