Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in Genetics

Dynamic mutator states in cancer

  1. 1ndependent Researcher, Palo Alto, CA, United States

Abstract

Somatic mutation generation is fundamental to cancer initiation, progression, heterogeneity, and treatment resistance, yet mutagenic capacity is often interpreted primarily through constitutive defects in DNA replication and genome-maintenance pathways. Emerging evidence indicates that the probability, rate, and spectrum of newly acquired mutations can also vary with cellular physiology and environmental context. This Review examines metabolic and mitochondrial alterations, oncogenic replication stress, transcriptional and chromatin-associated processes, inflammatory and enzymatic mutagenesis, tumor-microenvironmental pressures, and therapy-associated adaptation as potential determinants of mutation generation. We distinguish mutation generation from DNA damage, genomic instability, accumulated mutation burden, mutational topography, and clonal selection, and evaluate these mechanisms according to the strength of evidence linking cellular or environmental perturbations to subsequent mutation acquisition. Building on classical mutator phenotypes and prior concepts of stress-induced, adaptive, and therapy-associated mutagenesis, we propose the framework of dynamic mutator states: coordinated cellular configurations in which mutagenic capacity differs from an appropriate reference state through mechanistically identifiable processes and is accompanied by altered acquisition, rate, or spectrum of new mutations. Such states may be transient, recurrent, persistent, or progressively stabilized during tumor initiation, spatial diversification, metastatic evolution, treatment adaptation, residual disease, and relapse. We further define experimental criteria for identifying dynamic mutator states, emphasizing prospective mutation measurement, temporal ordering, lineage resolution, perturbation, and reversal or rescue. Finally, we consider whether mutation-generating processes themselves could become therapeutic targets, thereby limiting the supply of new genetic variation available for subsequent selection. A state-based view of mutagenesis provides a framework for connecting cellular physiology to mutation acquisition and for determining when mutation supply becomes a dynamic and potentially actionable component of cancer evolution.

Related

  1. Dose- and time-resolved immune states in cervical cancer radiotherapy: dynamic multimodal biomarkers for adaptive immunoradiotherapy
    Chengjian Xiao, Feilong Tian, Minli Kang +1
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
  2. Remnant Lipoproteins as Dynamic Metabolic States: A Residence Time–Based Framework for TRL Metabolism
    Katsuyuki Nakajima, Masami Murakami, Akira Tanaka
    Journal of Lipid ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  3. Bilateral M1 tDCS selectively modulates dynamic large-scale brain states associated with sensorimotor control relative to sham stimulation
    Haya Salameh, Toni Muffel, Yvonne Serhan +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  4. MBB-AVR: a mind-brain-body dataset with dynamic affective states in immersive virtual reality
    Antonin Fourcade, Anthony Ciston, Lucy Roellecke +6
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyOSF
  5. Dynamic Risk Stratification for Short-Term Deterioration After Acute Stroke: Incremental Value of Radiology-Report-Derived Neuroimaging Phenotypes Beyond Dynamic ICU States, a retrospective cohort study with temporal validation
    P. LEI, Y. XU, Y. ZHANG +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{naffaa2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic mutator states in cancer}},
  author = {Moawiah M. Naffaa},
  journal = {Frontiers in Genetics},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fgene.2026.2007761},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.2007761},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic mutator states in cancer
AU  - Moawiah M. Naffaa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - Frontiers in Genetics
DO  - 10.3389/fgene.2026.2007761
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.2007761
AB  - Somatic mutation generation is fundamental to cancer initiation, progression, heterogeneity, and treatment resistance, yet mutagenic capacity is often interpreted primarily through constitutive defects in DNA replication and genome-maintenance pathways. Emerging evidence indicates that the probability, rate, and spectrum of newly acquired mutations can also vary with cellular physiology and environmental context. This Review examines metabolic and mitochondrial alterations, oncogenic replication stress, transcriptional and chromatin-associated processes, inflammatory and enzymatic mutagenesis, tumor-microenvironmental pressures, and therapy-associated adaptation as potential determinants of mutation generation. We distinguish mutation generation from DNA damage, genomic instability, accumulated mutation burden, mutational topography, and clonal selection, and evaluate these mechanisms according to the strength of evidence linking cellular or environmental perturbations to subsequent mutation acquisition. Building on classical mutator phenotypes and prior concepts of stress-induced, adaptive, and therapy-associated mutagenesis, we propose the framework of dynamic mutator states: coordinated cellular configurations in which mutagenic capacity differs from an appropriate reference state through mechanistically identifiable processes and is accompanied by altered acquisition, rate, or spectrum of new mutations. Such states may be transient, recurrent, persistent, or progressively stabilized during tumor initiation, spatial diversification, metastatic evolution, treatment adaptation, residual disease, and relapse. We further define experimental criteria for identifying dynamic mutator states, emphasizing prospective mutation measurement, temporal ordering, lineage resolution, perturbation, and reversal or rescue. Finally, we consider whether mutation-generating processes themselves could become therapeutic targets, thereby limiting the supply of new genetic variation available for subsequent selection. A state-based view of mutagenesis provides a framework for connecting cellular physiology to mutation acquisition and for determining when mutation supply becomes a dynamic and potentially actionable component of cancer evolution.
SN  - 1664-8021
ER  -