Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Accelerator-based BNCT as a drug–device regimen: system engineering, clinical evidence, and regulatory considerations

  1. 1Center for Medical Device Evaluation of NMPA

Abstract

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a binary, tumor-selective radiotherapy modality that combines preferential delivery of boron-10 to tumor tissue with neutron irradiation to generate high-linear energy transfer particles in situ . The field has undergone a defining transition from reactor-based neutron sources to accelerator-based BNCT (AB-BNCT), enabling hospital-based deployment, broader clinical translation, and renewed global interest in indications with substantial unmet needs, particularly recurrent head and neck cancers and gliomas. However, AB-BNCT is intrinsically a drug–device regimen, requiring coordinated evaluation of the boron agent, neutron irradiation system, and dedicated treatment planning software, supported by end-to-end quality management, commissioning and routine quality assurance, and postmarket surveillance. This review summarizes the system-engineering foundations and current global landscape of AB-BNCT. We outline the therapeutic principle and key subsystems, including accelerator neutron sources, beam shaping assembly, patient positioning and setup, beam/dose monitoring, treatment control, and Monte Carlo–based BNCT treatment planning. We synthesize clinical evidence from reactor-era feasibility studies, accelerator-era registration programs, and emerging real-world evidence, including the Japanese Phase II registration study reporting an objective response rate of 71.4% in patients with unresectable recurrent or locally advanced head and neck cancer and subsequent nationwide postmarketing evidence. We also compare regulatory classification and approval pathways across the European Union, United States, Japan, and China. Finally, we discuss regulatory considerations relevant to the evaluation of BNCT devices in China. Continued advances in boron agents, accelerator engineering, and standardization, together with accumulated regulatory experience, may support broader clinical implementation of AB-BNCT. Further accumulation of evidence integrating beam physics, dosimetry, and clinical outcomes may facilitate cross-jurisdictional understanding and the continued clinical development of AB-BNCT.

Related

  1. Immunomodulatory strategies for ex vivo immune cell expansion in adoptive cell therapy: translational and regulatory considerations for clinical manufacturing
    Weng Wan Chan, Estella Zhi Yu Lim, Deepak Choudhury
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Toward Long-Acting Injectable Antidepressants: Drug-Delivery Strategies, Clinical Considerations, and Regulatory Barriers.
    Haripriya Koppisetti, Weranga Rajapaksha, Harsh P Nijhawan +3
    PharmaceuticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  3. Treatment of growth hormone deficiency with long-acting growth hormones in children, adolescents and adults: Clinical evidence and practical considerations
    Agnès Linglart, Régis Coutant, Véronique Kerlan +5
    Annales d'Endocrinologie = Annals of EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyEndocrinology & metabolismHAL
  4. Rhythmic dance interventions and dance/movement therapy for depression and anxiety: a structured narrative review of clinical evidence, candidate mechanisms, and implementation considerations
    Xiaopeng Chen, Ting Wang, Jun Wang +1
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. Biological and Clinical Applications of Dimethyl Sulfoxide: Evidence and Safety Considerations
    Zihan Huang, Jia Wang
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wang2026acceleratorbased,
  title = {{Accelerator-based BNCT as a drug–device regimen: system engineering, clinical evidence, and regulatory considerations}},
  author = {Zehua Wang and Yue Wang and Yan Jiang and Qing Zhang and Xiaofang Gu and Lu Liu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1972504},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1972504/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Accelerator-based BNCT as a drug–device regimen: system engineering, clinical evidence, and regulatory considerations
AU  - Zehua Wang
AU  - Yue Wang
AU  - Yan Jiang
AU  - Qing Zhang
AU  - Xiaofang Gu
AU  - Lu Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1972504
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1972504/full
AB  - Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a binary, tumor-selective radiotherapy modality that combines preferential delivery of boron-10 to tumor tissue with neutron irradiation to generate high-linear energy transfer particles in situ . The field has undergone a defining transition from reactor-based neutron sources to accelerator-based BNCT (AB-BNCT), enabling hospital-based deployment, broader clinical translation, and renewed global interest in indications with substantial unmet needs, particularly recurrent head and neck cancers and gliomas. However, AB-BNCT is intrinsically a drug–device regimen, requiring coordinated evaluation of the boron agent, neutron irradiation system, and dedicated treatment planning software, supported by end-to-end quality management, commissioning and routine quality assurance, and postmarket surveillance. This review summarizes the system-engineering foundations and current global landscape of AB-BNCT. We outline the therapeutic principle and key subsystems, including accelerator neutron sources, beam shaping assembly, patient positioning and setup, beam/dose monitoring, treatment control, and Monte Carlo–based BNCT treatment planning. We synthesize clinical evidence from reactor-era feasibility studies, accelerator-era registration programs, and emerging real-world evidence, including the Japanese Phase II registration study reporting an objective response rate of 71.4% in patients with unresectable recurrent or locally advanced head and neck cancer and subsequent nationwide postmarketing evidence. We also compare regulatory classification and approval pathways across the European Union, United States, Japan, and China. Finally, we discuss regulatory considerations relevant to the evaluation of BNCT devices in China. Continued advances in boron agents, accelerator engineering, and standardization, together with accumulated regulatory experience, may support broader clinical implementation of AB-BNCT. Further accumulation of evidence integrating beam physics, dosimetry, and clinical outcomes may facilitate cross-jurisdictional understanding and the continued clinical development of AB-BNCT.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -