Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Occupational heat stress in nurses working in hot environments and wearing personal protective equipment: mechanisms, health and safety implications, and prevention

Abstract

Climate change is increasing the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme heat, while infection prevention and other clinical demands require many nurses to work in personal protective equipment (PPE). Hot environments and PPE use can coexist in emergency departments, intensive care units, infectious disease wards, operating rooms, prehospital services, and other settings in which workload, restricted recovery opportunities, and limited access to hydration may compound thermal strain. This narrative review integrates current evidence on the pathways through which environmental heat, metabolic workload, and PPE-related resistance to heat loss may affect nurses and other healthcare workers. An initial set of 31 references identified by the authors was updated through a PubMed search conducted on 2 September 2026 (three queries covering January 2024 to September 2026, plus one calibration query without date limits). For each cited study, the population, design, main findings, and directness to nurses were extracted, and the evidence was synthesized narratively across four domains: pathways, health and safety implications, risk assessment and monitoring, and prevention. Available studies, mostly of mixed healthcare-worker populations, consistently describe thermal discomfort, sweating, thirst, fatigue, headache, dizziness, and impaired well-being among PPE-exposed healthcare workers; however, nurse-specific longitudinal evidence and direct evidence linking heat strain to occupational injuries or patient-safety events remain limited. Effective prevention therefore requires more than individual coping. Healthcare facilities should combine environmental surveillance, task and PPE-sensitive risk assessment, accessible hydration and cooled recovery areas, work-rest and staffing arrangements, risk-appropriate PPE, personal cooling where feasible, symptom reporting, and emergency response. Future research should prioritize nurse-specific prospective cohorts, standardized exposure and outcome measures that include nurses’ well-being and occupational safety, field-based intervention studies, and implementation outcomes across diverse climates and clinical settings. Integrating occupational heat protection into climate-resilient health-system planning may protect both the nursing workforce and continuity of care.

Related

  1. Differential risk and protective factors for conventional adenomas and serrated lesions: implications for colorectal cancer prevention
    Junjie Cai, Yiliu Huang, Yi Luo +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. Chronic Occupational Stress and Immune–Inflammatory Dysregulation: Mechanisms, Clinical Consequences, Biomarkers and Implications for Occupational Medicine
    Ancuța-Ramona Boicea Camen, Mihail Virgil Boldeanu, Daniel Cosmin Caragea +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Protecting the invisible health workforce: experiences and occupational safety challenges of facial protective equipment use among central sterile supply department workers
    Huiling Rao, Aliya Tuerdi, Xue Zhou +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. The Intersection of Psychological Distress, Cardiovascular Health, and Allostatic Load in Occupational Settings: Implications for Preventive Medicine, Occupational Health, and Clinical Management
    Eunice Kwan Chae Park, Woo Hyun Park, Eun-Young Jeon
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Psychosocial occupational health in military work environments: cross-sectional findings among Spanish enlisted military personnel
    José Javier Miranda Mayo, María M. Fernández-Valera, María Concepción Pérez-Cárceles
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{xu2026occupational,
  title = {{Occupational heat stress in nurses working in hot environments and wearing personal protective equipment: mechanisms, health and safety implications, and prevention}},
  author = {Xiaoxue Xu and Xuemei Wei},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1986823},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1986823},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Occupational heat stress in nurses working in hot environments and wearing personal protective equipment: mechanisms, health and safety implications, and prevention
AU  - Xiaoxue Xu
AU  - Xuemei Wei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1986823
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1986823
AB  - Climate change is increasing the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme heat, while infection prevention and other clinical demands require many nurses to work in personal protective equipment (PPE). Hot environments and PPE use can coexist in emergency departments, intensive care units, infectious disease wards, operating rooms, prehospital services, and other settings in which workload, restricted recovery opportunities, and limited access to hydration may compound thermal strain. This narrative review integrates current evidence on the pathways through which environmental heat, metabolic workload, and PPE-related resistance to heat loss may affect nurses and other healthcare workers. An initial set of 31 references identified by the authors was updated through a PubMed search conducted on 2 September 2026 (three queries covering January 2024 to September 2026, plus one calibration query without date limits). For each cited study, the population, design, main findings, and directness to nurses were extracted, and the evidence was synthesized narratively across four domains: pathways, health and safety implications, risk assessment and monitoring, and prevention. Available studies, mostly of mixed healthcare-worker populations, consistently describe thermal discomfort, sweating, thirst, fatigue, headache, dizziness, and impaired well-being among PPE-exposed healthcare workers; however, nurse-specific longitudinal evidence and direct evidence linking heat strain to occupational injuries or patient-safety events remain limited. Effective prevention therefore requires more than individual coping. Healthcare facilities should combine environmental surveillance, task and PPE-sensitive risk assessment, accessible hydration and cooled recovery areas, work-rest and staffing arrangements, risk-appropriate PPE, personal cooling where feasible, symptom reporting, and emergency response. Future research should prioritize nurse-specific prospective cohorts, standardized exposure and outcome measures that include nurses’ well-being and occupational safety, field-based intervention studies, and implementation outcomes across diverse climates and clinical settings. Integrating occupational heat protection into climate-resilient health-system planning may protect both the nursing workforce and continuity of care.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -