Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,795 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cureus

Beyond Confidence: A Narrative Review Assessing Educational Outcomes in Simulation-Based Obstetric Training for Medical Students

  1. 1Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU
  2. 2Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CF2 Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, ROU

Abstract

Simulation-based education has become an increasingly important component of undergraduate medical training, particularly in obstetrics, where exposure to rare but high-risk emergencies may be limited during clinical rotations. Simulation provides a safe environment in which students can acquire procedural skills, improve decision-making, and develop confidence before encountering critical clinical situations. However, educational effectiveness is assessed differently across simulation-based obstetric training studies.

This narrative review examines the educational outcomes and assessment approaches used in simulation-based obstetric training among medical students. Particular attention is given to knowledge acquisition, technical and procedural performance, non-technical skills, self-confidence and self-efficacy, learner satisfaction, retention of acquired competencies, and transfer to clinical practice. The review also explores the assessment tools used to measure these outcomes, including structured checklists, global rating scales, objective structured clinical examination-based approaches, and investigator-developed instruments.

Current evidence suggests that simulation frequently improves learners' knowledge, perceived preparedness, and confidence. Nevertheless, subjective outcomes are often reported alongside, or sometimes in place of, objective measures of clinical competence. Furthermore, heterogeneity in assessment instruments and limited evaluation of long-term retention and clinical transfer make cross-study comparisons difficult.

By critically examining how educational outcomes are defined and measured, this review seeks to identify current limitations in simulation assessment and highlight priorities for future research, including greater use of validated objective measures, standardized outcome frameworks, delayed assessment, and evaluation of transfer from simulated to clinical environments.

Related

  1. Perceived Simulation Design Quality, Educational Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in a Resource-Conscious Burn Care Simulation: A Multicentre Observational Study.
    William Meschial, Muriel Fernanda de Lima, Luciene Andrade +6
    European burn journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  2. Association Between Structured Obstetric Simulation and OSCE Performance in Undergraduate Medical Students
    Rosa Patricia Cruz-Nieves, Angela Leticia Zambrano-Gutiérrez, Paulina Guadalupe Briseño-Sahagun +3
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPhysiologyPMC
  3. Environmental and systems-based safety in the obstetric operating room: A narrative review.
    Zoya Amer, Sanjana Kantipudi, Lauren Hennis +1
    Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Developing and assessing a pharmacy technician educational training program to improve access to over-the-counter hearing aids in rural communities
    Marcia J. Hay-McCutcheon, Elaine Mormer, Peter J. Hughes +4
    Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  5. Assessing an educational strategy to improve community health provider-led provision of cervical cancer screening services in western Kenya: A secondary analysis of the Elimisha-HPV cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Purity Chepkoech, Stephanie B. Jordan, Breandan Makhulo +5
    Global Health & MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{visan2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Confidence: A Narrative Review Assessing Educational Outcomes in Simulation-Based Obstetric Training for Medical Students}},
  author = {Ioana G Visan and Aida Petca},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117592},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.117592},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beyond Confidence: A Narrative Review Assessing Educational Outcomes in Simulation-Based Obstetric Training for Medical Students
AU  - Ioana G Visan
AU  - Aida Petca
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117592
UR  - https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.117592
AB  - Simulation-based education has become an increasingly important component of undergraduate medical training, particularly in obstetrics, where exposure to rare but high-risk emergencies may be limited during clinical rotations. Simulation provides a safe environment in which students can acquire procedural skills, improve decision-making, and develop confidence before encountering critical clinical situations. However, educational effectiveness is assessed differently across simulation-based obstetric training studies.  This narrative review examines the educational outcomes and assessment approaches used in simulation-based obstetric training among medical students. Particular attention is given to knowledge acquisition, technical and procedural performance, non-technical skills, self-confidence and self-efficacy, learner satisfaction, retention of acquired competencies, and transfer to clinical practice. The review also explores the assessment tools used to measure these outcomes, including structured checklists, global rating scales, objective structured clinical examination-based approaches, and investigator-developed instruments.  Current evidence suggests that simulation frequently improves learners' knowledge, perceived preparedness, and confidence. Nevertheless, subjective outcomes are often reported alongside, or sometimes in place of, objective measures of clinical competence. Furthermore, heterogeneity in assessment instruments and limited evaluation of long-term retention and clinical transfer make cross-study comparisons difficult.  By critically examining how educational outcomes are defined and measured, this review seeks to identify current limitations in simulation assessment and highlight priorities for future research, including greater use of validated objective measures, standardized outcome frameworks, delayed assessment, and evaluation of transfer from simulated to clinical environments.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -