Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Endocrinology

Glycemic dysregulation and insulin resistance across acute and post-acute COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of etiologic and prognostic evidence

6 affiliations
  1. 1Laboratorio de Inmunología, Centro Universitario de los Lagos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco
  2. 2Centro de Investigación e Innovación, Global University, Aguascalientes
  3. 3Facultad de Medicina, Unidad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz
  4. 4Ingenieria Bioquímica, Centro Universitario de los Lagos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco
  5. 5Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y de la Vida, Centro Universitario de Los Lagos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco
  6. 6Programa de Estancias Posdoctorales por Mexico, Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación, Centro Universitario de Los Lagos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can disrupt glucose regulation through inflammation, adipose-tissue dysfunction, impaired insulin signaling, and variable β-cell compensation. These evidence domains remain incompletely integrated.

Objective: To synthesize evidence on glycemic dysregulation and insulin resistance or insulin sensitivity across acute and post-acute COVID-19, including metabolic trajectories and associations with adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched. Eligible studies evaluated glucose regulation and at least one insulin-resistance or insulin-sensitivity measure during or after COVID-19. Etiological and prognostic evidence was analyzed as related but distinct domains. Prognostic meta-analysis evaluated study-defined acute hyperglycemic phenotypes; insulin-resistance or insulin-sensitivity assessment was a study-level eligibility criterion rather than part of a participant-level composite exposure. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) from event counts were pooled using restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects models with Hartung–Knapp adjustment. Non-combinable evidence was synthesized according to Synthesis Without Meta-analysis principles. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools, and certainty was evaluated with GRADE. The protocol and analytical plan were retrospectively registered in OSF on August 21, 2026 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU ).

Results: Twenty independent studies represented by 23 reports. Acute hyperglycemic phenotypes were associated with increased short-term all-cause mortality (four studies; 1,079 participants; RR 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–3.64; I ² =31.3%; 95% prediction interval 0.96–4.56) and invasive mechanical ventilation (three studies; 679 participants; RR 3.64, 95% CI 1.74–7.61; I ² =0%). Mortality estimates remained directionally stable in sensitivity analysis. Adding a large study using peak in-hospital glucose preserved the mortality association but produced substantial heterogeneity for ventilation. Etiological evidence showed no uniform post-COVID trajectory: insulin resistance or glycemic abnormalities resolved in some populations, persisted in others, and progressed toward newly diagnosed diabetes in a subset. Mechanistic evidence implicated inflammatory stress, adipose-tissue dysfunction, impaired insulin signaling, and variable β-cell responses.

Conclusions: Study-defined acute hyperglycemic phenotypes were associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in studies that also assessed insulin resistance or insulin sensitivity. These unadjusted estimates should not be interpreted as effects of a combined phenotype or as causal associations. Persistent metabolic abnormalities occurred heterogeneously, supporting standardized participant-level definitions and controlled longitudinal studies.

Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU , identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU.

Related

  1. Feedforward–feedback mismatch as a biocybernetic hypothesis for postprandial glycemic dysregulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Yu Wan
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Endocrinology & metabolismCrossref
  2. Benzene exposure in relation to the development of glycemic dysregulation and type 2 diabetes mediated by oxidative stress and aggravated by inflammation in a repeated-measure prospective cohort study of Chinese adults
    Le Hong, Shuhui Wan, Wendi Shi +13
    Redox BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyDOAJPMC
  3. FOXM1 Drives Subtype-Specific Dysregulation of Prognostic miRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells
    Zuhal Hamurcu, Venhar Cınar, Ayse Doga Karipcin +6
    Journal of clinical practice and researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Acute glycemic responses to meal-associated alcoholic beverages and ethanol in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
    Jiahao Li, Huizhi Yang
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  5. The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep and glycemic outcomes in people with diabetes : A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuxiao Jiao, Xiaofei He, Lulu Ma +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{munozcarrillo2026glycemic,
  title = {{Glycemic dysregulation and insulin resistance across acute and post-acute COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of etiologic and prognostic evidence}},
  author = {José Luis Muñoz-Carrillo and Oscar Gutiérrez-Coronado and Edrei Lopez-Hernandez and Sandra Estefanía Rodríguez López and Miriam Alejandra Olivares Mendoza and Diego Octavio Ramírez Águila and Paola Trinidad Villalobos-Gutiérrez and Cesar Soria-Fregozo and Gilberto Uriel Rosas-Sánchez and Alejandro David Soriano-Hernández},
  journal = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1975728},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1975728/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Glycemic dysregulation and insulin resistance across acute and post-acute COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of etiologic and prognostic evidence
AU  - José Luis Muñoz-Carrillo
AU  - Oscar Gutiérrez-Coronado
AU  - Edrei Lopez-Hernandez
AU  - Sandra Estefanía Rodríguez López
AU  - Miriam Alejandra Olivares Mendoza
AU  - Diego Octavio Ramírez Águila
AU  - Paola Trinidad Villalobos-Gutiérrez
AU  - Cesar Soria-Fregozo
AU  - Gilberto Uriel Rosas-Sánchez
AU  - Alejandro David Soriano-Hernández
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Frontiers in Endocrinology
DO  - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1975728
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1975728/full
AB  - Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can disrupt glucose regulation through inflammation, adipose-tissue dysfunction, impaired insulin signaling, and variable β-cell compensation. These evidence domains remain incompletely integrated.  Objective: To synthesize evidence on glycemic dysregulation and insulin resistance or insulin sensitivity across acute and post-acute COVID-19, including metabolic trajectories and associations with adverse clinical outcomes.  Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched. Eligible studies evaluated glucose regulation and at least one insulin-resistance or insulin-sensitivity measure during or after COVID-19. Etiological and prognostic evidence was analyzed as related but distinct domains. Prognostic meta-analysis evaluated study-defined acute hyperglycemic phenotypes; insulin-resistance or insulin-sensitivity assessment was a study-level eligibility criterion rather than part of a participant-level composite exposure. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) from event counts were pooled using restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects models with Hartung–Knapp adjustment. Non-combinable evidence was synthesized according to Synthesis Without Meta-analysis principles. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools, and certainty was evaluated with GRADE. The protocol and analytical plan were retrospectively registered in OSF on August 21, 2026 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU ).  Results: Twenty independent studies represented by 23 reports. Acute hyperglycemic phenotypes were associated with increased short-term all-cause mortality (four studies; 1,079 participants; RR 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–3.64; I ² =31.3%; 95% prediction interval 0.96–4.56) and invasive mechanical ventilation (three studies; 679 participants; RR 3.64, 95% CI 1.74–7.61; I ² =0%). Mortality estimates remained directionally stable in sensitivity analysis. Adding a large study using peak in-hospital glucose preserved the mortality association but produced substantial heterogeneity for ventilation. Etiological evidence showed no uniform post-COVID trajectory: insulin resistance or glycemic abnormalities resolved in some populations, persisted in others, and progressed toward newly diagnosed diabetes in a subset. Mechanistic evidence implicated inflammatory stress, adipose-tissue dysfunction, impaired insulin signaling, and variable β-cell responses.  Conclusions: Study-defined acute hyperglycemic phenotypes were associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in studies that also assessed insulin resistance or insulin sensitivity. These unadjusted estimates should not be interpreted as effects of a combined phenotype or as causal associations. Persistent metabolic abnormalities occurred heterogeneously, supporting standardized participant-level definitions and controlled longitudinal studies.  Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU , identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/K5FWU.
SN  - 1664-2392
ER  -