Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)

Comparative Assessment of Fungal Biofilm Development on PEEK and PDMS Biomaterials and the Antifungal Potential of TiO₂/ZrO₂-Coated PEEK.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Zacatenco, Mexico City 07300, Mexico.
  2. 2Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Micología Médica, Unidad Profesional Lázaro Cárdenas, Casco de Sto. Tomás, Mexico City 011340, Mexico.
  3. 3Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Nanociencias y Micro y Nanotecnologías (CNMN), Laboratorio de Microscopía de Barrido de Ultra Alta Resolución, Av. Luis Enrique Erro S/N, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.
  4. 4Instituto Politécnico Nacional-ESIQIE, Laboratorio de Investigación en Nanomateriales y Energías Limpias, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.

Abstract

Polyether ether ketones (PEEK) and polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMS) are widely used biomaterials; however, their susceptibility to microbial colonization remains a limitation in clinical applications. This study comparatively evaluated biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Nakaseomyces glabratus on PEEK and PDMS and characterized the effect of TiO₂/ZrO₂-based coatings applied to PEEK. Biofilm development was analyzed during adhesion, maturation, and dispersion using biomass quantification, metabolic activity assays, and scanning electron microscopy. Surface modifications were also evaluated. Both species formed a biofilm on the biomaterials, with a significantly higher biomass on the control, followed by PEEK and PDMS. TiO₂/ZrO₂-based coating affected biofilm maturation, with coating B as the one producing the greatest reduction in biofilm development. These findings suggest that surface modifications, such as hydrophobicity, using TiO₂/ZrO₂ coatings may influence fungal biofilm reduction and improve the antimicrobial performance of biomedical materials.

Related

  1. Development of P^N-Pd(II) Type Complexes Derived from Aliphatic Amines as Potential Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents.
    Michelle Acosta-Encinas, Andrés Amaya-Flórez, Jordi R Galindo +8
    Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Dermatophytes in Argentina: species distribution, comparative identification accuracy of conventional and proteomic methods, introduction of a novel molecular identification approach, and antifungal susceptibility profiles
    Natalia Sasoni, María Sol Barbagelata, Ivana Maldonado +7
    Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Vaginal Lactobacillus paragasseri may attenuate fluconazole-resistant phenotypes in the subset of Candida albicans isolates and shows potential as a probiotic adjunct in antifungal therapy
    Qiuyue Wang, Hua Wang, Huirong Pan +5
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Development of a rapid LAMP assay toward point-of-care detection of dermatophyte infections and antifungal resistance
    Georgia Wunderlich, Shannen Butterly, Michael Johnson +2
    Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Model Interfaces in Third Molar Surgery Complication Scenarios: Response Quality, Clinical Content, Potential Clinical Risk, Readability, and Externally Observable Response Latency—A Cross-Sectional Comparative Benchmark Study
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{paz2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Assessment of Fungal Biofilm Development on PEEK and PDMS Biomaterials and the Antifungal Potential of TiO₂/ZrO₂-Coated PEEK.}},
  author = {Gabriela Angeles-de Paz and Luisa Ixchel Perez-Garcia and Fernando Torres-Ariza and Michelle Ramírez-Mireles and Hugo Martínez-Gutiérrez and Martín Daniel Trejo-Valdez and Aída Verónica Rodríguez-Tovar and Christopher René Torres-SanMiguel},
  journal = {Materials (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/ma19194161},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882660},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Assessment of Fungal Biofilm Development on PEEK and PDMS Biomaterials and the Antifungal Potential of TiO₂/ZrO₂-Coated PEEK.
AU  - Gabriela Angeles-de Paz
AU  - Luisa Ixchel Perez-Garcia
AU  - Fernando Torres-Ariza
AU  - Michelle Ramírez-Mireles
AU  - Hugo Martínez-Gutiérrez
AU  - Martín Daniel Trejo-Valdez
AU  - Aída Verónica Rodríguez-Tovar
AU  - Christopher René Torres-SanMiguel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/ma19194161
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882660
AB  - Polyether ether ketones (PEEK) and polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMS) are widely used biomaterials; however, their susceptibility to microbial colonization remains a limitation in clinical applications. This study comparatively evaluated biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Nakaseomyces glabratus on PEEK and PDMS and characterized the effect of TiO₂/ZrO₂-based coatings applied to PEEK. Biofilm development was analyzed during adhesion, maturation, and dispersion using biomass quantification, metabolic activity assays, and scanning electron microscopy. Surface modifications were also evaluated. Both species formed a biofilm on the biomaterials, with a significantly higher biomass on the control, followed by PEEK and PDMS. TiO₂/ZrO₂-based coating affected biofilm maturation, with coating B as the one producing the greatest reduction in biofilm development. These findings suggest that surface modifications, such as hydrophobicity, using TiO₂/ZrO₂ coatings may influence fungal biofilm reduction and improve the antimicrobial performance of biomedical materials.
SN  - 1996-1944
ER  -