Chimpanzees and Elephants Can Be Used as Reliable Flagship‐Umbrella Species for Eco‐Labels
Abstract
Eco‐labels are effective financial tools for implementing biodiversity‐based land management near protected areas. When eco‐labels market flagship species conservation, it is essential to ensure that these species also serve as umbrella species, benefiting broader biodiversity. This study assessed the potential of flagship species, chimpanzees and elephants, to act as umbrella species by analyzing their co‐occurrence with other species and evaluating species‐specific responses to anthropogenic pressures. Using 61,348 camera trap clips and illegal activities recorded during 4 years in Sebitoli protected forest (Kibale National Park, Uganda) surrounded by a highly anthropized landscape, we built a joint Species Distribution Model for chimpanzees, elephants, and 29 other taxa, including five threatened taxa. The co‐occurrence matrix showed that chimpanzees and elephants were respectively co‐occurrent with 26 and 20 other taxa, including respectively four and three threatened taxa. The intensity of illegal activities targeting wildlife (snaring) was significantly negatively impacting the detection of 18 of the taxa studied, including chimpanzees and elephants and three other threatened taxa. The intensity of illegal activities targeting flora had a significant negative impact on the detection of eight taxa, including elephants. Co‐occurrence patterns supported the potential umbrella species role of chimpanzees and elephants through the shared benefits of their habitat conservation. Results allowed us to recommend the reduction of illegal activities, especially snaring, as a relevant shared conservation action to promote within future label standards. Although chimpanzees co‐occurred with more species than elephants, elephants appeared as better surrogates for anthropogenic threats than chimpanzees, underlining their complementarity as umbrella species.
Related
- Importance of elephants for dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem functions
- Influence of Mating Systems, Contemporary Niches, and Historical Demography on the Genetic Patterns of Flagship Plants From the Amazonian Cangas.
- CypA is a molecular barrier to HIV emergence from Eastern chimpanzees
- Bonobos and chimpanzees: revisiting the aggression dichotomy
- Increased Demographic Turnover and Isolation Precede Social Fragmentation in Asian Elephants
BibTeX
@article{auger2026chimpanzees,
title = {{Chimpanzees and Elephants Can Be Used as Reliable Flagship‐Umbrella Species for Eco‐Labels}},
author = {Claire Auger and Frédérique Montfort and Beatriz Bellón and John Justice Tibesigwa and Harold Rugonge and Raymond Katumba and Cédric Rabany and Sabrina Krief},
journal = {Biotropica},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1111/btp.70143},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05737660v1},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Chimpanzees and Elephants Can Be Used as Reliable Flagship‐Umbrella Species for Eco‐Labels
AU - Claire Auger
AU - Frédérique Montfort
AU - Beatriz Bellón
AU - John Justice Tibesigwa
AU - Harold Rugonge
AU - Raymond Katumba
AU - Cédric Rabany
AU - Sabrina Krief
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
JO - Biotropica
DO - 10.1111/btp.70143
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05737660v1
AB - Eco‐labels are effective financial tools for implementing biodiversity‐based land management near protected areas. When eco‐labels market flagship species conservation, it is essential to ensure that these species also serve as umbrella species, benefiting broader biodiversity. This study assessed the potential of flagship species, chimpanzees and elephants, to act as umbrella species by analyzing their co‐occurrence with other species and evaluating species‐specific responses to anthropogenic pressures. Using 61,348 camera trap clips and illegal activities recorded during 4 years in Sebitoli protected forest (Kibale National Park, Uganda) surrounded by a highly anthropized landscape, we built a joint Species Distribution Model for chimpanzees, elephants, and 29 other taxa, including five threatened taxa. The co‐occurrence matrix showed that chimpanzees and elephants were respectively co‐occurrent with 26 and 20 other taxa, including respectively four and three threatened taxa. The intensity of illegal activities targeting wildlife (snaring) was significantly negatively impacting the detection of 18 of the taxa studied, including chimpanzees and elephants and three other threatened taxa. The intensity of illegal activities targeting flora had a significant negative impact on the detection of eight taxa, including elephants. Co‐occurrence patterns supported the potential umbrella species role of chimpanzees and elephants through the shared benefits of their habitat conservation. Results allowed us to recommend the reduction of illegal activities, especially snaring, as a relevant shared conservation action to promote within future label standards. Although chimpanzees co‐occurred with more species than elephants, elephants appeared as better surrogates for anthropogenic threats than chimpanzees, underlining their complementarity as umbrella species.
SN - 0006-3606
SN - 1744-7429
ER -