Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

From random patterns to nanophotonic structures: Electromagnetic field prediction without retraining

Abstract

Electromagnetic surrogate solvers can accelerate nanophotonic design, but their broader use requires accurate predictions for unseen geometries and material arrangements. Training on random dielectric patterns enables direct prediction of complex electromagnetic fields in diverse two-dimensional nanophotonic structures without retraining. The network takes spatial permittivity distributions as inputs, with training samples drawn from a dataset comprising 700,140 combinations of 5,001 random freeform dielectric patterns and 140 relative permittivities from 2.1 to 16.0. The trained model predicts fields for aperiodic bar arrays, manually defined patterns, inverse-designed metalenses, inverse-designed binary structures, and two-material freeform patterns excluded from training. Across 35,441 geometry-permittivity samples, a dilated residual network achieves average relative field errors of 1.4%-7.6%. For 6,950 inverse-designed metalens samples, the three most accurate architectures predict transmitted power with median relative errors of 0.7%-0.9%. Accuracy depends on refractive index and structural scale, with greater errors for patterns coarser than those used for training. These results demonstrate transfer to independently constructed geometries and to new spatial arrangements of dielectric values not represented in the training. Random-pattern training therefore supports reuse of electromagnetic surrogates across multiple structural families, providing a basis for sharing training costs among material screening, iterative optical design, and fabrication-tolerance analysis.

Related

  1. Versatile Sleeve-and-Bulk Fabrication of Inversely Designed Nanophotonic Structures with High Pattern Transfer Fidelity
    Lan Hoang Mai, Radheya Sham Sarode, William G. Eshbaugh +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsarXiv
  2. Scalable integration of silicon carbide color centers into nanophotonic structures
    Raphael Wörnle, Jonas Schmid, Dennis Grüner +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. GREEN-PRECONDITIONED DYNAMIC GRAPH NEURAL OPERATOR FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD PREDICTION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA
    Gao zhiwei, Zhijie Liu, chengan sun +2
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  4. Machine learning for the design and prediction of soft-magnetic electromagnetic shielding FeCo-based alloys in laser cladding
    Luting Wang, Suiyuan Chen, Xiancheng Zhu +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Failure load prediction of a tubular bonded structures using a coupled criterion
    Jérémy Le Pavic, Thomas Bonnemains, Éric Lolive +3
    Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026from,
  title = {{From random patterns to nanophotonic structures: Electromagnetic field prediction without retraining}},
  author = {Jiwoo Kim and Mingyu Park and Chanik Kang and Hyewon Suk and Haejun Chung},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27769},
  eprint = {2610.27769},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27769},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From random patterns to nanophotonic structures: Electromagnetic field prediction without retraining
AU  - Jiwoo Kim
AU  - Mingyu Park
AU  - Chanik Kang
AU  - Hyewon Suk
AU  - Haejun Chung
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27769
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27769
AB  - Electromagnetic surrogate solvers can accelerate nanophotonic design, but their broader use requires accurate predictions for unseen geometries and material arrangements. Training on random dielectric patterns enables direct prediction of complex electromagnetic fields in diverse two-dimensional nanophotonic structures without retraining. The network takes spatial permittivity distributions as inputs, with training samples drawn from a dataset comprising 700,140 combinations of 5,001 random freeform dielectric patterns and 140 relative permittivities from 2.1 to 16.0. The trained model predicts fields for aperiodic bar arrays, manually defined patterns, inverse-designed metalenses, inverse-designed binary structures, and two-material freeform patterns excluded from training. Across 35,441 geometry-permittivity samples, a dilated residual network achieves average relative field errors of 1.4%-7.6%. For 6,950 inverse-designed metalens samples, the three most accurate architectures predict transmitted power with median relative errors of 0.7%-0.9%. Accuracy depends on refractive index and structural scale, with greater errors for patterns coarser than those used for training. These results demonstrate transfer to independently constructed geometries and to new spatial arrangements of dielectric values not represented in the training. Random-pattern training therefore supports reuse of electromagnetic surrogates across multiple structural families, providing a basis for sharing training costs among material screening, iterative optical design, and fabrication-tolerance analysis.
ER  -