A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on frailty in older adults
- 1School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University , ,
- 2Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College , , ,
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize randomized evidence on unimodal resistance exercise, walking, and Tai Chi for frailty in older adults and to explore whether intervention characteristics may help explain between-study heterogeneity. Unlike broader reviews of multicomponent or non-pharmacological interventions, this review focuses on these three standalone modalities and reports modality- and dose-characteristic subgroup estimates.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251179862). Five databases were searched from inception to October 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane tool. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled using inverse-variance models; random-effects models were used when substantial heterogeneity was present. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined exercise modality and intervention characteristics. Leave-one-comparison-out sensitivity analysis was used to assess influence. Funnel-plot findings were considered exploratory because few comparisons were available.
Results: Ten articles contributed 13 eligible exercise-control comparisons comprising 1,361 participant observations (682 intervention and 679 control). The overall random-effects estimate favored exercise (SMD = −0.57, 95% CI −0.91 to −0.24), but heterogeneity was substantial ( I ² = 88%) and the approximate 95% prediction interval crossed the null (−1.73 to 0.57). Resistance-exercise comparisons showed a significant pooled association with lower frailty scores (SMD = −0.78, 95% CI −1.22 to −0.35), whereas walking and Tai Chi estimates were imprecise and not statistically significant. Leave-one-comparison-out estimates remained in the same direction (SMD range, −0.65 to −0.46), although heterogeneity remained high. Dose-characteristic subgroup findings were based on small numbers of comparisons and should be regarded as exploratory rather than as evidence of an optimal prescription.
Conclusion: Resistance-exercise trials showed a significant pooled reduction in frailty scores, but the available evidence does not establish superiority over walking or Tai Chi because no direct head-to-head or network comparison was performed. High heterogeneity, imprecise modality subgroups, and sparse dose strata limit certainty. The dose-related findings should be used to generate hypotheses for adequately powered comparative trials rather than to prescribe an optimal regimen.
Related
- Comparative effects of different exercise training modalities on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Comparative effects of different exercise modalities and doses on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with Bayesian dose-response network meta-analysis.
- Comparative efficacy of different exercise modalities on renal function and glycemic control in patients with non-dialysis diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Comparative effects of exercise modalities on sleep quality in middle-aged and older adults with sleep disorders: A systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-responsemeta-analyses.
- Comparative effects of exercise modalities on visceral adipose tissue in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{li2026systematic,
title = {{A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on frailty in older adults}},
author = {Jiahao Li and Huizhi Yang and Lili Chen},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1931299},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13674345},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on frailty in older adults
AU - Jiahao Li
AU - Huizhi Yang
AU - Lili Chen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1931299
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13674345
AB - Objective: To synthesize randomized evidence on unimodal resistance exercise, walking, and Tai Chi for frailty in older adults and to explore whether intervention characteristics may help explain between-study heterogeneity. Unlike broader reviews of multicomponent or non-pharmacological interventions, this review focuses on these three standalone modalities and reports modality- and dose-characteristic subgroup estimates. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251179862). Five databases were searched from inception to October 2025. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane tool. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled using inverse-variance models; random-effects models were used when substantial heterogeneity was present. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined exercise modality and intervention characteristics. Leave-one-comparison-out sensitivity analysis was used to assess influence. Funnel-plot findings were considered exploratory because few comparisons were available. Results: Ten articles contributed 13 eligible exercise-control comparisons comprising 1,361 participant observations (682 intervention and 679 control). The overall random-effects estimate favored exercise (SMD = −0.57, 95% CI −0.91 to −0.24), but heterogeneity was substantial ( I ² = 88%) and the approximate 95% prediction interval crossed the null (−1.73 to 0.57). Resistance-exercise comparisons showed a significant pooled association with lower frailty scores (SMD = −0.78, 95% CI −1.22 to −0.35), whereas walking and Tai Chi estimates were imprecise and not statistically significant. Leave-one-comparison-out estimates remained in the same direction (SMD range, −0.65 to −0.46), although heterogeneity remained high. Dose-characteristic subgroup findings were based on small numbers of comparisons and should be regarded as exploratory rather than as evidence of an optimal prescription. Conclusion: Resistance-exercise trials showed a significant pooled reduction in frailty scores, but the available evidence does not establish superiority over walking or Tai Chi because no direct head-to-head or network comparison was performed. High heterogeneity, imprecise modality subgroups, and sparse dose strata limit certainty. The dose-related findings should be used to generate hypotheses for adequately powered comparative trials rather than to prescribe an optimal regimen.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -