Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Intersecting families with large covering number - On a conjecture of Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige

Abstract

Stability theorems on intersecting families are often formulated via the covering number of set families. Let M(n,k,t) denote the maximum size of a k-uniform intersecting family ℱ⊆ binom[n]k with covering number t. It is known that for any fixed t and fixed k sufficiently large relative to t, one has M(n,k,t)=(pt−1(k)+o(1))(k)binomnk as n tends to infinity, where pt−1(k) is the maximum number of covers of size t−1 that a k-uniform intersecting family can have provided its covering number is t−1. Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige conjectured that pt(k)=kt−binomt2kt−1+Ot(kt−2) for fixed t as k tends to infinity and they also showed that pt(k)=kt−b(t)kt−1+Ot(kt−2), where b(t) is defined as the extremum of the following minimization problem. Suppose a k-uniform intersecting family ℱ of covering number t can be partitioned into ℱ1,…,ℱt such that for every i there exists a set Xi with Xi ⊆ Fi for all Fi∈ℱi and the Xi's are pairwise disjoint and non-empty. Then b(t) is the minimum of ∑i=1t(k−|Xi|) over all such families, partitions and Xi's. In accordance with the conjecture on pt(k), Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige conjectured b(t)=binomt2 for all t≥ 2 and proved 1/√2⌊ (t−1)/2⌋3/2≤ b(t)≤ binomt2. In this note, we present a counterexample to the conjecture showing b(t)≤ 2√2 t3/2√(log t) +O(t3/2) and improve the lower bound to 2/33/4t3/2−O(t)≤ b(t). The counterexample was found by ChatGPT 6.1Sol, the lower bound proof is due to the human author.

Related

  1. Large Maximal Intersecting Families with Covering Number Three
    Huajun Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. The maximum size of intersecting k-graphs with covering number k
    Peter Frankl, Jian Wang, Yaoran Yang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. A Sharp Product Bound for Disjoint Cross-Intersecting 3-Graphs with Covering Number Three
    Arthur F. Ramos, David B. Hulak, Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Alon's conjecture on intersecting families of graphs
    Jie Han, Bin Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. On the Frankl--Tokushige conjecture and almost complete r-cross t-intersection theorems for vector spaces
    Yao Li, Benjian Lv, Jie Wen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{patkos2026intersecting,
  title = {{Intersecting families with large covering number - On a conjecture of Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige}},
  author = {Balázs Patkós},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.28029},
  eprint = {2610.28029},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28029},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Intersecting families with large covering number - On a conjecture of Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige
AU  - Balázs Patkós
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.28029
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28029
AB  - Stability theorems on intersecting families are often formulated via the covering number of set families. Let M(n,k,t) denote the maximum size of a k-uniform intersecting family ℱ⊆ binom[n]k with covering number t. It is known that for any fixed t and fixed k sufficiently large relative to t, one has M(n,k,t)=(p_t−1(k)+o(1))(k)binomnk as n tends to infinity, where p_t−1(k) is the maximum number of covers of size t−1 that a k-uniform intersecting family can have provided its covering number is t−1. Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige conjectured that p_t(k)=k^t−binomt2k^t−1+O_t(k^t−2) for fixed t as k tends to infinity and they also showed that p_t(k)=k^t−b(t)k^t−1+O_t(k^t−2), where b(t) is defined as the extremum of the following minimization problem. Suppose a k-uniform intersecting family ℱ of covering number t can be partitioned into ℱ_1,…,ℱ_t such that for every i there exists a set X_i with X_i ⊆ F_i for all F_i∈ℱ_i and the X_i's are pairwise disjoint and non-empty. Then b(t) is the minimum of ∑_i=1^t(k−|X_i|) over all such families, partitions and X_i's. In accordance with the conjecture on p_t(k), Frankl, Ota, and Tokushige conjectured b(t)=binomt2 for all t≥ 2 and proved 1/√2⌊ (t−1)/2⌋^3/2≤ b(t)≤ binomt2. In this note, we present a counterexample to the conjecture showing b(t)≤ 2√2 t^3/2√(log t) +O(t^3/2) and improve the lower bound to 2/3^3/4t^3/2−O(t)≤ b(t). The counterexample was found by ChatGPT 6.1Sol, the lower bound proof is due to the human author.
ER  -