Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Species distribution models of ESA-listed corals highlight niche differences among taxa that may guide recovery planning

Abstract

Understanding the biogeography of living marine resources is essential for informed management, particularly in data-limited environments. Here, we use two corals listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) around Tutuila, American Samoa, to evaluate a transferable workflow that combines presence-only occurrence records, open biodiversity repositories, and open-access environmental data to extend existing survey records and support species monitoring. We developed ensemble maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models for two Indo-Pacific corals, Acropora globiceps and Isopora crateriformis , using multi-source occurrence records collected from 2007 to 2025. Dynamic environmental predictors, including thermal stress, water clarity, and wind variability, were derived from open-access satellite datasets and temporally summarized to match field sampling dates, while static predictors represented seafloor structure and land-based stressors. To evaluate one-year-ahead forecast performance, we trained models on records through 2024, generated 2025 relative habitat-suitability forecasts using lagged 2024 environmental summaries, and evaluated them against independent 2025 observations. The 2025 forecasts showed moderate discrimination under temporal validation, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.74 for A. globiceps and 0.71 for I. crateriformis . The models revealed contrasting realized niches: A. globiceps was associated with shallower, rugose habitats and specific thermal-history conditions, whereas I. crateriformis showed highest suitability at intermediate depths and appeared more constrained by thermal variability. These results suggest that occurrence-based SDMs can help distinguish species-specific habitat associations and guide monitoring or spatial prioritization, while remaining best interpreted as relative habitat suitability rather than definitive forecasts of occurrence. Because the workflow relies on presence-only records and open-access environmental data, it can be adapted to other taxa, regions, and applied questions where field data are limited.

Related

  1. Root Exudate Chemotypes and Soil Improvement in Orchard Green Manures: Species-Specific Associations Reflecting Family-Level Phylogenetic Differences
    Minghao Sun, Xing Shen, Yongjie Liu +2
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Differences in the management of intracellular redox state between wine yeast species dictate their fermentation performances and metabolite production
    Viwe Tyibilika, Mathabatha Setati, Audrey Bloem +2
    International Journal of Food MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text20 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Species-specific sensorimotor noise levels explain saccadic suppression strength differences between macaques and zebrafish
    Giulia Soto, Florian A. Dehmelt, Matthias P. Baumann +5
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationNeuroscienceCell PressCrossref
  4. Species Distribution, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Optimal Therapies Against Candida Species
    P. Paik, R. tilak, P. Tiwari +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. Distribution dataset of chondrichthyan species occurring in French metropolitan waters and across the North-East Atlantic
    Amaëlle Bisch, Pauline Stephan, Sophie Elliott +10
    Biodiversity Data JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{tanaka2026species,
  title = {{Species distribution models of ESA-listed corals highlight niche differences among taxa that may guide recovery planning}},
  author = {Kisei R. Tanaka and Thomas A. Oliver and Courtney S. Couch and Andrew A. Shantz and Kira Turnham and Edoardo Sena and Jessica N. Perelman and Brittany E. Huntington},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-73904-x},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73904-x},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Species distribution models of ESA-listed corals highlight niche differences among taxa that may guide recovery planning
AU  - Kisei R. Tanaka
AU  - Thomas A. Oliver
AU  - Courtney S. Couch
AU  - Andrew A. Shantz
AU  - Kira Turnham
AU  - Edoardo Sena
AU  - Jessica N. Perelman
AU  - Brittany E. Huntington
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-73904-x
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-73904-x
AB  - Understanding the biogeography of living marine resources is essential for informed management, particularly in data-limited environments. Here, we use two corals listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) around Tutuila, American Samoa, to evaluate a transferable workflow that combines presence-only occurrence records, open biodiversity repositories, and open-access environmental data to extend existing survey records and support species monitoring. We developed ensemble maximum entropy (MaxEnt) models for two Indo-Pacific corals, Acropora globiceps and Isopora crateriformis , using multi-source occurrence records collected from 2007 to 2025. Dynamic environmental predictors, including thermal stress, water clarity, and wind variability, were derived from open-access satellite datasets and temporally summarized to match field sampling dates, while static predictors represented seafloor structure and land-based stressors. To evaluate one-year-ahead forecast performance, we trained models on records through 2024, generated 2025 relative habitat-suitability forecasts using lagged 2024 environmental summaries, and evaluated them against independent 2025 observations. The 2025 forecasts showed moderate discrimination under temporal validation, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.74 for A. globiceps and 0.71 for I. crateriformis . The models revealed contrasting realized niches: A. globiceps was associated with shallower, rugose habitats and specific thermal-history conditions, whereas I. crateriformis showed highest suitability at intermediate depths and appeared more constrained by thermal variability. These results suggest that occurrence-based SDMs can help distinguish species-specific habitat associations and guide monitoring or spatial prioritization, while remaining best interpreted as relative habitat suitability rather than definitive forecasts of occurrence. Because the workflow relies on presence-only records and open-access environmental data, it can be adapted to other taxa, regions, and applied questions where field data are limited.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -