Efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Wastewater from Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling
Abstract
A treatment process was developed for effluents from direct physical lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling with a focus on the removal of organic contaminants. The high chemical oxygen demand to biological oxygen demand ratio (COD/BOD5) of 3.9–4.6 indicates that biological treatment is not feasible. Therefore, three advanced oxidation processes were evaluated: UV/H2O2 oxidation, the Fenton process and electrochemical oxidation. Two target scenarios were considered, namely compliance with the limit for discharge into the sewer system (COD = 800 mg/L) and compliance with the stricter limit for direct discharge into surface waters (COD = 200 mg/L). Under the investigated conditions, UV/H2O2 oxidation and the Fenton process did not meet the required discharge limits and exhibited high chemical consumption. In contrast, electrochemical oxidation achieved both discharge criteria with a lower energy demand, requiring 32.8 kWh/kgCODremoved for sewer discharge and 95.3 kWh/kgCODremoved for direct discharge. An economic assessment further identified electrochemical oxidation as the most cost-effective option, with treatment costs of EUR 6.63/m3, compared to EUR 17.31/m3 for UV/H2O2 oxidation and EUR 28.66/m3 for the Fenton process. Overall, electrochemical oxidation proved to be the most efficient and environmentally favorable technology for treating wastewater from LIB recycling, enabling compliance with strict discharge regulations while minimizing the chemical and energy demand.
Related
- Decoding Synergistic Pathways in Bimetallic MOFs for Advanced Oxidation Processes
- Peroxymonosulfate- and Persulfate-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes for Soil Remediation: A Review
- Advanced oxidation processes for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in aqueous media: evidence gaps, mechanistic insights and emerging directions
- Electrode Materials for Glyphosate Removal from Water by Advanced Anodic Oxidation Processes: A Critical Review
- Dynamic Coordination Microenvironments of Fe Single-Atom Catalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes: From Working-State Evolution to Pathway-Selective Regulation
BibTeX
@article{wagnerwenz2026efficiency,
title = {{Efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Wastewater from Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling}},
author = {Ronja Wagner-Wenz and Frederik Funk and Regine Peter and Tobias Necke and Fabian Brückner and Maximilian Philipp and Markus Engelhart and Anke Weidenkaff and Emanuel Ionescu},
journal = {Clean Technologies},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/cleantechnol8010013},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05789857v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Wastewater from Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling
AU - Ronja Wagner-Wenz
AU - Frederik Funk
AU - Regine Peter
AU - Tobias Necke
AU - Fabian Brückner
AU - Maximilian Philipp
AU - Markus Engelhart
AU - Anke Weidenkaff
AU - Emanuel Ionescu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
JO - Clean Technologies
DO - 10.3390/cleantechnol8010013
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05789857v1
AB - A treatment process was developed for effluents from direct physical lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling with a focus on the removal of organic contaminants. The high chemical oxygen demand to biological oxygen demand ratio (COD/BOD5) of 3.9–4.6 indicates that biological treatment is not feasible. Therefore, three advanced oxidation processes were evaluated: UV/H2O2 oxidation, the Fenton process and electrochemical oxidation. Two target scenarios were considered, namely compliance with the limit for discharge into the sewer system (COD = 800 mg/L) and compliance with the stricter limit for direct discharge into surface waters (COD = 200 mg/L). Under the investigated conditions, UV/H2O2 oxidation and the Fenton process did not meet the required discharge limits and exhibited high chemical consumption. In contrast, electrochemical oxidation achieved both discharge criteria with a lower energy demand, requiring 32.8 kWh/kgCODremoved for sewer discharge and 95.3 kWh/kgCODremoved for direct discharge. An economic assessment further identified electrochemical oxidation as the most cost-effective option, with treatment costs of EUR 6.63/m3, compared to EUR 17.31/m3 for UV/H2O2 oxidation and EUR 28.66/m3 for the Fenton process. Overall, electrochemical oxidation proved to be the most efficient and environmentally favorable technology for treating wastewater from LIB recycling, enabling compliance with strict discharge regulations while minimizing the chemical and energy demand.
SN - 2571-8797
ER -