A Dual Representation of Influence Functions for Linearizable Models
Abstract
In this paper, we present a dual representation of influence functions, whose computational complexity scales with dataset size rather than model size. Both analytically and experimentally, we show that this representation can be an efficient alternative to the original influence functions for estimating changes in parameters, model outputs and loss due to data point removal, when model size is large relative to dataset size, or when evaluating the original influence functions in parameter space is infeasible. The dual representation, however, is limited to linearizable models, which are models whose behavior can be approximated by their linearizations throughout training, and requires materializing a matrix, whose size grows with the product of model output dimension and dataset size.
Related
- Representation zeta functions of self-similar branched groups
- Representation zeta functions of wreath products with finite groups
- A BMO-type representation formula for the total variation of SBV functions in Heisenberg groups
- Representation of arbitrary rational functions and polynomials by non-Foster resistor-capacitor-inductor networks
- A Non-linearizable Action of S3 on Free Metabelian Lie and Associative Algebras
BibTeX
@misc{sun2026dual,
title = {{A Dual Representation of Influence Functions for Linearizable Models}},
author = {Zhenhuan Sun and Shahrokh Valaee},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.11239},
eprint = {2605.11239},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11239},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A Dual Representation of Influence Functions for Linearizable Models
AU - Zhenhuan Sun
AU - Shahrokh Valaee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.11239
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11239
AB - In this paper, we present a dual representation of influence functions, whose computational complexity scales with dataset size rather than model size. Both analytically and experimentally, we show that this representation can be an efficient alternative to the original influence functions for estimating changes in parameters, model outputs and loss due to data point removal, when model size is large relative to dataset size, or when evaluating the original influence functions in parameter space is infeasible. The dual representation, however, is limited to linearizable models, which are models whose behavior can be approximated by their linearizations throughout training, and requires materializing a matrix, whose size grows with the product of model output dimension and dataset size.
ER -