Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC endocrine disorders

Current status of anti-obesity medications and performance, an EHR based survey.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Quantitative and Systems Health Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
  2. 2Department of Health Data Science and AI, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  3. 3Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  4. 4Department of Quantitative and Systems Health Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) establish the efficacy of anti-obesity medications (AOMs), their real-world effectiveness, inter-individual variability, and weight regain post discontinuation remain poorly characterized across diverse, large scale populations.Methods

Electronic health records with pharmacy dispensation of obesity or overweight individuals were retrieved from local UT-Physician and nationwide EPIC COSMOS databases. AOMs were analyzed for short to long-term effectiveness on obesity relevant metrics.Results

From the two cohorts, 71,318 (11·7%) and 1 M (27·9%) individuals documented AOM exposures, respectively, with about 70% individuals experiencing more than one treatment session. Tirzepatide and Semaglutide outperformed other AOMs and were associated with up to 9·6[IQR:11]% and 6·2[IQR:11]% weight loss, respectively, and both improved blood pressure, HbA1c, and lipid profile. The median exposure durations were approximately 4·6 months for the two GLP-1/GIP AOMs, far short of the 72-week duration typically required for peak therapeutic benefit in RCTs. All AOMs showed substantial inter-individual variability in responses, regardless of exposure length. Substantial differences were found between RCT and real-world performance. For example, while Tirzepatide led both cohorts, nearly 50% and 25% of individuals didn't achieve the 10% and 5% weight loss target respectively, after a minimum 72 weeks exposure, highlighting a notable effectiveness gap. Critically, we identified that Metformin co-therapy acted as a modifier of the 'rebound effect,' significantly attenuating (median 1·9 - 2·6%, p < 0.0001) weight regain compared to semaglutide or tirzepatide monotherapy.Conclusion

Our findings confirm real-world AOM effectiveness and reveal challenges of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach of current pharmacotherapy. The marked inter-individual variability suggests that stratified, personalized pharmacotherapy is essential to transform transient weight loss into sustainable metabolic health.Clinical trial

Not applicable.

Related

  1. Broader factors associated with current adolescent overweight/obesity status in YRBSS 2023: Survey-aware analysis and calibrated AI-assisted classification
    Thu Hoang Thanh, Nhan Nguyen Thi, Toan Nguyen Khac
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPhysiologyPLOS
  2. Current Status and Barriers to Heart Failure Care in Japanese Geriatric Health Services Facilities ― A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey ―
    Yoshiharu Kinugasa, Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Akiko Okada +9
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Current status and capabilities of cancer prevention and treatment in county-level hospitals in Fujian Province: a baseline survey under the hierarchical medical system
    Chen Guo, Qingmei Feng, Zuotian Yu +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Current status of medical students’ use of large language models for graduation thesis writing: a comparative cross-sectional survey
    Xuexiu Liu, Junyang Luo, Yanhan Chen +3
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  5. Anti-Obesity Medications Versus Metabolic Bariatric Surgery as Pathways to Heart Transplant Eligibility in LVAD-Supported Patients: A Narrative Review
    Noah Sicouri, Vanesa Brecher, Vasiliki Androutsopoulou +4
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ruan2026current,
  title = {{Current status of anti-obesity medications and performance, an EHR based survey.}},
  author = {Xiaoyang Ruan and Rui Li and Liwei Wang and Shuyu Lu and Andrew Wen and Murali Sameer and Hongfang Liu},
  journal = {BMC endocrine disorders},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12902-026-02423-7},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897521},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Current status of anti-obesity medications and performance, an EHR based survey.
AU  - Xiaoyang Ruan
AU  - Rui Li
AU  - Liwei Wang
AU  - Shuyu Lu
AU  - Andrew Wen
AU  - Murali Sameer
AU  - Hongfang Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC endocrine disorders
DO  - 10.1186/s12902-026-02423-7
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897521
AB  - Background  While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) establish the efficacy of anti-obesity medications (AOMs), their real-world effectiveness, inter-individual variability, and weight regain post discontinuation remain poorly characterized across diverse, large scale populations.Methods  Electronic health records with pharmacy dispensation of obesity or overweight individuals were retrieved from local UT-Physician and nationwide EPIC COSMOS databases. AOMs were analyzed for short to long-term effectiveness on obesity relevant metrics.Results  From the two cohorts, 71,318 (11·7%) and 1 M (27·9%) individuals documented AOM exposures, respectively, with about 70% individuals experiencing more than one treatment session. Tirzepatide and Semaglutide outperformed other AOMs and were associated with up to 9·6[IQR:11]% and 6·2[IQR:11]% weight loss, respectively, and both improved blood pressure, HbA1c, and lipid profile. The median exposure durations were approximately 4·6 months for the two GLP-1/GIP AOMs, far short of the 72-week duration typically required for peak therapeutic benefit in RCTs. All AOMs showed substantial inter-individual variability in responses, regardless of exposure length. Substantial differences were found between RCT and real-world performance. For example, while Tirzepatide led both cohorts, nearly 50% and 25% of individuals didn't achieve the 10% and 5% weight loss target respectively, after a minimum 72 weeks exposure, highlighting a notable effectiveness gap. Critically, we identified that Metformin co-therapy acted as a modifier of the 'rebound effect,' significantly attenuating (median 1·9 - 2·6%, p < 0.0001) weight regain compared to semaglutide or tirzepatide monotherapy.Conclusion  Our findings confirm real-world AOM effectiveness and reveal challenges of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach of current pharmacotherapy. The marked inter-individual variability suggests that stratified, personalized pharmacotherapy is essential to transform transient weight loss into sustainable metabolic health.Clinical trial  Not applicable.
SN  - 1472-6823
ER  -