Refining absolute GFR estimation in children: development and validation of the GROW-GFR equation
12 affiliations
- 1Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne
- 2Antimicrobials Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
- 3Certara
- 4School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne
- 5Kidney Regeneration, Murdoch Research Institute
- 6Department of Paediatric Nephrology, The Royal Children’s Hospital
- 7Department of Medical Imaging, The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne
- 8Department of Pharmacy, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead
- 9Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney
- 10Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The Royal Children’s Hospital
- 11Respiratory Diseases Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
- 12Department of General Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children’s Hospital
Abstract
Background: Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential when dosing many medications. Existing paediatric GFR equations vary in accuracy, with only one (Modified Schwartz) validated in children <2 years. This study developed a new paediatric GFR equation (GROW-GFR) using a tobramycin population pharmacokinetic model and evaluated its performance against current equations and nuclear medicine (NM)-GFR scans.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of NM-GFR scans from July 2016-November 2023 in children aged 0–19 years at The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. Results were included if NM-GFR was ≤150 mL/min and height, weight and serum creatinine were recorded. Accuracy of GFR estimates within 30% and 10% of NM-GFR results (p30, p10 accuracy) and bias for the GROW-GFR, Modified Schwartz, Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Under 25 years (CKiD-U25), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), and FAS-height (HT) equations were assessed.
Results: Overall, 1560 NM-GFR results from 711 children (median age 8.5 years; range 0.1–19) were included (median NM-GFR 55 mL/min; range 0.5–150). GROW-GFR showed a p30 accuracy of 76% and bias of −1.9 mL/min, with consistent performance across all ages. The Modified Schwartz equation had a p30 accuracy of 46% and bias of 17.3 mL/min. In children ≥2 years, GROW-GFR outperformed other equations (p30: 76% vs. 49%–58%; bias −1.9 vs. 13.7–18.4 mL/min). After applying linear mixed-effects models, GROW-GFR p30 accuracy and bias were 80% and −2.5 mL/min, outperforming other equations (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The GROW-GFR equation provided more accurate GFR estimates across all paediatric ages, including children <2 years, compared to existing equations. Therefore, should be considered the preferred GFR estimation method.
Related
- Refining E-detectioN Tools for Emerging mental disoRders (ENTER) to identify young people at clinical high risk for psychosis in the community: model development and internal validation
- Development and External Validation of Machine Learning Models for Ionized Calcium Estimation in Hypoalbuminemia
- Development and validation of a nomogram for stratifying severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia risk in children early
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting flexible bronchoscopy utilization in children with lobar pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a single-center retrospective cohort study
- Development and validation of an interpretable prediction model for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children with urinary tract infections
BibTeX
@article{harwood2026refining,
title = {{Refining absolute GFR estimation in children: development and validation of the GROW-GFR equation}},
author = {Kiera H. Harwood and Stephen Duffull and Christian Davey and Catherine Quinlan and Thomas Forbes and Peter Francis and Tony Lai and Sarath Ranganathan and Amanda Gwee},
journal = {Frontiers in Pharmacology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fphar.2026.1855031},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2026.1855031/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Refining absolute GFR estimation in children: development and validation of the GROW-GFR equation
AU - Kiera H. Harwood
AU - Stephen Duffull
AU - Christian Davey
AU - Catherine Quinlan
AU - Thomas Forbes
AU - Peter Francis
AU - Tony Lai
AU - Sarath Ranganathan
AU - Amanda Gwee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - Frontiers in Pharmacology
DO - 10.3389/fphar.2026.1855031
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2026.1855031/full
AB - Background: Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential when dosing many medications. Existing paediatric GFR equations vary in accuracy, with only one (Modified Schwartz) validated in children <2 years. This study developed a new paediatric GFR equation (GROW-GFR) using a tobramycin population pharmacokinetic model and evaluated its performance against current equations and nuclear medicine (NM)-GFR scans. Methods: Retrospective analysis of NM-GFR scans from July 2016-November 2023 in children aged 0–19 years at The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. Results were included if NM-GFR was ≤150 mL/min and height, weight and serum creatinine were recorded. Accuracy of GFR estimates within 30% and 10% of NM-GFR results (p30, p10 accuracy) and bias for the GROW-GFR, Modified Schwartz, Chronic Kidney Disease in Children Under 25 years (CKiD-U25), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), and FAS-height (HT) equations were assessed. Results: Overall, 1560 NM-GFR results from 711 children (median age 8.5 years; range 0.1–19) were included (median NM-GFR 55 mL/min; range 0.5–150). GROW-GFR showed a p30 accuracy of 76% and bias of −1.9 mL/min, with consistent performance across all ages. The Modified Schwartz equation had a p30 accuracy of 46% and bias of 17.3 mL/min. In children ≥2 years, GROW-GFR outperformed other equations (p30: 76% vs. 49%–58%; bias −1.9 vs. 13.7–18.4 mL/min). After applying linear mixed-effects models, GROW-GFR p30 accuracy and bias were 80% and −2.5 mL/min, outperforming other equations (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The GROW-GFR equation provided more accurate GFR estimates across all paediatric ages, including children <2 years, compared to existing equations. Therefore, should be considered the preferred GFR estimation method.
SN - 1663-9812
ER -