Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPharmaceutics

PBPK Modeling Investigation of IVIVE-Observed Pharmacokinetic Divergence for VU0467319: A Mechanistic Refinement Workflow for Low-Solubility Compounds.

  1. 1Warren Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
  2. 2Vanderbilt Institute for Therapeutic Advances, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
  3. 3Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: VU0467319 (VU319), an M1 muscarinic positive allosteric modulator evaluated in Phase 1 studies, exhibits subproportional dose-exposure scaling typical of poorly soluble compounds. This study applies physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to investigate the sources of divergence between IVIVE-based predictions and observed single ascending dose (SAD) clinical pharmacokinetics. Methods: A whole-body PBPK model was developed in Simcyp Simulator V24 using in vitro ADME and physicochemical inputs. Clinical pharmacokinetic data were used for sequential, hypothesis-driven model refinement of distribution, clearance, and absorption parameters. Model performance was evaluated at 60-600 mg fasted using virtual populations demographically matched to their corresponding clinical cohort. Results: A Kp scalar of 0.125 recovered model Vss within the observed Vz/F bound; a 10.7-fold downward CLint correction (32.2 to 3 µL/min/mg) reconciled clearance; and a 1 µm particle radius recovered AUC0-∞ within 6% across 60-240 mg. The model met predefined performance thresholds across the four independent verification doses (geometric mean fold error 1.45 for AUC and 1.56 for Cmax; three of four doses within 2-fold), with progressive underprediction at the highest doses (≥400 mg). Supersaturation-ratio analysis indicated that, within the model, sustained supersaturation was unlikely to explain the high-dose underprediction. The refined model reproduced the observed sub-proportional dose-exposure relationship through 240 mg, but underpredicted exposure at 400 and 600 mg. Conclusions: Structured PBPK refinement identified dissolution-limited absorption as the most likely primary contributor to IVIVE-observed divergence for VU319, with secondary contributions from clearance and distribution. These model-derived mechanisms remain hypotheses that require experimental confirmation. The workflow may provide a structured refinement framework for other low-solubility compounds where IVIVE assumptions diverge from observed pharmacokinetics.

Related

  1. Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Extended-Release Metformin in Obese South African Women Living with HIV on Dolutegravir.
    Rohan M Benecke, Veshni Pillay-Fuentes Lorente, Eric Decloedt +1
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeuticsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  2. Bidirectional relationship between diabetes and pancreatic cancer: from mechanistic investigation to clinical application
    Jiangmin Wu, Tingting Jiang, Xiaojia Li +2
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
  3. Identification and mechanistic investigation of novel biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy through hypoxia- and cuproptosis-associated gene analysis
    Rong Feng, Xia Wang, Xiaodong Li +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyImmunologyPLOS
  4. Physics-consistent equation discovery for drug solubility in supercritical CO₂ through symbolic regression and domain generalization
    Adel Alhowyan, Ahmad J. Obaidullah, Wael A. Mahdi
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. HSPiP, computational, and thermodynamic models-based solubility validation of tofacitinib in PEG400 – water system, shelf-life estimation, and GastroPlus-enabled predictive in vivo performance
    Afzal Hussain, Zahid Rafiq, Iman Ehsan +2
    DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{abisogun2026pbpk,
  title = {{PBPK Modeling Investigation of IVIVE-Observed Pharmacokinetic Divergence for VU0467319: A Mechanistic Refinement Workflow for Low-Solubility Compounds.}},
  author = {Akinwunmi A Abisogun and Srinivasan Krishnan and Craig W Lindsley and Olivier Boutaud},
  journal = {Pharmaceutics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/pharmaceutics18101254},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42942786},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - PBPK Modeling Investigation of IVIVE-Observed Pharmacokinetic Divergence for VU0467319: A Mechanistic Refinement Workflow for Low-Solubility Compounds.
AU  - Akinwunmi A Abisogun
AU  - Srinivasan Krishnan
AU  - Craig W Lindsley
AU  - Olivier Boutaud
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Pharmaceutics
DO  - 10.3390/pharmaceutics18101254
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42942786
AB  - Background/Objectives: VU0467319 (VU319), an M1 muscarinic positive allosteric modulator evaluated in Phase 1 studies, exhibits subproportional dose-exposure scaling typical of poorly soluble compounds. This study applies physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to investigate the sources of divergence between IVIVE-based predictions and observed single ascending dose (SAD) clinical pharmacokinetics. Methods: A whole-body PBPK model was developed in Simcyp Simulator V24 using in vitro ADME and physicochemical inputs. Clinical pharmacokinetic data were used for sequential, hypothesis-driven model refinement of distribution, clearance, and absorption parameters. Model performance was evaluated at 60-600 mg fasted using virtual populations demographically matched to their corresponding clinical cohort. Results: A Kp scalar of 0.125 recovered model Vss within the observed Vz/F bound; a 10.7-fold downward CLint correction (32.2 to 3 µL/min/mg) reconciled clearance; and a 1 µm particle radius recovered AUC0-∞ within 6% across 60-240 mg. The model met predefined performance thresholds across the four independent verification doses (geometric mean fold error 1.45 for AUC and 1.56 for Cmax; three of four doses within 2-fold), with progressive underprediction at the highest doses (≥400 mg). Supersaturation-ratio analysis indicated that, within the model, sustained supersaturation was unlikely to explain the high-dose underprediction. The refined model reproduced the observed sub-proportional dose-exposure relationship through 240 mg, but underpredicted exposure at 400 and 600 mg. Conclusions: Structured PBPK refinement identified dissolution-limited absorption as the most likely primary contributor to IVIVE-observed divergence for VU319, with secondary contributions from clearance and distribution. These model-derived mechanisms remain hypotheses that require experimental confirmation. The workflow may provide a structured refinement framework for other low-solubility compounds where IVIVE assumptions diverge from observed pharmacokinetics.
SN  - 1999-4923
ER  -