Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in medicine

Efficacy comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes from a propensity score-matched analysis

  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Gaozhou People’s Hospital, Guangdong Medical University , ,
  2. 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital , ,

Abstract

Introduction: This study consecutively enrolled patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Gaozhou People's Hospital between January 1, 2,019, and January 1, 2022.

Methods: All patients received neoadjuvant therapy followed by minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and were categorized according to treatment modality: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), or chemoimmunotherapy (nICT). Propensity score matching yielded 78 patients per group. The primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence patterns.

Results: One-year RFS was significantly lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT and nICT groups (p = 0.020), whereas 2-year OS was significantly higher in the nICT group (p = 0.018). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year OS or RFS. Recurrence occurred significantly earlier in the nCT group than in the nICT group (p < 0.05), with no statistically significant differences in the other pairwise comparisons.

Discussion: In this retrospective matched-cohort study, nICT did not significantly improve 3-year OS or RFS compared with nCRT, although recurrence appeared to occur later in the nICT group. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, as potential long-term immunotherapy effects and radiotherapy-related modulation of long-term benefit could not be assessed. The lower survival observed in the nCT group suggests that chemotherapy alone may be insufficient for ESCC. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm long-term benefits and identify patients most likely to benefit from nICT.

Related

  1. InDuRanS: neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy and consolidation durvalumab in resectable and borderline resectable stage IIB-IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Eleni Gkika, Cornelius F Waller, Cas S Dejonckheere +11
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Explainable machine learning for predicting grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: predominant contribution of hematologic toxicity.
    Fei-Hang Zhi, Yunzeng Zhang, Tengfei Ge +14
    Translational lung cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Long-Term Outcomes of Anatomical and Biological Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Gemcitabine/S-1-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Haruna Komatsubara, Shugo Mizuno, Daisuke Noguchi +10
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  4. Locoregional and distant recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a focused meta-analysis.
    Yingding Ruan, Wenjun Cao, Chuan Long +2
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Induction Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Jiayue Liu, Wei Deng, Xin Dong +11
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes from a propensity score-matched analysis}},
  author = {Hai Zhang and Yujing Liang and Chaolin Li and Bomeng Wu and Jiangbo Lin and Wanli Lin},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1994701},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728853},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes from a propensity score-matched analysis
AU  - Hai Zhang
AU  - Yujing Liang
AU  - Chaolin Li
AU  - Bomeng Wu
AU  - Jiangbo Lin
AU  - Wanli Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1994701
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728853
AB  - Introduction: This study consecutively enrolled patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Gaozhou People's Hospital between January 1, 2,019, and January 1, 2022.  Methods: All patients received neoadjuvant therapy followed by minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and were categorized according to treatment modality: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), or chemoimmunotherapy (nICT). Propensity score matching yielded 78 patients per group. The primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence patterns.  Results: One-year RFS was significantly lower in the nCT group than in the nCRT and nICT groups (p = 0.020), whereas 2-year OS was significantly higher in the nICT group (p = 0.018). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year OS or RFS. Recurrence occurred significantly earlier in the nCT group than in the nICT group (p < 0.05), with no statistically significant differences in the other pairwise comparisons.  Discussion: In this retrospective matched-cohort study, nICT did not significantly improve 3-year OS or RFS compared with nCRT, although recurrence appeared to occur later in the nICT group. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, as potential long-term immunotherapy effects and radiotherapy-related modulation of long-term benefit could not be assessed. The lower survival observed in the nCT group suggests that chemotherapy alone may be insufficient for ESCC. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm long-term benefits and identify patients most likely to benefit from nICT.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -