Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Short-term decongestion and clinical benefit in acute heart failure: a systematic review and trial-level meta-regression

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, the Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People’s Hospital

Abstract

Background: Body weight, urine output, urinary sodium, and ultrasound findings are frequently used as early trial endpoints in acute heart failure (AHF). However, patient-level prognostic associations with residual congestion do not establish the fact that treatment-induced marker improvement predicts fewer deaths or heart failure events.

Objectives: The objectives of this work are to pair short-term decongestion and subsequent clinical treatment effects within the same randomized comparisons, explore the trial-level association for body weight, and qualitatively assess non-weight markers.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, OpenAlex, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched through 18 July 2026. Eligible randomized adult AHF trials reported an objective decongestion effect and ≥30-day mortality, heart failure events, or rehospitalization. The amended primary marker was weight change at 24–96 h (original window, 48–96 h); clinical effects were log hazard or risk ratios. An errors-in-variables meta-regression model used 10,000 trial cluster bootstrap fits and trial-level jackknife intervals.

Results: Twenty-four trials (27 reports) were accepted for qualitative synthesis; the primary analysis included 12 comparisons from only 10 independent trials. Endpoints, follow-up (30–302 days), effect measures, and mechanisms were heterogeneous. Each additional 1-kg between-group difference in weight loss corresponded to a clinical effect ratio of 0.74 (percentile 95% interval, 0.56–1.26; jackknife, 0.49–1.11). The pharmacological-only estimate was 1.04. Evidence for urine output, urinary sodium, and ultrasound was also inconsistent.

Conclusions: Short-term weight loss showed a directional but non-robust trial-level association with clinical benefit. The randomized trial-level evidence evaluated here is insufficient to validate short-term weight change as a surrogate for post-discharge clinical outcomes in AHF.

Related

  1. Renal Dysfunction and Cardiorenal Syndrome in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Residual Congestion and Decongestion Response
    Abdul Hannan, Abul Kashem Himon, Sarah Singh +7
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Pulmonary thromboembolism with prolonged pulmonary infarction during intensive decongestion for severe heart failure : A case report
    A-Reum Roh, Jong Hyun Baek, Jong-Il Park
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Subcutaneous Furosemide for Ambulatory Decongestion in Heart Failure: Outcomes From a High-Risk Real-World Cohort.
    Omar Jafar, Ann Harper, Angela Toepp +1
    Clinical cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Weight loss and blood pressure lowering with GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-hormone receptor modulators in overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-regression of phase 3 clinical trials
    Massimo Nardone, Luxcia Kugathasan, Lauren Daunt +7
    eClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Adjunctive pirenoxine is associated with transient tear biomarker changes without sustained ocular surface benefit after refractive surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Phit Upaphong, Nattayaporn Apaijai, Napaporn Tananuvat +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wang2026shortterm,
  title = {{Short-term decongestion and clinical benefit in acute heart failure: a systematic review and trial-level meta-regression}},
  author = {Huiming Wang and Hang Fang and Mengqi Wu and Qiang Chen and Anyi Fu and Mengdan Xu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942130},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942130/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Short-term decongestion and clinical benefit in acute heart failure: a systematic review and trial-level meta-regression
AU  - Huiming Wang
AU  - Hang Fang
AU  - Mengqi Wu
AU  - Qiang Chen
AU  - Anyi Fu
AU  - Mengdan Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942130
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942130/full
AB  - Background: Body weight, urine output, urinary sodium, and ultrasound findings are frequently used as early trial endpoints in acute heart failure (AHF). However, patient-level prognostic associations with residual congestion do not establish the fact that treatment-induced marker improvement predicts fewer deaths or heart failure events.  Objectives: The objectives of this work are to pair short-term decongestion and subsequent clinical treatment effects within the same randomized comparisons, explore the trial-level association for body weight, and qualitatively assess non-weight markers.  Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, OpenAlex, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched through 18 July 2026. Eligible randomized adult AHF trials reported an objective decongestion effect and ≥30-day mortality, heart failure events, or rehospitalization. The amended primary marker was weight change at 24–96 h (original window, 48–96 h); clinical effects were log hazard or risk ratios. An errors-in-variables meta-regression model used 10,000 trial cluster bootstrap fits and trial-level jackknife intervals.  Results: Twenty-four trials (27 reports) were accepted for qualitative synthesis; the primary analysis included 12 comparisons from only 10 independent trials. Endpoints, follow-up (30–302 days), effect measures, and mechanisms were heterogeneous. Each additional 1-kg between-group difference in weight loss corresponded to a clinical effect ratio of 0.74 (percentile 95% interval, 0.56–1.26; jackknife, 0.49–1.11). The pharmacological-only estimate was 1.04. Evidence for urine output, urinary sodium, and ultrasound was also inconsistent.  Conclusions: Short-term weight loss showed a directional but non-robust trial-level association with clinical benefit. The randomized trial-level evidence evaluated here is insufficient to validate short-term weight change as a surrogate for post-discharge clinical outcomes in AHF.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -