Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire for use in Pakistan

4 affiliations
  1. 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  2. 2Aga Khan University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Karachi, Pakistan
  3. 3The Indus Hospital, Opposite Darussalam Society, Karachi, Pakistan
  4. 4York University, North York, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Several tools measure the Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of people with chronic illnesses but evidence on their cross-cultural adaptation is limited. This study performed the cross-cultural adaptation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) for use with Urdu speakers in Pakistan, while documenting the adaptation process in detail. This methodological study employed a structured cross-cultural adaptation and linguistic validation design. We incorporated a Delphi Pannel to the MAPI Research Trusts’ 5-step linguistic validation process. Two forward translators independently adapted and reconciled the Indian Urdu version of the MLHFQ for use in Pakistan. Using a modified Delphi approach comprising three Heart Failure patients and one cardiologist reviewed the translation for linguistic accuracy, cultural relevance, and comprehensiveness, identified problems and provided feedback that informed the Pakistani Urdu version 1.0. Two independent back translators translated version 1.0 back to English. The Principal Investigator and back translators reconciled back-translations and proposed changes that were approved by forward translators. Translations, reconciliation reports, and Delphi panel feedback were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis, resulting in four themes describing the methodological challenges and adaptation strategies encountered during cross-cultural adaptation: (1) direct transferring of compatible words from the Indian Urdu version to Pakistani Urdu version of the MLHFQ, (2) using indirect substitutes for words lacking direct Urdu equivalents, (3) balancing the tone of written and spoken Urdu, and (4) incorporating contextual nuances within each element of the tool. This study successfully adapted the MLHFQ for Urdu-speaking patients with Heart Failure in Pakistan while systematically documenting the linguistic, cultural, and contextual challenges encountered throughout the adaptation process. The findings offer valuable methodological insights for researchers adapting HRQOL tools and provide quality evidence regarding the use of the MLHFQ for use with Urdu speakers in Pakistan.

Related

  1. Persian version of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms caregiver module: translation, validation and cultural adaptation.
    Mahdi Norouzi, Elham Aghaei, Farshid Alizadeh +3
    BMC pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Turkish Version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (SGRQ-I).
    Esra Pehlivan, Zeynep Betül Özcan, Cahidenur Koçak +7
    Thoracic research and practicePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the NASA-TLX questionnaire among various occupational groups of Persian speakers
    Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia, Mehrnaz Noshadha, Zahra Rafat +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Preliminary Validation of the Persian Version of the Assessment of Medical Education Environment by Teachers (AMEET) Questionnaire
    Taraneh Movahhed, Neda Eslami, Ali Asgharian Yami +2
    Advances in Medical Education and PracticePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  5. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Young Disability Questionnaire-Spine into Turkish for children with spinal pain: a methodological validation study
    Abdullah İyigün, Caner Günerbüyük, Pervin Demir +3
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gowani2026translation,
  title = {{Translation and cultural adaptation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire for use in Pakistan}},
  author = {Ambreen Gowani and Colleen Norris and Gail Low and Khairulnissa Ajani and Ahmed Noor and Matthias Hoben},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360245},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360245},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Translation and cultural adaptation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire for use in Pakistan
AU  - Ambreen Gowani
AU  - Colleen Norris
AU  - Gail Low
AU  - Khairulnissa Ajani
AU  - Ahmed Noor
AU  - Matthias Hoben
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360245
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360245
AB  - Several tools measure the Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of people with chronic illnesses but evidence on their cross-cultural adaptation is limited. This study performed the cross-cultural adaptation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) for use with Urdu speakers in Pakistan, while documenting the adaptation process in detail. This methodological study employed a structured cross-cultural adaptation and linguistic validation design. We incorporated a Delphi Pannel to the MAPI Research Trusts’ 5-step linguistic validation process. Two forward translators independently adapted and reconciled the Indian Urdu version of the MLHFQ for use in Pakistan. Using a modified Delphi approach comprising three Heart Failure patients and one cardiologist reviewed the translation for linguistic accuracy, cultural relevance, and comprehensiveness, identified problems and provided feedback that informed the Pakistani Urdu version 1.0. Two independent back translators translated version 1.0 back to English. The Principal Investigator and back translators reconciled back-translations and proposed changes that were approved by forward translators. Translations, reconciliation reports, and Delphi panel feedback were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis, resulting in four themes describing the methodological challenges and adaptation strategies encountered during cross-cultural adaptation: (1) direct transferring of compatible words from the Indian Urdu version to Pakistani Urdu version of the MLHFQ, (2) using indirect substitutes for words lacking direct Urdu equivalents, (3) balancing the tone of written and spoken Urdu, and (4) incorporating contextual nuances within each element of the tool. This study successfully adapted the MLHFQ for Urdu-speaking patients with Heart Failure in Pakistan while systematically documenting the linguistic, cultural, and contextual challenges encountered throughout the adaptation process. The findings offer valuable methodological insights for researchers adapting HRQOL tools and provide quality evidence regarding the use of the MLHFQ for use with Urdu speakers in Pakistan.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -