Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Dynamic Spillovers in Higher Moments and Jumps Across Chinese New Energy and Industry Stock Markets

  1. 1Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  2. 2College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  3. 3School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Abstract

Equity-market connectedness can look different depending on whether risk is measured by variance, asymmetry, tail thickness, or jumps. Using 5 min observations for the CSI New Energy Index and ten Shanghai Stock Exchange sector indices from 4 January 2016 to 31 December 2025, we construct 2430 common daily observations of realized volatility, skewness, kurtosis, and jump risk and estimate four TVP-VAR/GFEVD systems. Average total connectedness is 81.2 for volatility, 52.1 for skewness, 41.2 for kurtosis, and 51.1 for jump risk. The new-energy index is a net transmitter in all four full-sample systems, with NET values of 4.7, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.6, respectively, but the dominant transmitter differs by risk dimension: industrials lead volatility and skewness, materials lead kurtosis, and consumer discretionary leads jump risk. Subperiod results show that these roles are not temporally invariant; ZNE becomes a net receiver in several post-2021 risk-measure/period combinations. Alternative lag lengths, forecast horizons, forgetting factors, 15 min aggregation, and an alternative jump-test size leave the broad TVP-VAR conclusions unchanged. The results show that sectoral risk leadership is both dimension-specific and time-varying, with implications for portfolio and sectoral risk monitoring.

Related

  1. Dynamic Return Spillovers and Heterogeneous Responses Across Energy Equity Markets Under Demand–Supply Risks: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Chinese News Texts
    Lei Wang, Junyi Zhu, Tingqiang Chen +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Mathematical Characterization of Dynamic Risk Spillovers in Carbon-Energy Financial Networks with Multi-Dimensional Uncertainty: A TVP-VAR-DY Connectedness Approach via Generalized Forecast-Error Variance Decomposition
    Wenxin Zhang, Rufei Zhang, Qian Zhu
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Dynamic factor and double PCA models for partially observed survival curves: Forecasting demand in short-term rental markets
    Marthe Elisabeth Aastveit, Alex Lenkoski, Thordis Thorarinsdottir
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Dynamic Multi-Pair Trading Strategy in Cryptocurrency Markets with Deep Reinforcement Learning
    Damian Lebiedź, Robert Ślepaczuk
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Multivariate Hawkes-Driven Dynamic Vine Copulas for Jump Clustering and Systemic Risk Measurement in Financial Markets
    Jingqi Yao, Xuechao Xia
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{xie2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Spillovers in Higher Moments and Jumps Across Chinese New Energy and Industry Stock Markets}},
  author = {Sai Xie and Cai Yang and Hongwei Zhang},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/math14193440},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/19/3440},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic Spillovers in Higher Moments and Jumps Across Chinese New Energy and Industry Stock Markets
AU  - Sai Xie
AU  - Cai Yang
AU  - Hongwei Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14193440
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/19/3440
AB  - Equity-market connectedness can look different depending on whether risk is measured by variance, asymmetry, tail thickness, or jumps. Using 5 min observations for the CSI New Energy Index and ten Shanghai Stock Exchange sector indices from 4 January 2016 to 31 December 2025, we construct 2430 common daily observations of realized volatility, skewness, kurtosis, and jump risk and estimate four TVP-VAR/GFEVD systems. Average total connectedness is 81.2 for volatility, 52.1 for skewness, 41.2 for kurtosis, and 51.1 for jump risk. The new-energy index is a net transmitter in all four full-sample systems, with NET values of 4.7, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.6, respectively, but the dominant transmitter differs by risk dimension: industrials lead volatility and skewness, materials lead kurtosis, and consumer discretionary leads jump risk. Subperiod results show that these roles are not temporally invariant; ZNE becomes a net receiver in several post-2021 risk-measure/period combinations. Alternative lag lengths, forecast horizons, forgetting factors, 15 min aggregation, and an alternative jump-test size leave the broad TVP-VAR conclusions unchanged. The results show that sectoral risk leadership is both dimension-specific and time-varying, with implications for portfolio and sectoral risk monitoring.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -