Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

Dynamic Return Spillovers and Heterogeneous Responses Across Energy Equity Markets Under Demand–Supply Risks: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Chinese News Texts

  1. 1School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

Abstract

This study adopts the TVP-VAR-DY framework to examine time-varying return spillovers within China’s energy sector equity market system. Based on textual data from major Chinese media, the Energy Demand–Supply Risk Index (EDRI) is constructed, and the GARCH-MIDAS model is applied to examine short- and long-term associations between energy demand–supply risks and dynamic return spillovers. Findings show: (1) Spillovers change over time and form a closely connected network, where new energy and electricity markets are main transmitters, while storage and traditional energy equity markets mainly receive. Storage is therefore better characterized as a systemically important buffer rather. (2) Effects differ across markets with lagged responses. Oil and natural gas react first, coal more slowly. (3) Each market’s position changes over time, while traditional fossil energy remains the primary source of fundamental demand–supply risks; new energy and electricity act as the dominant static net return transmitters in the equity market network, with traditional fuels surging into net transmitter roles specifically during crisis windows and pairwise transmission channels.

Related

  1. Dynamic Spillovers in Higher Moments and Jumps Across Chinese New Energy and Industry Stock Markets
    Sai Xie, Cai Yang, Hongwei Zhang
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Mathematical Characterization of Dynamic Risk Spillovers in Carbon-Energy Financial Networks with Multi-Dimensional Uncertainty: A TVP-VAR-DY Connectedness Approach via Generalized Forecast-Error Variance Decomposition
    Wenxin Zhang, Rufei Zhang, Qian Zhu
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Dynamic factor and double PCA models for partially observed survival curves: Forecasting demand in short-term rental markets
    Marthe Elisabeth Aastveit, Alex Lenkoski, Thordis Thorarinsdottir
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Dynamic Multi-Pair Trading Strategy in Cryptocurrency Markets with Deep Reinforcement Learning
    Damian Lebiedź, Robert Ślepaczuk
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Multivariate Hawkes-Driven Dynamic Vine Copulas for Jump Clustering and Systemic Risk Measurement in Financial Markets
    Jingqi Yao, Xuechao Xia
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wang2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Return Spillovers and Heterogeneous Responses Across Energy Equity Markets Under Demand–Supply Risks: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Chinese News Texts}},
  author = {Lei Wang and Junyi Zhu and Tingqiang Chen and Tao Xu},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14213934},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3934},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic Return Spillovers and Heterogeneous Responses Across Energy Equity Markets Under Demand–Supply Risks: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Chinese News Texts
AU  - Lei Wang
AU  - Junyi Zhu
AU  - Tingqiang Chen
AU  - Tao Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14213934
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/21/3934
AB  - This study adopts the TVP-VAR-DY framework to examine time-varying return spillovers within China’s energy sector equity market system. Based on textual data from major Chinese media, the Energy Demand–Supply Risk Index (EDRI) is constructed, and the GARCH-MIDAS model is applied to examine short- and long-term associations between energy demand–supply risks and dynamic return spillovers. Findings show: (1) Spillovers change over time and form a closely connected network, where new energy and electricity markets are main transmitters, while storage and traditional energy equity markets mainly receive. Storage is therefore better characterized as a systemically important buffer rather. (2) Effects differ across markets with lagged responses. Oil and natural gas react first, coal more slowly. (3) Each market’s position changes over time, while traditional fossil energy remains the primary source of fundamental demand–supply risks; new energy and electricity act as the dominant static net return transmitters in the equity market network, with traditional fuels surging into net transmitter roles specifically during crisis windows and pairwise transmission channels.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -