The conservation effectiveness of Indigenous and local community governance

Abstract

Effective governance of natural areas is central to conserving biodiversity and Earth's life support systems, including climate regulation and food and water provisioning. Understanding the relative effectiveness of different governance options is thus critical. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 409 cases in 42 countries, comparing ecological outcomes over time in areas governed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities versus conventional governance approaches. Outcomes in community-governed areas matched those in conventional fully protected areas and exceeded those in partially protected and unprotected areas. Communities with legal land title had better outcomes than communities without title. We provide the strongest evidence to date that ecological outcomes of Indigenous and community governance meet or exceed those of other area-based conservation approaches and that titling strengthens these outcomes.

Collective interests, health research ethics and data governance for Indigenous Sámi populations
Susanna Ragnhild Andersdatter Siri, Christina Storm Mienna, Per Axelsson
PLOS Medicine14 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
Advancing Marine Mammal Conservation Through Omics Tools and Integration of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge
Isabella M. Reeves, Gabrielle Genty, Alana Alexander +30
Molecular ecology1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.
Carlos Carroll, Asena Goren, Thomas Hoctor +3
EcoEvoRxiv28 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcology Evolutionary biologyEcoEvoRxiv
Exploring Human‐Wildlife Coexistence Through the Lens of Value Pluralism Among Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs)
Anuradhi Dulangi Jayasinghe, Georgette Leah Burns, Duan Biggs
Ecology and evolution1 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMCCrossref
Genomic insights into local adaptation of indigenous chickens
Jing-Wei Yuan, Xiao-Xu Jia, Xiao-Long Huang +9
Zoological Research18 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedGenetics & genomicsPMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{zavaleta2026conservation,
  title = {{The conservation effectiveness of Indigenous and local community governance}},
  author = {E. S. Zavaleta and C. E. Wilkinson and K. Zilliacus and B. C. McLaughlin and B. R. Tershy and J. P. R. M. Clark and R. Faust},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.12.758350},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758350v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - The conservation effectiveness of Indigenous and local community governance
AU  - E. S. Zavaleta
AU  - C. E. Wilkinson
AU  - K. Zilliacus
AU  - B. C. McLaughlin
AU  - B. R. Tershy
AU  - J. P. R. M. Clark
AU  - R. Faust
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.12.758350
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758350v1
AB  - Effective governance of natural areas is central to conserving biodiversity and Earth's life support systems, including climate regulation and food and water provisioning. Understanding the relative effectiveness of different governance options is thus critical. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 409 cases in 42 countries, comparing ecological outcomes over time in areas governed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities versus conventional governance approaches. Outcomes in community-governed areas matched those in conventional fully protected areas and exceeded those in partially protected and unprotected areas. Communities with legal land title had better outcomes than communities without title. We provide the strongest evidence to date that ecological outcomes of Indigenous and community governance meet or exceed those of other area-based conservation approaches and that titling strengthens these outcomes.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite