Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEnergy & Fuels

Operational Overview of the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Gas Production Test from Gas Hydrate on the Alaska North Slope

5 affiliations
  1. 1Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security , ,
  2. 2ASRC Energy Services, LLC , , ,
  3. 3Toyo Engineering Corporation , ,
  4. 4National Energy Technology Laboratory , , ,
  5. 5United States Geological Survey , , ,

Abstract

To understand the long-term production behavior of gas hydrate, an extended-duration gas production test was conducted under the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Collaborative Gas Hydrate R&D Project in Alaska. The production test began in September 2023 using an electric submersible pump (ESP). During ESP operation, stepwise depressurization was followed by an extended period of continuous operation under constant bottom-hole pressure (BHP). Pressure reduction below a level of ∼850 psi (∼400 psi of drawdown) was not possible due to strong surges in gas production rate, which caused the ESP to cease functioning (“gas lock”). To prevent gas lock, continuous operation under constant BHP was implemented at 850 psi and maintained for two months, with only one short-term disturbance for the safety shutdown valve (SSV) function test. No significant variation in either gas or water production rate was detected, and production continued at a stable rate of 70 mcf/d of gas and ∼10 bbl/d of water for 60 days. Although the continuous production under constant BHP provided insights into long-term production behavior, no upward or downward trend in the production volume associated was observed, indicating that further investigation is required to understand the nature of long-term production. Following the ESP operation, the ESP was replaced with a jet pump (JP) to mitigate gas lock. During JP operation, BHP was depressurized to very low levels (∼200 psi); however, this depressurization had only a limited effect on the formation pressure, which was assumed to be due to the presence of skin (buildup of a low-permeability fine-grained layer) associated with the sand control system. Injection of chemicals was attempted to remove this skin effect, but it was unsuccessful, resulting in higher differential pressure and low productivity. The test facility was successfully operated for ten months from September 2023 to July 2024. Within this period, there were 315 days of operation, including 64 days of nonproduction time due to various mechanical failures, issues relating to sand production, and replacement of the ESP with a JP. Post-test operations to retrieve the completion confirmed the ultimate failure of the aggressive sand control system installed. The operational finding with respect to sand control and artificial lift will inform future gas hydrate production test designs.

Related

  1. Overview of the Monitoring Program in the Alaska North Slope Extended-Duration Gas Production Test from Gas Hydrate
    Yoshihiro Nakatsuka, Norihiro Okinaka, Satoshi Ohtsuki +9
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND11 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  2. Project Overview of the 2023–2024 Production Test of Gas Hydrate on the Alaska North Slope
    Norihiro Okinaka, Yoshihiro Nakatsuka, Satoshi Ohtsuki +4
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text14 citedEnvironmental chemistryPMCEurope PMCOpenAlex
  3. Characterizing Physical Properties and Controls on Gas Hydrate Saturation Using Borehole Log and Core Data at the Alaska North Slope Gas Hydrate Production Test Site
    Seth S. Haines, Timothy S. Collett, William F. Waite +4
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text14 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  4. Multiphysical Responses of a Gas Hydrate Reservoir to Extended-Duration Gas Production on the Alaska North Slope
    Satoshi Ohtsuki, Yutaro Arima, Yusuke Takai +10
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND9 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
  5. Permeability and Compressibility of “Seal” Sediment Overlying the B1 Sand Gas Hydrate Reservoir: Hydrate 02 Geo Data Well, Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope
    Adrian Garcia, William F. Waite, Stephen C. Phillips +3
    Energy & FuelsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text5 citedEnvironmental chemistryOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{nakatsuka2026operational,
  title = {{Operational Overview of the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Gas Production Test from Gas Hydrate on the Alaska North Slope}},
  author = {Yoshihiro Nakatsuka and Norihiro Okinaka and Satoshi Ohtsuki and Yutaro Arima and Yusuke Takai and Douglas Cismoski and Patrick Curley and Shahryar Shirzadi and Kyojiro Kawaguchi and H. Sugiyama and Ray M. Boswell and Timothy S. Collett},
  journal = {Energy \& Fuels},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01130},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01130},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Operational Overview of the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Gas Production Test from Gas Hydrate on the Alaska North Slope
AU  - Yoshihiro Nakatsuka
AU  - Norihiro Okinaka
AU  - Satoshi Ohtsuki
AU  - Yutaro Arima
AU  - Yusuke Takai
AU  - Douglas Cismoski
AU  - Patrick Curley
AU  - Shahryar Shirzadi
AU  - Kyojiro Kawaguchi
AU  - H. Sugiyama
AU  - Ray M. Boswell
AU  - Timothy S. Collett
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Energy & Fuels
DO  - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01130
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01130
AB  - To understand the long-term production behavior of gas hydrate, an extended-duration gas production test was conducted under the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Collaborative Gas Hydrate R&D Project in Alaska. The production test began in September 2023 using an electric submersible pump (ESP). During ESP operation, stepwise depressurization was followed by an extended period of continuous operation under constant bottom-hole pressure (BHP). Pressure reduction below a level of ∼850 psi (∼400 psi of drawdown) was not possible due to strong surges in gas production rate, which caused the ESP to cease functioning (“gas lock”). To prevent gas lock, continuous operation under constant BHP was implemented at 850 psi and maintained for two months, with only one short-term disturbance for the safety shutdown valve (SSV) function test. No significant variation in either gas or water production rate was detected, and production continued at a stable rate of 70 mcf/d of gas and ∼10 bbl/d of water for 60 days. Although the continuous production under constant BHP provided insights into long-term production behavior, no upward or downward trend in the production volume associated was observed, indicating that further investigation is required to understand the nature of long-term production. Following the ESP operation, the ESP was replaced with a jet pump (JP) to mitigate gas lock. During JP operation, BHP was depressurized to very low levels (∼200 psi); however, this depressurization had only a limited effect on the formation pressure, which was assumed to be due to the presence of skin (buildup of a low-permeability fine-grained layer) associated with the sand control system. Injection of chemicals was attempted to remove this skin effect, but it was unsuccessful, resulting in higher differential pressure and low productivity. The test facility was successfully operated for ten months from September 2023 to July 2024. Within this period, there were 315 days of operation, including 64 days of nonproduction time due to various mechanical failures, issues relating to sand production, and replacement of the ESP with a JP. Post-test operations to retrieve the completion confirmed the ultimate failure of the aggressive sand control system installed. The operational finding with respect to sand control and artificial lift will inform future gas hydrate production test designs.
SN  - 0887-0624
SN  - 1520-5029
ER  -