Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Gastroenterology

Short-term clinical outcomes of 6-Fr versus 8-Fr catheters for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute calculous cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis

  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, 227-8501 Japan

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is a standard drainage option for patients with acute cholecystitis at high surgical risk. The association of between catheter diameter and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We compared short-term clinical outcomes between 6-Fr and 8-Fr catheters used for PTGBD.

Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study included patients who underwent PTGBD for acute calculous cholecystitis. Baseline characteristics between the 6-Fr and 8-Fr groups were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). Outcomes were assessed for adverse events (AEs), technical success, clinical success, and 30-day mortality.

Results: A total of 127 and 149 patients were included in the 6-Fr and 8-Fr groups, respectively. After PSM, 71 matched pairs were analyzed. After matching, the AE rate was significantly higher in the 6-Fr group than in the 8-Fr group (28.2% vs. 9.9%; risk difference [RD] 0.18; relative risk 2.85; p = 0.009). Clinical success was significantly higher in the 8-Fr group at days 5 and 7 (91.5% vs. 100%; RD = − 0.08; p = 0.041) but was similar between the groups by day 14 (98.6% vs. 100%; p > 0.999). No significant between-group differences were observed in technical success or 30-day mortality.

Conclusions: Compared with 6-Fr catheters, 8-Fr catheters were associated with fewer short-term AEs and may be associated with earlier clinical improvement. An 8-Fr catheter may be a reasonable option for short-term PTGBD management.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9.

Related

  1. Efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study
    Xiaofan Ma, Yingyu Liu, Yuqin Xia +2
    Langenbeck's Archives of SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  2. Coexistent IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholecystitis and Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis in the Gallbladder: A Case Report
    Takaki Okuyama, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Takayoshi Miyake +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Anomalous Gallbladder: Atypical Acute Cholecystitis in a Patient With Phocomelia.
    Arif Akkok, Joanna Kondroski, Asli Akkok +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Gallbladder Volvulus Mimicking Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Acalculous Cholecystitis: A Case Report.
    Moussa Sylla, Samuel Bamogo, Eric Pappalardo
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting at fully covered self-expandable metal stent placement to prevent cholecystitis in malignant distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter prospective single-arm study protocol (PROTECT study)
    Takayuki Oda, Yusuke Kurita, Masato Suzuki +9
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{azami2026shortterm,
  title = {{Short-term clinical outcomes of 6-Fr versus 8-Fr catheters for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute calculous cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis}},
  author = {Tetsushi Azami and Yuichi Takano and Naoki Tamai and Jun Noda and Fumitaka Niiya and Masatsugu Nagahama},
  journal = {BMC Gastroenterology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Short-term clinical outcomes of 6-Fr versus 8-Fr catheters for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute calculous cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis
AU  - Tetsushi Azami
AU  - Yuichi Takano
AU  - Naoki Tamai
AU  - Jun Noda
AU  - Fumitaka Niiya
AU  - Masatsugu Nagahama
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/06
JO  - BMC Gastroenterology
DO  - 10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9
AB  - Background: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is a standard drainage option for patients with acute cholecystitis at high surgical risk. The association of between catheter diameter and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We compared short-term clinical outcomes between 6-Fr and 8-Fr catheters used for PTGBD.  Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study included patients who underwent PTGBD for acute calculous cholecystitis. Baseline characteristics between the 6-Fr and 8-Fr groups were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). Outcomes were assessed for adverse events (AEs), technical success, clinical success, and 30-day mortality.  Results: A total of 127 and 149 patients were included in the 6-Fr and 8-Fr groups, respectively. After PSM, 71 matched pairs were analyzed. After matching, the AE rate was significantly higher in the 6-Fr group than in the 8-Fr group (28.2% vs. 9.9%; risk difference [RD] 0.18; relative risk 2.85; p = 0.009). Clinical success was significantly higher in the 8-Fr group at days 5 and 7 (91.5% vs. 100%; RD = − 0.08; p = 0.041) but was similar between the groups by day 14 (98.6% vs. 100%; p > 0.999). No significant between-group differences were observed in technical success or 30-day mortality.  Conclusions: Compared with 6-Fr catheters, 8-Fr catheters were associated with fewer short-term AEs and may be associated with earlier clinical improvement. An 8-Fr catheter may be a reasonable option for short-term PTGBD management.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05210-9.
SN  - 1471-230X
ER  -