Greater scaling and less flexible timing of cortical responses during challenging reactive balance after stroke
- 1University of Minnesota
Abstract
BackgroundCortical N1 responses to balance perturbations are larger and earlier with increasing magnitude and differ with reactive stepping. Whether stroke alters this modulation is unknown.
ObjectiveTo compare N1 modulation across perturbation magnitudes and reactive balance outcomes in older adults with and without stroke. We hypothesized that people with stroke would show greater N1 scaling than controls; that larger N1s at small perturbations would limit scaling (a recruitment ceiling); and that stroke would constrain N1 modulation by stepping outcome.
MethodsSixteen people with chronic stroke (66{+/-}11 years) and 15 age-similar controls (68{+/-}8 years) received forward support-surface perturbations at a small standardized magnitude and at individual step thresholds ([~]50% unintentional steps). N1 peak amplitude and latency were compared across magnitudes in feet-in-place trials, and between stepping and feet-in-place trials at step threshold. N1 scaling was the relative amplitude increase between magnitudes.
ResultsDespite lower clinical balance after stroke (p<0.001), step thresholds were similar between groups. N1s were larger with shorter latencies at step threshold in both groups (p<0.001), but scaled more after stroke (44% vs 13%,p=0.009). Greater scaling was associated with smaller small-magnitude N1s after stroke ({beta}=-0.43, p=0.041) and higher step thresholds across groups ({beta}=0.35, p=0.048). N1 latency was 11 ms longer in stepping trials in controls but not after stroke (interaction p=0.024).
ConclusionsScaling of cortical recruitment with increasing perturbation magnitude may support reactive balance, and may be an adaptive mechanism for people after stroke. Less flexible N1 timing after stroke may limit cortical tuning to balance recovery strategy.
Related
- Enhancing integration for greater sustainability of HIV, TB and malaria responses: insights and lessons from African community-led monitoring programs
- VSV-EBOV vaccination induces cross-reactive T-cell responses against Bundibugyo virus in humans
- Conserved nucleocapsid epitopes induce cross-reactive CD4⁺ T-cell responses with selective protection against human coronaviruses in mice.
- Cross-Reactive Bundibugyo Antibody Responses after Receipt of Licensed Ebola Vaccines
- Serologic Testing for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2 Cross-Reactive Immune Responses, the Netherlands
BibTeX
@misc{palmer2026greater,
title = {{Greater scaling and less flexible timing of cortical responses during challenging reactive balance after stroke}},
author = {J. A. Palmer and L. H. Ting and M. R. Borich and A. Payne and J. Mirdamadi},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.21.26366125},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.26366125v1},
note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Greater scaling and less flexible timing of cortical responses during challenging reactive balance after stroke
AU - J. A. Palmer
AU - L. H. Ting
AU - M. R. Borich
AU - A. Payne
AU - J. Mirdamadi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.21.26366125
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.21.26366125v1
AB - BackgroundCortical N1 responses to balance perturbations are larger and earlier with increasing magnitude and differ with reactive stepping. Whether stroke alters this modulation is unknown. ObjectiveTo compare N1 modulation across perturbation magnitudes and reactive balance outcomes in older adults with and without stroke. We hypothesized that people with stroke would show greater N1 scaling than controls; that larger N1s at small perturbations would limit scaling (a recruitment ceiling); and that stroke would constrain N1 modulation by stepping outcome. MethodsSixteen people with chronic stroke (66{+/-}11 years) and 15 age-similar controls (68{+/-}8 years) received forward support-surface perturbations at a small standardized magnitude and at individual step thresholds ([~]50% unintentional steps). N1 peak amplitude and latency were compared across magnitudes in feet-in-place trials, and between stepping and feet-in-place trials at step threshold. N1 scaling was the relative amplitude increase between magnitudes. ResultsDespite lower clinical balance after stroke (p<0.001), step thresholds were similar between groups. N1s were larger with shorter latencies at step threshold in both groups (p<0.001), but scaled more after stroke (44% vs 13%,p=0.009). Greater scaling was associated with smaller small-magnitude N1s after stroke ({beta}=-0.43, p=0.041) and higher step thresholds across groups ({beta}=0.35, p=0.048). N1 latency was 11 ms longer in stepping trials in controls but not after stroke (interaction p=0.024). ConclusionsScaling of cortical recruitment with increasing perturbation magnitude may support reactive balance, and may be an adaptive mechanism for people after stroke. Less flexible N1 timing after stroke may limit cortical tuning to balance recovery strategy.
ER -