Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in public health

Environmental cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality: biological mechanisms, regional heterogeneity, and public health implications

  1. 1College of Sports Training, Jilin Sport University , , ,
  2. 2College of Physical Education, Northeast Electric Power University , , ,

Abstract

Background: Ambient cold exposure has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality worldwide, but effects vary across climatic and socioeconomic settings. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological evidence on geographic variation in cold-related cardiovascular mortality and considers environmental, biological, and societal factors that may contribute to the observed patterns.

Methods: We conducted a narrative review of epidemiological studies investigating associations between ambient cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality. Climatic setting and socioeconomic context were considered as separate analytical dimensions, using local temperature distributions, seasonal patterns, study-specific cold definitions, income classification, housing and heating conditions, healthcare accessibility, and other contextual characteristics where relevant. Because study designs, exposure definitions, lag structures, outcomes, and effect measures were heterogeneous, the synthesis was qualitative; no formal quantitative pooling, causal attribution, or direct ranking of regional vulnerability was undertaken.

Results: Evidence suggests that cold-related cardiovascular mortality varies across climatic and socioeconomic settings. Among 26 epidemiological studies contributing to the regional synthesis, substantial heterogeneity was observed in study design, population coverage, temperature metrics, cold definitions, lag structures, covariate adjustment, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures. Methodological credibility was considered qualitatively rather than through a formal risk-of-bias score, with greater interpretive weight given to large multi-location, nationwide, or within-country studies applying standardized or internally consistent analytical frameworks. Illustrative reported estimates included approximately 6.3% of cardiovascular deaths attributable to temperatures below the county-specific minimum mortality temperature in a US analysis, 11.4% (95% CI 6.0–15.4%; lag 0–14 days) attributable to temperatures below the city-specific optimum temperature in a seven-city Norwegian analysis, and a cold-wave-related cardiovascular mortality RR of 1.076 (95% CI 1.061–1.090; lag 0–3 days) in a nationwide Thai study. Because exposure definitions, lag structures, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures differed substantially among studies, no consistent quantitative gradient in vulnerability by climatic setting, latitude, or socioeconomic context could be established. The qualitative evidence suggests that regional patterns may reflect a combination of climatic conditions, biological susceptibility, behavioral responses, socioeconomic circumstances, housing and heating conditions, healthcare capacity, population-level adaptive capacity, and methodological differences. Their relative contributions cannot be determined from the available evidence, and evidence from many warm-climate and lower-resource settings remains limited.

Related

  1. Exerkines in Cardiovascular–Kidney–Metabolic Syndrome: An Integrative Framework for Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications—A Narrative Review
    Hongyan Fan, Changlin Zhai, Chaojie He +3
    Reviews in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Tumor heterogeneity: development, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications
    Jianhong Zhang, Heng Li, Shuo Ru +6
    Signal Transduction and Targeted TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text10 citedOncologyOpenAlex
  3. The role of patient age in fertility preservation among women with breast cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical implications
    Martina Placidi, Manuela Ludovisi, Laura Pizzorno +3
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  4. Radon balneotherapy in rheumatologic diseases: potential mechanisms and implications for cardiovascular autonomic control and inflammation
    Gabriel D Rodrigues, Earric Lee, Benoit Dugué +11
    Clinical RheumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeneral biologyPhysiologyHAL
  5. Socioeconomic inequalities in biological age: multidimensional gradients and cross-national heterogeneity in SHARE
    H. Guo
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{xiao2026environmental,
  title = {{Environmental cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality: biological mechanisms, regional heterogeneity, and public health implications}},
  author = {Ling-Jie Xiao and Xin-Yu Ma and Ji-Zu Shi},
  journal = {Frontiers in public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1961371},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662766},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Environmental cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality: biological mechanisms, regional heterogeneity, and public health implications
AU  - Ling-Jie Xiao
AU  - Xin-Yu Ma
AU  - Ji-Zu Shi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in public health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1961371
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13662766
AB  - Background: Ambient cold exposure has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality worldwide, but effects vary across climatic and socioeconomic settings. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological evidence on geographic variation in cold-related cardiovascular mortality and considers environmental, biological, and societal factors that may contribute to the observed patterns.  Methods: We conducted a narrative review of epidemiological studies investigating associations between ambient cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality. Climatic setting and socioeconomic context were considered as separate analytical dimensions, using local temperature distributions, seasonal patterns, study-specific cold definitions, income classification, housing and heating conditions, healthcare accessibility, and other contextual characteristics where relevant. Because study designs, exposure definitions, lag structures, outcomes, and effect measures were heterogeneous, the synthesis was qualitative; no formal quantitative pooling, causal attribution, or direct ranking of regional vulnerability was undertaken.  Results: Evidence suggests that cold-related cardiovascular mortality varies across climatic and socioeconomic settings. Among 26 epidemiological studies contributing to the regional synthesis, substantial heterogeneity was observed in study design, population coverage, temperature metrics, cold definitions, lag structures, covariate adjustment, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures. Methodological credibility was considered qualitatively rather than through a formal risk-of-bias score, with greater interpretive weight given to large multi-location, nationwide, or within-country studies applying standardized or internally consistent analytical frameworks. Illustrative reported estimates included approximately 6.3% of cardiovascular deaths attributable to temperatures below the county-specific minimum mortality temperature in a US analysis, 11.4% (95% CI 6.0–15.4%; lag 0–14 days) attributable to temperatures below the city-specific optimum temperature in a seven-city Norwegian analysis, and a cold-wave-related cardiovascular mortality RR of 1.076 (95% CI 1.061–1.090; lag 0–3 days) in a nationwide Thai study. Because exposure definitions, lag structures, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures differed substantially among studies, no consistent quantitative gradient in vulnerability by climatic setting, latitude, or socioeconomic context could be established. The qualitative evidence suggests that regional patterns may reflect a combination of climatic conditions, biological susceptibility, behavioral responses, socioeconomic circumstances, housing and heating conditions, healthcare capacity, population-level adaptive capacity, and methodological differences. Their relative contributions cannot be determined from the available evidence, and evidence from many warm-climate and lower-resource settings remains limited.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -