Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.
Abstract
Scientific assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services are challenged by the need to examine systemic drivers of change while maintaining support in a polarized political climate. Recent US national policy shifts that reduce federal support for scientific assessments underscore the necessity of a broad-based, resilient, and scalable assessment framework with sustained engagement of conservation practitioners from academia, non-governmental organizations, and subnational governments. Such an information ecosystem would integrate spatial data relevant to practitioners from national to regional extents with case studies of place-based strategies and mechanisms for framing local successes within national objectives. Subnational initiatives such as the Florida Wildlife Corridor and Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy provide examples of ambitious, science-informed conservation assessments developed and implemented with both governmental and public support. Engaging a diversity of participants and ensuring greater salience across scales are complementary approaches to strengthening the effectiveness of assessments. Sustaining non-governmental capacity for engagement with the assessment process requires improved models of collaboration, altered academic reward structures, and diverse sources of funding. Improved integration of national-scale data in subnational assessments can strengthen existing models, including state and provincial biodiversity strategies, and support the synthesis of currently fragmented spatial data on biodiversity distribution, threats, and conservation priorities. Stronger linkages between narrative assessments and spatial data, between spatial data and place-based action, and between public engagement with the assessment process and local conservation initiatives can ensure a diverse, resilient support system for biodiversity data development, synthesis, and application that produces actionable knowledge to support place-based conservation.
Related
- Nested paradoxes around how biodiversity constrains business: Why biodiversity conservation requires paradox thinking
- An unexploited almond biodiversity in central Italy: Genetic characterization and conservation strategies using molecular markers
- The conservation effectiveness of Indigenous and local community governance
- Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: a review of medicinal plants in Conservation Units in Sergipe, Brazil
- The Inventorium: a tool to catalogue biodiversity conservation actions on INRAE sites
BibTeX
@misc{carroll2026building,
title = {{Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.}},
author = {Carlos Carroll and Asena Goren and Thomas Hoctor and Reed Noss and Lindsay Dreiss and Daniel Rohlf},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.32942/x2r70v},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15209/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.
AU - Carlos Carroll
AU - Asena Goren
AU - Thomas Hoctor
AU - Reed Noss
AU - Lindsay Dreiss
AU - Daniel Rohlf
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2r70v
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15209/
AB - Scientific assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services are challenged by the need to examine systemic drivers of change while maintaining support in a polarized political climate. Recent US national policy shifts that reduce federal support for scientific assessments underscore the necessity of a broad-based, resilient, and scalable assessment framework with sustained engagement of conservation practitioners from academia, non-governmental organizations, and subnational governments. Such an information ecosystem would integrate spatial data relevant to practitioners from national to regional extents with case studies of place-based strategies and mechanisms for framing local successes within national objectives. Subnational initiatives such as the Florida Wildlife Corridor and Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy provide examples of ambitious, science-informed conservation assessments developed and implemented with both governmental and public support. Engaging a diversity of participants and ensuring greater salience across scales are complementary approaches to strengthening the effectiveness of assessments. Sustaining non-governmental capacity for engagement with the assessment process requires improved models of collaboration, altered academic reward structures, and diverse sources of funding. Improved integration of national-scale data in subnational assessments can strengthen existing models, including state and provincial biodiversity strategies, and support the synthesis of currently fragmented spatial data on biodiversity distribution, threats, and conservation priorities. Stronger linkages between narrative assessments and spatial data, between spatial data and place-based action, and between public engagement with the assessment process and local conservation initiatives can ensure a diverse, resilient support system for biodiversity data development, synthesis, and application that produces actionable knowledge to support place-based conservation.
ER -