Palliative care educational intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy for health-related quality of life in patients with incurable cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
6 affiliations
- 1Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- 2Fudan University Taizhou Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu China
- 3Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong China
- 4Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- 5School of Public Health & Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- 6State Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, School of Public Health, National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Background: Patients with incurable cancer prioritize health-related quality of life (HRQoL)—a key target of palliative care. But shortages of palliative care professionals create critical access barriers, leaving patients with unmet HRQoL needs. In addition to palliative care provided by professionals, non-pharmacological strategies such as palliative care educational intervention (PEI) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been proposed to address these gaps. Recent studies about PEI have shown promise in improving HRQoL for patients with incurable cancer. However, it remains an emerging approach that has not been thoroughly and systematically evaluated, especially compared with CBT—an intervention with extensive systematic reviews. Furthermore, due to the scarcity of head-to-head comparisons between PEI and CBT, a network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to clarify their relative effectiveness.
Methods: This systematic review and NMA will include randomized controlled trials evaluating PEI and/or CBT in adults (≥ 18 years) with incurable cancer. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) and trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov) will be searched from inception. The primary outcome is HRQoL (measured via validated scales such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30]); secondary outcomes include symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression) assessed by validated scales. Effect sizes (standardized mean differences [SMD]) will be calculated, and SMDs will be re-expressed to the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/quality of life scale. NMA will estimate relative effects, with subgroup analyses (based on delivery setting, mode, etc.) and sensitivity analyses. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) will assess evidence quality.
Discussion: Comparing PEI with CBT will offer evidence for palliative care professionals and policymakers. Clear PEI definition and comprehensive literature retrieval are foundational to this systematic review and NMA, while analyzing study and intervention details may address heterogeneity in HRQoL outcomes and guide development of more effective interventions.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251146822.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8.
Related
- Rehabilitative efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome : A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effect of an educational indoor air quality intervention on cognitive status, sleep quality, balance, and sick building syndrome in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
- Early-life family socioeconomic and educational impacts on adult EEG and behavioral signatures of visual cognitive function
- The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy for sleep and glycemic outcomes in people with diabetes : A systematic review and meta-analysis
- A Culturally Tailored, Behavioral Theory–Informed Educational Intervention for Pregnant Women to Improve Postnatal Care Use and Safe Maternal and Newborn Care Practices in Ethiopia: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
BibTeX
@article{xue2026palliative,
title = {{Palliative care educational intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy for health-related quality of life in patients with incurable cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis}},
author = {Hao Xue and Ying Yu and Yuan Zhang and Yang Yang and Jiayun Zhang and Chen Suo and Xingdong Chen},
journal = {Systematic Reviews},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Palliative care educational intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy for health-related quality of life in patients with incurable cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
AU - Hao Xue
AU - Ying Yu
AU - Yuan Zhang
AU - Yang Yang
AU - Jiayun Zhang
AU - Chen Suo
AU - Xingdong Chen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/10
JO - Systematic Reviews
DO - 10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8
AB - Background: Patients with incurable cancer prioritize health-related quality of life (HRQoL)—a key target of palliative care. But shortages of palliative care professionals create critical access barriers, leaving patients with unmet HRQoL needs. In addition to palliative care provided by professionals, non-pharmacological strategies such as palliative care educational intervention (PEI) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been proposed to address these gaps. Recent studies about PEI have shown promise in improving HRQoL for patients with incurable cancer. However, it remains an emerging approach that has not been thoroughly and systematically evaluated, especially compared with CBT—an intervention with extensive systematic reviews. Furthermore, due to the scarcity of head-to-head comparisons between PEI and CBT, a network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to clarify their relative effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review and NMA will include randomized controlled trials evaluating PEI and/or CBT in adults (≥ 18 years) with incurable cancer. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) and trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov) will be searched from inception. The primary outcome is HRQoL (measured via validated scales such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30]); secondary outcomes include symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression) assessed by validated scales. Effect sizes (standardized mean differences [SMD]) will be calculated, and SMDs will be re-expressed to the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/quality of life scale. NMA will estimate relative effects, with subgroup analyses (based on delivery setting, mode, etc.) and sensitivity analyses. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) will assess evidence quality. Discussion: Comparing PEI with CBT will offer evidence for palliative care professionals and policymakers. Clear PEI definition and comprehensive literature retrieval are foundational to this systematic review and NMA, while analyzing study and intervention details may address heterogeneity in HRQoL outcomes and guide development of more effective interventions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251146822. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03286-8.
SN - 2046-4053
ER -