Evaluation of the comparative biofilm removal properties of four cleansing and debridement tools, in an ex vivo porcine wound model
Abstract
The effectiveness of four mechanical debridement devices for removing ex vivo porcine wound biofilms was assessed. Devices comprised a one-sided straight monofilament fibre pad, a one-sided looped monofilament fibre pad, a two-sided foam pad with distinct loosening and absorptive surfaces (TSFP), and traditional cotton gauze. Dual-species Staphylococcus aureus / Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were cultivated in an ex vivo porcine wound model. Debridement was standardised using a mechanical simulator and performed at a single time point (24 h, 72 h, or 7 d post-inoculation) to represent differing biofilm maturities, or repeatedly over seven days (once, twice, or three times) to simulate outpatient dressing-change schedules. Biofilm removal was quantified using colony counting and viability mapping. In the model-derived percentage-removal analysis following single debridements, OSLMP and TSFP demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze at 24 h. TSFP consistently achieved > 90% model-derived reduction in viable CFU/wound across all single-debridement time points and demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze at 24, 72 and 168 h. PrestoBlue staining revealed corresponding reductions in PrestoBlue-positive wound-surface coverage. Following repeated debridements, TSFP maintained > 90% model-derived reduction in viable CFU/wound and demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze following each debridement schedule. Hedges’ g effect sizes frequently exceeded 2.0 for TSFP relative to gauze and the single-sided devices, indicating pronounced effects under the predefined interpretation thresholds.
Related
- Cross-cultural adaptation and comparative psychometric evaluation of four patient-reported outcome measures for breast cancer-related lymphedema: measurement properties and clinical discrimination
- Comparative evaluation of crushing methods on the deagglomeration and enhanced properties of reclaimed asphalt pavement
- Comparative Efficacy of Bone Defect Filler Strategies Following Lesion Debridement for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis
- Comparative Assessment of Fungal Biofilm Development on PEEK and PDMS Biomaterials and the Antifungal Potential of TiO₂/ZrO₂-Coated PEEK.
- Impact of chlorhexidine gluconate on periurethral cleansing on catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a before-and-after quasi-experimental study at a tertiary care hospital.
BibTeX
@article{doherty2026evaluation,
title = {{Evaluation of the comparative biofilm removal properties of four cleansing and debridement tools, in an ex vivo porcine wound model}},
author = {Christopher Doherty and Sajwa Baqader and Steven Mercer and Andrew J. McBain},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-75044-8},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75044-8},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evaluation of the comparative biofilm removal properties of four cleansing and debridement tools, in an ex vivo porcine wound model
AU - Christopher Doherty
AU - Sajwa Baqader
AU - Steven Mercer
AU - Andrew J. McBain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-75044-8
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75044-8
AB - The effectiveness of four mechanical debridement devices for removing ex vivo porcine wound biofilms was assessed. Devices comprised a one-sided straight monofilament fibre pad, a one-sided looped monofilament fibre pad, a two-sided foam pad with distinct loosening and absorptive surfaces (TSFP), and traditional cotton gauze. Dual-species Staphylococcus aureus / Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were cultivated in an ex vivo porcine wound model. Debridement was standardised using a mechanical simulator and performed at a single time point (24 h, 72 h, or 7 d post-inoculation) to represent differing biofilm maturities, or repeatedly over seven days (once, twice, or three times) to simulate outpatient dressing-change schedules. Biofilm removal was quantified using colony counting and viability mapping. In the model-derived percentage-removal analysis following single debridements, OSLMP and TSFP demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze at 24 h. TSFP consistently achieved > 90% model-derived reduction in viable CFU/wound across all single-debridement time points and demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze at 24, 72 and 168 h. PrestoBlue staining revealed corresponding reductions in PrestoBlue-positive wound-surface coverage. Following repeated debridements, TSFP maintained > 90% model-derived reduction in viable CFU/wound and demonstrated significantly greater removal than gauze following each debridement schedule. Hedges’ g effect sizes frequently exceeded 2.0 for TSFP relative to gauze and the single-sided devices, indicating pronounced effects under the predefined interpretation thresholds.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -