Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Predictability-Guided Multiscale Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Direction under Extreme Shear

Abstract

Accurate multi-horizon wind direction forecasting is critical for turbine yaw control and grid security. Rapid directional shear (turning ≥ 90∘) challenges models via non-Euclidean geometry on S1, multiscale dynamics, and regime-dependent uncertainty. Conventional discrete models and foundation models suffer from mid-frequency phase lag and turning misalignments. We show that directional predictability decays at disparate rates across frequency subbands, rendering monolithic mechanisms suboptimal. We propose a predictability-guided paradigm: slow synoptic drift → deterministic regression; intermediate turning → continuous latent differential flows; unresolved turbulence → conditional residual diffusion; followed by causal recalibration. On a 10,000-sequence multi-year benchmark, our framework maintains calm-weather accuracy (Test MCE 38.48∘) while reducing extreme-turning error (Case 1 MCE 60.69∘ vs 70.42∘ for zero-shot foundation models). The circular CRPS reaches 22.36∘, with 93.88\% coverage at nominal 95\% (91.01\% out-of-distribution). Density estimation further reveals near-antipodal bimodal structure under severe shear (13.39\%--15.43\% tail mass ≥ 135∘), exposing a geometric bound where single-center calibration under-covers (81.56\%), motivating multimodal circular manifold learning.

Related

  1. Graph-based probabilistic earthquake clustering and forecasting in Sumatra
    Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefania Gentili, Luca Dal Zilio
    TectonophysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  2. Advancing Near-Term Water Quality Forecasting with Explainable Machine Learning and Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification
    Rohit Shukla, Cayelan C. Carey, Adrienne Breef-Pilz +1
    ACS ES&T waterPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. SDECast: Probabilistic Weather Forecasting in Continuous Time with Neural SDEs
    Maria Marchenko, Martin Andrae, Fredrik Lindsten +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  4. Njord: A Probabilistic Graph Neural Network for Ensemble Ocean Forecasting
    Daniel Holmberg, Joel Oskarsson, Erik Wikingsson +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text5 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXivOpenAlex
  5. Forecasting carbon-risk hotspots ahead of the extreme 2026 El Niño
    Xiaomeng Du, Runda Jiang, Philippe Ciais +14
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{shu2026predictabilityguided,
  title = {{Predictability-Guided Multiscale Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Direction under Extreme Shear}},
  author = {Hailong Shu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16707},
  eprint = {2609.16707},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16707},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Predictability-Guided Multiscale Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Direction under Extreme Shear
AU  - Hailong Shu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16707
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16707
AB  - Accurate multi-horizon wind direction forecasting is critical for turbine yaw control and grid security. Rapid directional shear (turning ≥ 90^∘) challenges models via non-Euclidean geometry on S^1, multiscale dynamics, and regime-dependent uncertainty. Conventional discrete models and foundation models suffer from mid-frequency phase lag and turning misalignments. We show that directional predictability decays at disparate rates across frequency subbands, rendering monolithic mechanisms suboptimal. We propose a predictability-guided paradigm: slow synoptic drift → deterministic regression; intermediate turning → continuous latent differential flows; unresolved turbulence → conditional residual diffusion; followed by causal recalibration. On a 10,000-sequence multi-year benchmark, our framework maintains calm-weather accuracy (Test MCE 38.48^∘) while reducing extreme-turning error (Case 1 MCE 60.69^∘ vs 70.42^∘ for zero-shot foundation models). The circular CRPS reaches 22.36^∘, with 93.88\% coverage at nominal 95\% (91.01\% out-of-distribution). Density estimation further reveals near-antipodal bimodal structure under severe shear (13.39\%--15.43\% tail mass ≥ 135^∘), exposing a geometric bound where single-center calibration under-covers (81.56\%), motivating multimodal circular manifold learning.
ER  -