Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology

Prognostic value of chronic total occlusion complexity scoring systems beyond procedural planning: a comparative analysis of five contemporary scores in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) complexity scores were developed to predict procedural difficulty during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI). Their value for predicting long-term clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

Aim: We investigated the association between commonly used CTO complexity scores and adverse outcomes after CTO-PCI and compared their prognostic performance.

Material and methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 149 consecutive patients undergoing CTO-PCI. Five CTO complexity scores (J-CTO, RECHARGE, PROGRESS-CTO, CL, and CASTLE) were calculated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or urgent coronary revascularization. Multivariable Cox regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 17.1 ±10.6 months, the composite endpoint occurred in 30 (20.1%) patients. After adjustment for age, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine, and albumin, all five CTO scores remained independently associated with the composite outcome. The J-CTO score showed the strongest association (adjusted HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.38–3.45; p = 0.001). The CASTLE score had the highest observed ROC-AUC (0.726, p < 0.001), although its discriminatory performance did not differ significantly from that of the J-CTO score. Harrell’s C-index also demonstrated comparable discrimination between the CASTLE and J-CTO scores (both C-index 0.697), indicating modest-to-moderate discriminatory ability. Patients with J-CTO ≥ 2 or CASTLE ≥ 2 had significantly worse event-free survival (log-rank p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusions: CTO complexity scores were independently associated with long-term adverse outcomes after CTO-PCI and may have prognostic relevance in addition to their established role in procedural planning. These findings should be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

Related

  1. Prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Rui Zhang, Jingjing Xu, Changdong Guan +16
    EuroInterventionPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  2. Clinical Performance and Safety of the Optima Non-compliant Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Balloon in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Multicenter Real-World Study.
    Sujeet Narain, Chirag Jagdish Parikh, Anup Ashok Pusate +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Prognostic Impact of Achilles Tendon Thickening After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared Between Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes
    Kaori Abe, Hideki Kitahara, Kazuya Tateishi +3
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
  4. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Admire Hlupeni, Mehran Jalilzadehbinazar, Rayvlin J. Liceralde +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedStatisticsCardiovascular medicinePLOS
  5. Prognostic Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ― Insights From the J-PCI Nationwide Registry ―
    Yoshihisa Kanaji, Kyohei Yamaji, Ayako Kunimura +15
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text2 citedInfectious diseaseJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{teber2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic value of chronic total occlusion complexity scoring systems beyond procedural planning: a comparative analysis of five contemporary scores in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention}},
  author = {Mehmet K. Teber and Mehmet Z. Aydın},
  journal = {Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.5114/aic.2026.164557},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13721082},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic value of chronic total occlusion complexity scoring systems beyond procedural planning: a comparative analysis of five contemporary scores in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention
AU  - Mehmet K. Teber
AU  - Mehmet Z. Aydın
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology
DO  - 10.5114/aic.2026.164557
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13721082
AB  - Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) complexity scores were developed to predict procedural difficulty during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI). Their value for predicting long-term clinical outcomes remains uncertain.  Aim: We investigated the association between commonly used CTO complexity scores and adverse outcomes after CTO-PCI and compared their prognostic performance.  Material and methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 149 consecutive patients undergoing CTO-PCI. Five CTO complexity scores (J-CTO, RECHARGE, PROGRESS-CTO, CL, and CASTLE) were calculated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or urgent coronary revascularization. Multivariable Cox regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.  Results: During a mean follow-up of 17.1 ±10.6 months, the composite endpoint occurred in 30 (20.1%) patients. After adjustment for age, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine, and albumin, all five CTO scores remained independently associated with the composite outcome. The J-CTO score showed the strongest association (adjusted HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.38–3.45; p = 0.001). The CASTLE score had the highest observed ROC-AUC (0.726, p < 0.001), although its discriminatory performance did not differ significantly from that of the J-CTO score. Harrell’s C-index also demonstrated comparable discrimination between the CASTLE and J-CTO scores (both C-index 0.697), indicating modest-to-moderate discriminatory ability. Patients with J-CTO ≥ 2 or CASTLE ≥ 2 had significantly worse event-free survival (log-rank p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively).  Conclusions: CTO complexity scores were independently associated with long-term adverse outcomes after CTO-PCI and may have prognostic relevance in addition to their established role in procedural planning. These findings should be confirmed in larger prospective studies.
SN  - 1734-9338
SN  - 1897-4295
ER  -