Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYWorld Allergy Organization Journal

Biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy: A World Allergy Organization survey

14 more authors
25 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Corresponding author. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  2. 2Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  3. 3Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
  5. 5Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
  6. 6Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
  7. 7Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
  8. 8Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital and CUF Tejo Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal; National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Institut Desbrest d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  9. 9Hospital Universitario HLA Inmaculada Granada, Spain
  10. 10School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  11. 11Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  12. 12Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
  13. 13Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  14. 14Department of Allergy, Guthrie Medical Group Sayre, Pennsylvania, USA
  15. 15Department of Adult Clinical Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
  16. 16Allergy Immunology Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa
  17. 17Oncology Service, University Hospital Dr. José Eleuterio González, Autonomous University of Nuevo León Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
  18. 18Population Allergy, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia; Deakin Lifespan Institute, School of Psychology, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  19. 19University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA
  20. 20Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona Integrated University Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  21. 21Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
  22. 22Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  23. 23University Hospital Dr Dragisa Misovic Belgrade, Serbia
  24. 24Center for Molecular Biomedicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  25. 25Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, France; Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier - INSERM, Montpellier, France; WHO Collaborating Centre on Scientific Classification Support, Montpellier, France

Abstract

Rationale: Biologic therapies are an increasingly important treatment option for atopic diseases, which commonly affect women of reproductive age. However, global barriers to prescribing biologic therapies to pregnant patients remain poorly understood. Methods: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Junior Members Steering Group conducted a global, web-based survey of healthcare professionals to evaluate prescribing patterns and barriers to the use of biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. Results: From 322 total participants representing 71 countries, 77 of 314 (24.5%) reported prescribing biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. The most frequently prescribed biologic therapies during pregnancy were omalizumab (79.2%) and dupilumab (32.5%), followed by benralizumab (7.8%), mepolizumab (7.8%), tralokinumab (3.9%), tezepelumab (2.6%), and reslizumab (1.3%). Twenty-three respondents encountered barriers to prescribing biologic therapies to pregnant patients, including patients’ concerns about the impact on pregnancy (82.6%), adverse reactions (47.8%), difficulty securing insurance coverage (13.0%), and high patient costs (8.7%). Reported biologic therapies discontinued due to pregnancy included dupilumab (39.1%), mepolizumab (26.1%), omalizumab (26.1%), and benralizumab (13.0%). Twelve of the 23 healthcare professionals who discontinued biologic therapies reported that their pregnant patients experienced worsening symptoms after stopping. Seven respondents (9.9%) reported adverse maternal or fetal outcomes in pregnant patients receiving biologic treatment for atopic diseases, including allergic/immune disorders (3), congenital defects (2), miscarriage (1), and preeclampsia (1). Only 42.3% of respondents who prescribed biologics to pregnant patients reported enrolling these patients in a pregnancy registry. Conclusions: Significant barriers limit the prescriptions of biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. Multidisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry is essential for developing strategies to overcome these barriers and improve access to biologic therapy for pregnant patients.

Related

  1. The BAFF/APRIL system in autoimmune nephropathy: from pathogenesis to targeted biologic therapies.
    Yingjie Jia, Zhenping Yu, Yamin Xue +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development of a tool to measure patient-oriented outcomes for Veterans with inflammatory arthritis initiating self-administered biologic therapies.
    Amanda Margolis, Clara Nickel, Olayinka Shiyanbola +3
    Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Phenotype Switching in Pediatric Inflammatory Skin Diseases During Biologic Therapy: A Literature Review Focused on Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis
    Chu-Fei Tsai, Yu Yu
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Editorial: Translational strategies for chronic lung diseases: emerging therapies and precision medicine
    Poonam Arora, Lalit Mohan Nainwal
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  5. Granulocyte-targeted therapies for airway diseases
    Luciana Tavares, Hong Yong Peh, Wan Shun Daniel Tan +4
    Pharmacological ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not stated26 citedPhysiologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{sergioechiarella2026biologic,
  title = {{Biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy: A World Allergy Organization survey}},
  author = {Sergio E. Chiarella, MD and Isabella Novoa-Caicedo, MD and Sara M. Jenkins, MS and Divya Shah, MD and Ishitha Jagadish, MD and Leah Ishmael, DO and Fnu Shakuntulla, MD and Andrea Sitek, MD and Barbara Kong-Cardoso, MD and Isabel Fernandez de Alba, MD and Duy Le Pham, MD, PhD and Agnes Sze-yin Leung, MBChB and Daria Levina, MD, MSc and Shun Chi Ryan Lo, MD and Matthew Norris, MD and Nida Öztop, MD and Thulja Trikamjee, MD and Rosalaura Villarreal-Gonzalez, MD, PhD and Yichao Wang, MD, PhD and Lyda Cuervo-Pardo, MD and Marco Caminati, MD and Razvigor Darlenski, MD, PhD and Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada, MD and Ivana Filipovic, MD, PhD and Tu HK. Trinh, MD, PhD and Luciana Kase Tanno, MD, PhD},
  journal = {World Allergy Organization Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101485},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101485},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy: A World Allergy Organization survey
AU  - Sergio E. Chiarella, MD
AU  - Isabella Novoa-Caicedo, MD
AU  - Sara M. Jenkins, MS
AU  - Divya Shah, MD
AU  - Ishitha Jagadish, MD
AU  - Leah Ishmael, DO
AU  - Fnu Shakuntulla, MD
AU  - Andrea Sitek, MD
AU  - Barbara Kong-Cardoso, MD
AU  - Isabel Fernandez de Alba, MD
AU  - Duy Le Pham, MD, PhD
AU  - Agnes Sze-yin Leung, MBChB
AU  - Daria Levina, MD, MSc
AU  - Shun Chi Ryan Lo, MD
AU  - Matthew Norris, MD
AU  - Nida Öztop, MD
AU  - Thulja Trikamjee, MD
AU  - Rosalaura Villarreal-Gonzalez, MD, PhD
AU  - Yichao Wang, MD, PhD
AU  - Lyda Cuervo-Pardo, MD
AU  - Marco Caminati, MD
AU  - Razvigor Darlenski, MD, PhD
AU  - Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada, MD
AU  - Ivana Filipovic, MD, PhD
AU  - Tu HK. Trinh, MD, PhD
AU  - Luciana Kase Tanno, MD, PhD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - World Allergy Organization Journal
DO  - 10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101485
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2026.101485
AB  - Rationale: Biologic therapies are an increasingly important treatment option for atopic diseases, which commonly affect women of reproductive age. However, global barriers to prescribing biologic therapies to pregnant patients remain poorly understood. Methods: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Junior Members Steering Group conducted a global, web-based survey of healthcare professionals to evaluate prescribing patterns and barriers to the use of biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. Results: From 322 total participants representing 71 countries, 77 of 314 (24.5%) reported prescribing biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. The most frequently prescribed biologic therapies during pregnancy were omalizumab (79.2%) and dupilumab (32.5%), followed by benralizumab (7.8%), mepolizumab (7.8%), tralokinumab (3.9%), tezepelumab (2.6%), and reslizumab (1.3%). Twenty-three respondents encountered barriers to prescribing biologic therapies to pregnant patients, including patients’ concerns about the impact on pregnancy (82.6%), adverse reactions (47.8%), difficulty securing insurance coverage (13.0%), and high patient costs (8.7%). Reported biologic therapies discontinued due to pregnancy included dupilumab (39.1%), mepolizumab (26.1%), omalizumab (26.1%), and benralizumab (13.0%). Twelve of the 23 healthcare professionals who discontinued biologic therapies reported that their pregnant patients experienced worsening symptoms after stopping. Seven respondents (9.9%) reported adverse maternal or fetal outcomes in pregnant patients receiving biologic treatment for atopic diseases, including allergic/immune disorders (3), congenital defects (2), miscarriage (1), and preeclampsia (1). Only 42.3% of respondents who prescribed biologics to pregnant patients reported enrolling these patients in a pregnancy registry. Conclusions: Significant barriers limit the prescriptions of biologic therapies for atopic diseases during pregnancy. Multidisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry is essential for developing strategies to overcome these barriers and improve access to biologic therapy for pregnant patients.
SN  - 1939-4551
ER  -