Financial navigation in gynecologic oncology: a qualitative study
- 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- 2Mixed Methods Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
- 3Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
Abstract
Introduction: Gynecologic oncology patients experience financial toxicity. Financial navigation, a program where individuals meet with a trained financial counselor to discuss estimated out-of-pocket costs, connect to assistance programs, and develop payment plans, may help reduce financial toxicity. Our objective was to examine the experiences of gynecologic oncology patients who received financial navigation services through qualitative data collection from patients and financial navigators. Methods: Since May 2022, we have offered financial navigation to patients seen in gynecologic oncology practices at a large academic health system. Financial navigators completed questionnaires to characterize services provided to patients, and we reported descriptive statistics of those served. We then recruited patients who participated for semi-structured interviews. Two team members used a thematic approach to code and identify themes. Results: In the first year, 31 patients were referred for financial navigation, and 28 received services. After review of insurance benefits by financial navigators, half had no estimated out-of-pocket costs for cancer care. Of patients with non-zero out-of-pocket, 42% of patients were referred for co-pay assistance of whom 40% ultimately received financial assistance grants. Patients reported transportation, rent, and food as major concerns, alongside medical costs. Patients appreciated the financial navigators' compassion and assistance navigating bureaucracy. Patients identified delayed insurance billing, high treatment-related out-of-pocket, external grants not meeting needs, and treatment-related fatigue as contributing to financial distress. Conclusion: Financial navigation was positively perceived by patients. Half of patients referred had low to no out-of-pocket costs after meeting with financial navigators, although patients identified significant non-medical financial stresses. Receipt of financial assistance was low among patients with high out-of-pocket, and patients identified gaps in coverage. Financial navigation addressed patients' medical costs, yet further work is needed to help patients survive broader financial toxicity of cancer treatment.
Related
- Perioperative inflammation in gynecologic oncology: nursing strategies for enhanced recovery and complication prevention
- Community-Based Cardio-Oncology Model for Hypertension Management in Gynecologic Oncology Patients on VEGF Inhibitors
- From image biomarkers to treatment decisions: multimodal AI and clinical translation in gynecologic oncology
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: 2026 update
- Psychometric properties and longitudinal measurement invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale in the Chinese colorectal cancer chemotherapy population.
BibTeX
@article{smith2026financial,
title = {{Financial navigation in gynecologic oncology: a qualitative study}},
author = {Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith and Daniel Carrera Mora and Caroline O'Brien and Lee Ang and Justin Greisz and Meredith Doherty and Emily M. Ko},
journal = {Gynecologic Oncology Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.gore.2026.102243},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102243},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Financial navigation in gynecologic oncology: a qualitative study
AU - Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
AU - Daniel Carrera Mora
AU - Caroline O'Brien
AU - Lee Ang
AU - Justin Greisz
AU - Meredith Doherty
AU - Emily M. Ko
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
DO - 10.1016/j.gore.2026.102243
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102243
AB - Introduction: Gynecologic oncology patients experience financial toxicity. Financial navigation, a program where individuals meet with a trained financial counselor to discuss estimated out-of-pocket costs, connect to assistance programs, and develop payment plans, may help reduce financial toxicity. Our objective was to examine the experiences of gynecologic oncology patients who received financial navigation services through qualitative data collection from patients and financial navigators. Methods: Since May 2022, we have offered financial navigation to patients seen in gynecologic oncology practices at a large academic health system. Financial navigators completed questionnaires to characterize services provided to patients, and we reported descriptive statistics of those served. We then recruited patients who participated for semi-structured interviews. Two team members used a thematic approach to code and identify themes. Results: In the first year, 31 patients were referred for financial navigation, and 28 received services. After review of insurance benefits by financial navigators, half had no estimated out-of-pocket costs for cancer care. Of patients with non-zero out-of-pocket, 42% of patients were referred for co-pay assistance of whom 40% ultimately received financial assistance grants. Patients reported transportation, rent, and food as major concerns, alongside medical costs. Patients appreciated the financial navigators' compassion and assistance navigating bureaucracy. Patients identified delayed insurance billing, high treatment-related out-of-pocket, external grants not meeting needs, and treatment-related fatigue as contributing to financial distress. Conclusion: Financial navigation was positively perceived by patients. Half of patients referred had low to no out-of-pocket costs after meeting with financial navigators, although patients identified significant non-medical financial stresses. Receipt of financial assistance was low among patients with high out-of-pocket, and patients identified gaps in coverage. Financial navigation addressed patients' medical costs, yet further work is needed to help patients survive broader financial toxicity of cancer treatment.
SN - 2352-5789
ER -